Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Finance

    Concrete and cement additives price-fixing lawsuit dismissed by US judge

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on June 25, 2025

    Featured image for article about Finance

    By Jonathan Stempel

    NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge in Manhattan on Wednesday dismissed a nationwide antitrust lawsuit accusing six companies that sell the vast majority of concrete and cement additives in the United States and Europe of conspiring to drive up prices.

    U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman said the "extreme and persistent" price hikes alleged by purchasers were "episodic," and inconsistent with coordinated activity in the estimated $27 billion global market for additives and so-called admixtures.

    "Plaintiffs' allegations fall short of suggesting that the price increases were not the product of normal market forces or that the explanations given were pretextual so as to suggest an antitrust conspiracy," Liman wrote.

    The defendants include Germany's BASF, Britain's Cinven Group, Italy's Mapei, Ohio-based RPM, France's Saint-Gobain and Switzerland's Sika.

    According to court papers, they control an estimated 80% to 90% of the $3 billion U.S. market for the additives, which are chemicals added to concrete, cement and mortar to improve the finished products' strength and stability.

    In his 50-page decision, Liman also said "plus factors" such as mergers, memberships in trade associations, and scrutiny by U.S. and European competition regulators suggested at most that a price-fixing conspiracy was possible, not plausible.

    Lawyers for the purchasers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Liman said the purchasers can try to replead most claims. The alleged conspiracy began in 2017.

    Litigation began after the European Commission in October 2023 conducted surprise inspections, which the purchasers called "dawn raids," at several producers of construction chemicals, on suspicion of possible anticompetitive conduct.

    The commission said the inspections were a preliminary investigatory step and did not mean it found anticompetitive behavior.

    In May 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice confirmed a Pennsylvania grand jury had begun probing the concrete and cement additives industry.

    The case is In re Concrete and Cement Additives Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-md-03097.

    (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Aurora Ellis)

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe