Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Headlines > US Supreme Court rejects bid by oil companies to toss Honolulu's climate suit
    Headlines

    US Supreme Court rejects bid by oil companies to toss Honolulu's climate suit

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on January 14, 2025

    3 min read

    Last updated: January 27, 2026

    The image depicts the US Supreme Court building, symbolizing the landmark decision to uphold Honolulu's climate lawsuit against major oil companies, reinforcing accountability for climate change impacts.
    US Supreme Court decision on Honolulu's climate lawsuit against oil companies - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:Climate Changesustainabilityfinancial communityinsuranceinvestment

    Quick Summary

    The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by oil companies, allowing Honolulu's climate lawsuit to proceed, alleging decades of public misinformation.

    Supreme Court Upholds Honolulu's Climate Lawsuit Against Oil Firms

    By John Kruzel

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid by Sunoco and other oil companies to scuttle a lawsuit by Honolulu accusing them of misleading the public for decades about the dangers of climate change induced by the burning of fossil fuels.

    The justices turned away an appeal by the oil companies of a decision by Hawaii's top court allowing the suit, which alleged violations of state law, to proceed. Other defendants in the lawsuit include Exxon Mobil, BP, Shell, ConocoPhillips, BHP Group, Marathon Petroleum and Chevron.

    The suit was filed in 2020 by the city and county of Honolulu and the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, a semi-autonomous city agency. The plaintiffs said misleading statements made by the companies about the impact of their fossil fuel products paved the way for property and infrastructure damage caused by human-induced climate change.

    The plaintiffs have sought unspecified monetary damages. Honolulu is located on Hawaii's Oahu island.

    The lawsuit said that heat waves linked to climate change have stressed the city's electrical grid, and that a wastewater treatment plant would need to be retrofitted against sea level rise at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars, among other harms.

    Ben Sullivan, an official at the City and County of Honolulu's Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency, hailed the Supreme Court's action.

    "This is a significant day for the people of Honolulu and the rule of law. This landmark decision upholds our right to enforce Hawaii laws in Hawaii courts, ensuring the protection of Hawaii taxpayers and communities from the immense costs and consequences of the climate crisis caused by the defendants' misconduct," Sullivan said.

    Honolulu is among various U.S. jurisdictions to have filed suits seeking monetary damages from companies that extract, produce, distribute or sell fossil fuels, arguing that their activities contribute to emissions of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases linked to climate change.

    "Defendants have known for more than 50 years that greenhouse gas pollution from their fossil fuel products would have a significant adverse impact on the Earth's climate and sea levels," the Honolulu lawsuit stated.

    Instead of warning the public about the known consequences of using their products or working to minimize associated damage, the companies "concealed the dangers, promoted false and misleading information, sought to undermine public support for greenhouse gas regulation, and engaged in massive campaigns to promote the ever-increasing use of their products at ever-greater volumes," the lawsuit added.

    Among other consequences of this conduct, the lawsuit said, the average sea level will rise substantially along the Honolulu Pacific coastline, causing flooding, erosion and beach loss, and extreme weather affecting the region will become more frequent. 

    The companies urged a trial judge to dismiss the suit, arguing that the claims made under state law were preempted, or blocked, by federal law because those Hawaii statutes sought to regulate interstate emissions or commerce, powers reserved for the federal government.

    Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey Crabtree denied that request. The Hawaii Supreme Court in October 2023 upheld the judge's ruling, prompting the oil companies to appeal to the justices.

    The defendants had tried to move the case to federal court but were rebuffed by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2023.

    (This story has been refiled to fix a typo in paragraph 1)

    (Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)

    Key Takeaways

    • •US Supreme Court declined to hear oil companies' appeal.
    • •Honolulu's lawsuit alleges misleading public on climate risks.
    • •Defendants include major oil companies like Exxon and BP.
    • •Hawaii's top court allowed the state law-based suit to continue.
    • •The case highlights ongoing climate change litigation efforts.

    Frequently Asked Questions about US Supreme Court rejects bid by oil companies to toss Honolulu's climate suit

    1What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Honolulu lawsuit?

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by oil companies, allowing the lawsuit filed by Honolulu to proceed.

    2What are the main allegations in Honolulu's lawsuit against the oil companies?

    The lawsuit alleges that the oil companies misled the public about the impacts of climate change and concealed the dangers of their fossil fuel products.

    3What damages is Honolulu seeking in the lawsuit?

    Honolulu is seeking unspecified monetary damages related to the costs of retrofitting infrastructure against climate change impacts.

    4Who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Honolulu?

    The lawsuit was filed by the city and county of Honolulu along with the Honolulu Board of Water Supply.

    5What impact does the lawsuit claim climate change has on Honolulu?

    The lawsuit claims that climate change has stressed the city's electrical grid and will lead to significant sea level rise, causing flooding and erosion.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for Pressure grows on British Prime Minister Starmer over Mandelson fallout
    Pressure grows on British Prime Minister Starmer over Mandelson fallout
    Image for Namibia's energy ministry blasts TotalEnergies, Petrobras for not following procedure
    Namibia's energy ministry blasts TotalEnergies, Petrobras for not following procedure
    Image for Ukraine urges acceleration of peace talks, says only Trump can broker deal
    Ukraine urges acceleration of peace talks, says only Trump can broker deal
    Image for Czech prime minister in favour of social media ban for under-15s
    Czech prime minister in favour of social media ban for under-15s
    Image for Olympics-Alpine skiing-Vonn crashes out of women's downhill
    Olympics-Alpine skiing-Vonn crashes out of women's downhill
    Image for Portugal votes in presidential runoff with Socialist poised for victory
    Portugal votes in presidential runoff with Socialist poised for victory
    Image for Distrust, desertions, and dwindling bonuses undermine Socialist Party’s grip on Venezuela
    Distrust, desertions, and dwindling bonuses undermine Socialist Party’s grip on Venezuela
    Image for Four Indian students injured in knife attack in Russia, embassy says
    Four Indian students injured in knife attack in Russia, embassy says
    Image for Iran insists on right to enrichment, ready for confidence-building
    Iran insists on right to enrichment, ready for confidence-building
    Image for Meloni condemns 'enemies of Italy' after clashes in Olympics host city Milan
    Meloni condemns 'enemies of Italy' after clashes in Olympics host city Milan
    Image for New Zealand to hear Christchurch mosque shooter's appeal against sentence
    New Zealand to hear Christchurch mosque shooter's appeal against sentence
    Image for Ukraine imposes sanctions on foreign suppliers of components for Russian missiles
    Ukraine imposes sanctions on foreign suppliers of components for Russian missiles
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostFactbox-Main points of the Gaza ceasefire proposal
    Next Headlines PostTen EU countries call for sanctions on Russian gas, LNG, document shows