Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Headlines

    Explainer-What happens to Apple and Meta after the EU fine?

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on April 23, 2025

    Featured image for article about Headlines

    By Supantha Mukherjee

    STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -European Union antitrust regulators on Wednesday fined Apple 500 million euros ($570 million) and Meta 200 million euros to make the companies comply with the Digital Markets Act, which seeks to allow smaller rivals into markets dominated by the biggest companies.

    The fines follow a year-long investigation by the European Commission.

    WHY WAS APPLE FINED?

    The DMA required Apple to allow developers to send customers outside apps to make purchases, and find other app distribution channels, free of charge in order to avoid the fees Apple typically charges apps developers on its platform.

    The Commission found that the restrictions imposed by Apple kept app developers away from the advantages of alternative distribution channels outside the App Store. 

    Similarly, consumers were largely kept in the dark about these alternative and cheaper offers as Apple prevents app developers from directly informing consumers of such offers.

    The Commission said Apple failed to demonstrate that the restrictions are objectively necessary and proportionate.

    Regulators criticised Apple's conditions, which included adding a new fee, saying these make it unattractive for developers to use alternative app distribution channels such as the one provided by Epic Games.

    Apple said it would challenge the EU fine.

    WHAT CHANGES COULD COME?    

    Now Apple would have to remove technical and commercial restrictions that prevent app developers from steering users to cheaper deals outside the App Store.

    Apple has 60 days to comply with the Commission's decisions or risk periodic penalty payments.

    That would likely lead to a cheaper price for apps that consumers can directly download from outside Apple's store. 

    App developers would also benefit as they would not have to pay Apple if they host their apps on outside stores. 

    "Today's decision benefits all developers - European developers and American developers alike," Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said. 

    WHY WAS META FINED?

    Meta introduced a "Consent or Pay" model in November 2023 which gives Facebook and Instagram users who consent to be tracked a free service that is funded by advertising revenue. 

    To avoid ads altogether, Meta charges 5.99 euros per month on the Web and 7.99 euros per month on its apps.

    The Commission said the model did not comply with DMA rules as users had fewer choices on how their data was used.

    The fine relates to the time period between March 2024, when the DMA obligations became legally binding, and November 2024, when Meta introduced a new ad model.

    "The Commission (is) forcing us to change our business model, effectively imposing a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service," Meta said in an emailed statement.

    WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

    After numerous exchanges with the Commission, Meta introduced another version of the free personalised ad model in November last year, offering a new option that uses less personal data to display advertisements. 

    The Commission is currently assessing this new option and continues its dialogue with Meta, requesting the company to provide evidence of the impact of this new "less ads" model in practice.

    The "less ads" option was supposed to make the system legal, but it has massive usability issues, said Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems, who has repeatedly sued Meta for alleged breaches of the EU's privacy law. 

    Users are forced into "ad breaks" that prevent them from scrolling through their feed until a timer runs out and Meta nudges users into choosing the fully personalised option, he said.

    (Reporting by Supantha Mukherjee in Stockholm; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe