UK court orders Samsung to pay China's ZTE a $392 million lump sum after patent trial
Finance

UK court orders Samsung to pay China's ZTE a $392 million lump sum after patent trial

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on May 1, 2026

2 min read

· Last updated: May 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

UK Court Orders Samsung to Pay ZTE $392M Lump Sum in Patent Dispute

Details of the Patent Dispute and Court Ruling

Background of the Legal Dispute

LONDON, May 1 (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics must pay a $392 million lump sum for a licence to use ZTE's patents for mobile phones, London's High Court ruled on Friday in the English leg of the companies' global licensing dispute.

ZTE has brought parallel lawsuits against Samsung in China, Germany and Brazil as the two companies battle over the terms on which Samsung can use ZTE's patents, and most importantly the cost.

Importance of the Patents

The patents are needed to ensure smartphones can access networks.

Legal Proceedings in the UK

Samsung sued ZTE in London in December 2024 seeking a determination of the fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory - or FRAND - terms of a patent licence. Such licences have repeatedly been the subject of global legal battles in the telecom industry.

The Court's Decision

Judge Richard Meade ruled that Samsung pay a lump sum of $392 million after the two companies were unable to agree on the renewal of a previous 2021 deal.

Comparison of Demands

The lump sum is more than the maximum $200 million Samsung had argued for, but less than the $731 million ZTE had sought.

Reactions and Next Steps

Samsung and ZTE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. They both have the right to appeal.

Global Context of Patent Litigation

England is a popular jurisdiction for patent litigation as it can set global FRAND terms, following a landmark 2020 UK Supreme Court ruling. The same is true for courts in China, where ZTE is separately seeking a ruling on FRAND terms.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin; editing by Barbara Lewis)

Key Takeaways

  • England continues to serve as a key global forum for setting FRAND terms, following the UK Supreme Court’s 2020 landmark ruling that empowered English courts to impose global FRAND licenses (brickcourt.co.uk).
  • The £392 million award bridges a substantial gap between the parties’ positions—Samsung sought a maximum of US$200 million, while ZTE sought roughly US$731 million (brickcourt.co.uk).
  • With parallel FRAND litigation ongoing in China, Germany and Brazil, the London decision may influence outcomes elsewhere and shapes global telecom‑patent licensing dynamics (brickcourt.co.uk)

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the UK court order Samsung to pay ZTE $392 million?
The court determined the lump sum as a fair payment for Samsung's licence to use ZTE's mobile phone patents after the firms failed to agree on renewal terms.
What are FRAND terms in patent licensing?
FRAND stands for fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory. Courts use FRAND terms to set patent licence fees in disputes.
Can Samsung or ZTE appeal the court's decision?
Yes, both Samsung and ZTE have the right to appeal the UK High Court's ruling.
Why is England a popular jurisdiction for patent litigation?
England's courts can set global FRAND terms for patent licences, following a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2020.
What other countries are involved in the Samsung-ZTE patent dispute?
Parallel lawsuits have been filed in China, Germany, and Brazil as part of the global licensing dispute.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category