Dutch court scraps cap on number of flights at Amsterdam airport
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on March 11, 2026
2 min readLast updated: March 11, 2026
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on March 11, 2026
2 min readLast updated: March 11, 2026
The Dutch Supreme Court annulled the government’s 2024 decision to cap Schiphol Airport flight movements at 478,000 per year, ruling it lacked proper justification, ignored aircraft noise differences, and uncertainly addressed noise reduction; the night-flight reduction remains intact.
AMSTERDAM, March 11 (Reuters) - The Dutch Supreme Court on Wednesday scrapped a government decision to limit the number of flights at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, one of Europe's busiest hubs.
The court said the 2024 decision to limit the number of flights to 478,000 per year, made in an effort to cut noise pollution, had not been properly motivated.
The government said the judgment underscored the need for new regulations it is developing to strengthen the legal basis of its air-traffic policies.
Airlines had appealed the government's decision as they said it went too far, while climate activists and people living near the airport had appealed for more restrictive action.
The court said the government decision had failed to take into account that different airplanes produce different levels of noise, thereby setting an inappropriate general cap on the number of flights.
It said it was also unclear that the installed cap would in fact lead to the intended reduction in noise pollution.
The court did allow a reduction of nighttime flights, as none of the parties had appealed that part of the government's decision.
(Reporting by Bart Meijer. Editing by Mark Potter and Louise Heavens)
The court ruled the government failed to properly justify the cap and did not account for different noise levels produced by various aircraft.
The Dutch government set a cap of 478,000 flights per year in 2024 to reduce noise pollution.
Yes, the reduction of nighttime flights remains, as no parties appealed that aspect of the government’s decision.
Airlines appealed, arguing the cap was too strict, while climate activists and nearby residents sought even more restrictive measures.
The court stated it was unclear if the cap would actually result in the intended reduction in noise pollution.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
