Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >DMI SURVEY REVEALS UK RETAILERS LAGGING BEHIND EUROPE AND USA IN MOBILE EXPERIENCE
    Business

    Dmi Survey Reveals UK Retailers Lagging Behind Europe and USA in Mobile Experience

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on April 10, 2017

    6 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    This image depicts a graph highlighting the rise of cybersecurity threats targeting the financial services industry, emphasizing the urgent need for modernization while ensuring security and compliance.
    Graph illustrating cybersecurity threats in financial services - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Secret Shoppers Outline Gap in Customer Expectation and Retail Reality 

    DMI, a global leader in end-to-end mobility solutions announced the European results of its annual in-store experience rankings report. The Mobile Maturity Model (M3) platform reveals the comparison between 160 global retailers following secret shopper trials of the experiences that retailers offer via mobile devices to customers in their brick-and-mortar stores.

     

     

    UK top ten retailers
    (average score 52/240)
    Continentual Europe top ten retailers

    (average score 66/240)

      Retailer Retailer
    1 Asda Massimo Dutti
    2 Harvey Nichols Leroy Merlin
    3 Debenhams ClasOhlson
    4 Argos IKEA
    5 Waitrose Migros
    6 Morrisons DIA
    7 Harrods H&M
    8 B&Q Elgiganten
    9 Boots Mango
    10 John Lewis Tous


    Key findings

    • Gap between UK, Continential Europe and USA widening: While someUK retailers maintain comparable scores in the global rankings there’s a large disparity between the regional average scores demonstrating the growing gap between customer expectation and mobile experience. The average score in the USA was 107/240 – more than double the UK score. US retailers have created a clear competitive advantage in meeting and exceeding customer needs. UK retailers are hampered by legacy IT: underinvestment has caused them to fall behind at the exact time that mobile adoption has sky rocketed.
    • Mobile Reliants’ needs not met: The Mobile Reliants audience (those who regularly use their mobile in store, have 3+ retails apps on their smart phone and make purchases via mobile) remains the primary target for in-store experiences, yet brands are underserving them today.
    • Laggards: There were some surprising names on the list of UK companies falling far behind in the mobile race. Well known brands from across the supermarket, department store, clothing and homewares sectors had scores several points below the country average, demonstrating a lack of awareness of customer’s mobile needs.
    • Store’s mobile capabilities directly effects sales: as part of a 2,400 person survey into shopper behaviour and requirements, DMI research found that 56% of respondents would be more likely to make a purchase when shopping in-store from retailers who offered mobile features shoppers’ most desired. The figure rose to 76% amongst the mobile reliants segment. In addition, 81% of mobile reliants said they would have a more positive view of a brand. 

    Magnus Jern, Chief Innovation Officer, said:

    “It’s fascinating to see the variety of retailers included in the top ten: from high end to budget outlets, from homewares to supermarkets and clothing. It demonstrates that good customer service isn’t dependent on price point, but rather a thorough understanding of customer’s needs. Outside of the top ten there is a significant gap in scores between the haves and have-nots. Those who provide a quality mobile experience will continue to achieve higher revenue, customer satisfaction and have better insights and data across channels.” 

    Methodology

    DMI conducted research of 2,400 European shoppers to find out they found most important in physical and online shopping. This research, conducted by Qualtrics for DMI, evaluated current behaviours on mobile as well as future desires. Following these findings, DMI secret shoppers visited 60 stores and explored using the mobile apps while in the store to compare experiences. Six categories were examined: pricing; inventory; product reviews & advice; personalization; store guidance; checkout & loyalty. The maximum total available was 240. Each category was compared against customer expectation and reality and found a strong disparity in several instances. The full European report can be found here.

    Secret Shoppers Outline Gap in Customer Expectation and Retail Reality 

    DMI, a global leader in end-to-end mobility solutions announced the European results of its annual in-store experience rankings report. The Mobile Maturity Model (M3) platform reveals the comparison between 160 global retailers following secret shopper trials of the experiences that retailers offer via mobile devices to customers in their brick-and-mortar stores.

     

     

    UK top ten retailers
    (average score 52/240)
    Continentual Europe top ten retailers

    (average score 66/240)

     Retailer Retailer
    1AsdaMassimo Dutti
    2Harvey NicholsLeroy Merlin
    3DebenhamsClasOhlson
    4ArgosIKEA
    5WaitroseMigros
    6MorrisonsDIA
    7HarrodsH&M
    8B&QElgiganten
    9BootsMango
    10John LewisTous


    Key findings

    • Gap between UK, Continential Europe and USA widening: While someUK retailers maintain comparable scores in the global rankings there’s a large disparity between the regional average scores demonstrating the growing gap between customer expectation and mobile experience. The average score in the USA was 107/240 – more than double the UK score. US retailers have created a clear competitive advantage in meeting and exceeding customer needs. UK retailers are hampered by legacy IT: underinvestment has caused them to fall behind at the exact time that mobile adoption has sky rocketed.
    • Mobile Reliants’ needs not met: The Mobile Reliants audience (those who regularly use their mobile in store, have 3+ retails apps on their smart phone and make purchases via mobile) remains the primary target for in-store experiences, yet brands are underserving them today.
    • Laggards: There were some surprising names on the list of UK companies falling far behind in the mobile race. Well known brands from across the supermarket, department store, clothing and homewares sectors had scores several points below the country average, demonstrating a lack of awareness of customer’s mobile needs.
    • Store’s mobile capabilities directly effects sales: as part of a 2,400 person survey into shopper behaviour and requirements, DMI research found that 56% of respondents would be more likely to make a purchase when shopping in-store from retailers who offered mobile features shoppers’ most desired. The figure rose to 76% amongst the mobile reliants segment. In addition, 81% of mobile reliants said they would have a more positive view of a brand. 

    Magnus Jern, Chief Innovation Officer, said:

    “It’s fascinating to see the variety of retailers included in the top ten: from high end to budget outlets, from homewares to supermarkets and clothing. It demonstrates that good customer service isn’t dependent on price point, but rather a thorough understanding of customer’s needs. Outside of the top ten there is a significant gap in scores between the haves and have-nots. Those who provide a quality mobile experience will continue to achieve higher revenue, customer satisfaction and have better insights and data across channels.” 

    Methodology

    DMI conducted research of 2,400 European shoppers to find out they found most important in physical and online shopping. This research, conducted by Qualtrics for DMI, evaluated current behaviours on mobile as well as future desires. Following these findings, DMI secret shoppers visited 60 stores and explored using the mobile apps while in the store to compare experiences. Six categories were examined: pricing; inventory; product reviews & advice; personalization; store guidance; checkout & loyalty. The maximum total available was 240. Each category was compared against customer expectation and reality and found a strong disparity in several instances. The full European report can be found here.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostUK Smes ‘not Worried About the Impact of Article 50’
    Next Business PostPoor Checkout Process and Lack of Payment Options Main Causes of Abandoned Online Baskets, According to Ovum and Klarna