Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >Chinese tech firms ‘self-correct’ to get ahead of potential regulatory fury
    Business

    Chinese Tech Firms ‘self-Correct’ to Get Ahead of Potential Regulatory Fury

    Published by maria gbaf

    Posted on August 11, 2021

    4 min read

    Last updated: February 17, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    This image depicts the evolving landscape of China's tech industry as firms proactively self-correct in response to regulatory pressures. The article discusses how companies like KE Holdings and Tencent are adjusting their business practices to align with government expectations, aiming to mitigate potential regulatory repercussions.
    Chinese tech firms adapting to regulatory changes in the finance sector - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:innovationcompliancefinancial sectortechnologyregulatory framework

    Chinese Tech Companies Adapt to Regulatory Pressures with Self-Corrections

    By Yingzhi Yang and Brenda Goh

    BEIJING (Reuters) – Fretting about unprecedented regulatory heat for China’s tech sector, some companies are no longer waiting for any official reprimands that may or may not be forthcoming.

    Instead, eager to pre-empt authorities, they’ve decided to ‘self-correct’, imposing restrictions on or even walking away from their own businesses.

    KE Holdings, China’s largest platform matching buyers and sellers of real estate, is one such example.

    This year it quietly shut down its VIP services that promised fast-turnarounds for property sellers in exchange for exclusive listings and which had featured prominently on its popular Lianjia and Beike apps, two people familiar with the matter said.

    The decision to pull the plug on the VIP services was not prompted by a regulatory request but KE, which is currently the subject of an antitrust probe https://www.reuters.com/world/china/exclusive-china-launches-antitrust-probe-into-tencent-backed-property-broker-ke-2021-05-25, had wanted to move “proactively” and “voluntarily”, said the people who declined to be identified as KE has not publicised its actions.

    “It wasn’t a big business but it had the potential to become one,” said one of the sources.

    KE said in a statement to Reuters that any business adjustments on its part “were in compliance with government regulations and aimed at providing better services.”

    So-called ‘self-correction’ is promising to become a major corporate trend as the government tears into regulatory norms to promote socialist values and rein in what critics have called reckless capitalist expansion. The term is increasingly used by state media and is similar in tone to ‘self-criticism’ – a practice encouraged by China’s Communist Party.

    THE NEW NORMAL

    One of the most high-profile examples has been Tencent Holdings Ltd’s decision this month to introduce new limits https://www.reuters.com/technology/tencent-falls-after-china-media-calls-online-gaming-spiritual-opium-2021-08-03 on kids’ time spent on “Honor of Kings”, its most popular video game. That came just hours after its shares were battered by a state media article which described online games as “spiritual opium”.

    “Everyone is trying to get a clear read on the new normal and is resetting as fast as possible,” said Jeffery Towson, host of the Asia Tech Strategy podcast and former professor of investment at Peking University.

    “Nobody is doing ‘move fast and break things’ anymore. Nobody is using their market power too aggressively. Everyone is aligning their strategies more closely with the government’s priorities,” he said.

    While Chinese regulators have clamped down on a range of sectors from property to cryptocurrencies to private tutoring, the tech sector has come in for some of the harshest measures to date.

    Ant Group’s mega listing was scuppered at the eleventh hour last year, while regulators in July ordered newly listed ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc to take down its app from app stores in China.

    A slew of antitrust probes have also been launched, fines imposed, including a record $2.75 billion antitrust penalty for Alibaba Group Holding, while new guidance and regulations have been introduced or are in the works.

    Other ‘self-correcting’ companies include NetEase Music which announced last month it would not enter into exclusive contracts, a move that came after Tencent was barred by China’s market regulator from entering into exclusive music copyright agreements.

    Twitter-like Weibo also pulled an online list that ranks celebrities by popularity after a state media report critical of celebrity culture.

    “The brutal growth, disorder and greed of Chinese tech companies have caused a series of problems,” said Xie Pu, founder of Chinese tech website Techie Crab.

    “This kind of ‘self-correction’ will bring a relatively healthy competitive environment.”

    (Reporting by Yingzhi Yang and Brenda Goh; Additional reporting by Julie Zhu in Hong Kong; Editing by Edwina Gibbs)

    Frequently Asked Questions about Chinese tech firms ‘self-correct’ to get ahead of potential regulatory fury

    1What is the trend of 'self-correction' among Chinese tech firms?

    Chinese tech firms are proactively imposing restrictions and making adjustments to their businesses to align with government regulations, a trend referred to as 'self-correction'.

    2
    What prompted KE Holdings to shut down its VIP services?

    KE Holdings decided to shut down its VIP services not due to a regulatory request, but as part of its own strategy amid an ongoing antitrust probe.

    3How has Tencent responded to regulatory pressures?

    Tencent Holdings Ltd has introduced new limits as part of its self-correction strategy, reflecting a broader shift in the tech sector towards compliance with government expectations.

    4What are some examples of companies practicing self-correction?

    Examples include KE Holdings shutting down VIP services, NetEase Music avoiding exclusive contracts, and Weibo removing a celebrity ranking list.

    5What impact has the regulatory environment had on the tech sector?

    The regulatory environment has led to a clampdown on various sectors, with the tech industry facing some of the harshest measures, including antitrust probes and fines.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostNortonLifeLock Agrees to Buy Avast for up to $8.6 Billion
    Next Business PostMeeting the High Bar of Schrems Ii Compliance