Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Business > VW asks Supreme Court to reverse Ohio diesel emissions ruling
    Business

    VW asks Supreme Court to reverse Ohio diesel emissions ruling

    Published by maria gbaf

    Posted on September 1, 2021

    4 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Image related to Volkswagen AG's Supreme Court appeal against Ohio's diesel emissions ruling, highlighting the automaker's ongoing legal battles over emissions manipulation and accountability.
    Volkswagen's legal challenges regarding Ohio diesel emissions - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    By David Shepardson

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Volkswagen AG on Tuesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse an Ohio court ruling that cleared the way for the state to move forward with a lawsuit over its diesel emissions scandal and manipulation of emissions-control systems.

    The German automaker previously asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appeals court ruling that said two counties could seek diesel-related financial penalties that could total billions of dollars. That request is pending.

    In June, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that the federal Clean Air Act did not pre-empt state law-based claims that Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is pursuing, or prohibit state oversight after a vehicle or engine is sold, as VW contends.

    “This is a major decision that will ensure that Volkswagen can be held accountable,” Yost said in June.

    VW said in court papers Ohio’s claims “could total $350 million per day, or more than $127 billion per year, over a multi-year period.”

    Ohio said VW engaged in “deceptive recalls” after vehicles were sold.

    VW and supplier Robert Bosch LLC in January asked the U.S. high court to reverse a unanimous 9th Circuit Appeals Court ruling that said Utah’s Salt Lake County and Florida’s Hillsborough County could seek “staggering” damages over updates made to polluting diesel vehicles after they were sold.

    The U.S. Supreme Court in April invited the Justice Department to offer its views on the issue.

    VW admitted in 2015 to secretly using illegal software to evade emissions rules, and pleaded guilty in 2017 to conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

    Volkswagen settled actions prompted by the emissions scandal for more than $20 billion, but that did not shield it from local and state government liability, the appeals court found.

    U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who ruled in VW’s favor in 2018, noted the automaker’s “potential penalties could reach $30.6 million per day and $11.2 billion per year” in the case involving the two counties.

    (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)

    By David Shepardson

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Volkswagen AG on Tuesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse an Ohio court ruling that cleared the way for the state to move forward with a lawsuit over its diesel emissions scandal and manipulation of emissions-control systems.

    The German automaker previously asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appeals court ruling that said two counties could seek diesel-related financial penalties that could total billions of dollars. That request is pending.

    In June, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that the federal Clean Air Act did not pre-empt state law-based claims that Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is pursuing, or prohibit state oversight after a vehicle or engine is sold, as VW contends.

    “This is a major decision that will ensure that Volkswagen can be held accountable,” Yost said in June.

    VW said in court papers Ohio’s claims “could total $350 million per day, or more than $127 billion per year, over a multi-year period.”

    Ohio said VW engaged in “deceptive recalls” after vehicles were sold.

    VW and supplier Robert Bosch LLC in January asked the U.S. high court to reverse a unanimous 9th Circuit Appeals Court ruling that said Utah’s Salt Lake County and Florida’s Hillsborough County could seek “staggering” damages over updates made to polluting diesel vehicles after they were sold.

    The U.S. Supreme Court in April invited the Justice Department to offer its views on the issue.

    VW admitted in 2015 to secretly using illegal software to evade emissions rules, and pleaded guilty in 2017 to conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

    Volkswagen settled actions prompted by the emissions scandal for more than $20 billion, but that did not shield it from local and state government liability, the appeals court found.

    U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who ruled in VW’s favor in 2018, noted the automaker’s “potential penalties could reach $30.6 million per day and $11.2 billion per year” in the case involving the two counties.

    (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Empire Lending helps SMEs secure capital faster, without bank delays
    Empire Lending helps SMEs secure capital faster, without bank delays
    Image for Why Leen Kawas is Prioritizing Strategic Leadership at Propel Bio Partners
    Why Leen Kawas is Prioritizing Strategic Leadership at Propel Bio Partners
    Image for How Commercial Lending Software Platforms Are Structured and Utilized
    How Commercial Lending Software Platforms Are Structured and Utilized
    Image for Oil Traders vs. Tech Startups: Surprising Lessons from Two High-Stakes Worlds | Said Addi
    Oil Traders vs. Tech Startups: Surprising Lessons from Two High-Stakes Worlds | Said Addi
    Image for Why More Mortgage Brokers Are Choosing to Join a Network
    Why More Mortgage Brokers Are Choosing to Join a Network
    Image for From Recession Survivor to Industry Pioneer: Ed Lewis's Data Revolution
    From Recession Survivor to Industry Pioneer: Ed Lewis's Data Revolution
    Image for From Optometry to Soul Vision: The Doctor Helping Entrepreneurs Lead With Purpose
    From Optometry to Soul Vision: The Doctor Helping Entrepreneurs Lead With Purpose
    Image for Global Rankings Revealed: Top PMO Certifications Worldwide
    Global Rankings Revealed: Top PMO Certifications Worldwide
    Image for World Premiere of Midnight in the War Room to be Hosted at Black Hat Vegas
    World Premiere of Midnight in the War Room to be Hosted at Black Hat Vegas
    Image for Role of Personal Accident Cover in 2-Wheeler Insurance for Owners and Riders
    Role of Personal Accident Cover in 2-Wheeler Insurance for Owners and Riders
    Image for The Young Rich Lister Who Also Teaches: How Aaron Sansoni Built a Brand Around Execution
    The Young Rich Lister Who Also Teaches: How Aaron Sansoni Built a Brand Around Execution
    Image for Q3 2025 Priority Leadership: Tom Priore and Tim O'Leary Balance Near-Term Challenges with Long-Term Strategic Wins
    Q3 2025 Priority Leadership: Tom Priore and Tim O'Leary Balance Near-Term Challenges with Long-Term Strategic Wins
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostChina’s factory activity contracts for first time since April 2020
    Next Business PostBlackRock tests Chinese retail appetite with mutual fund launch