Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

Traders split on success of MiFID II

  • 70% of traders think MiFID II has made trading more transparent
  • But just one-in-four think dark liquidity will move to lit markets
  • 86% of traders see reporting as the biggest concern post MiFID II rollout

 Traders disagree over whether MiFID II has been successful, according to new research by SIX. A combined 70% of surveyed traders of the Swiss exchange believe that trading has become more transparent – a key goal of MiFID II.

Paradoxically, only 26% believe that dark liquidity will shift to lit markets, highlighting the failure of a key aspect of the regulation. Traders indicate that they are also divided as to where dark liquidity on capped stocks will shift instead of lit markets, with a relatively even spread between:

  • Block Trading / LIS dark pools: 31%
  • Systematic Internalisers: 23%
  • Periodic auctions: 20%

According to Tony Shaw, Director London Office, Securities & Exchanges, SIX, “This variance in responses highlights the reigning uncertainty among traders. Over time, market developments will provide more conclusive answers on the success of MiFID II.

Reporting preoccupies the vast majority of traders as 86% of the respondents cited transaction reporting (50%) and best execution reporting (36%) as causing the most concern under MiFID II.

Although MiFID II and regulation remain a concern,it is no longer the single biggest challenge facing traders, with the picture now far more mixed. Those citing regulation such as MiFID II as the biggest risk in 2018 fell to 46%, compared with 73% in 2017.

The research also revealed that an overwhelming 87% of traders believe that the increased levels of volatility we saw in Q1 2018 is a trend that will continue. Interestingly, three quarters of traders stated that ETFs have contributed to this rise in volatility.

Commenting on the findings of the survey, Shaw added: “Despite the optimism of some traders, there is no consensus on whether MiFID II can be deemed a success. Our research demonstrates a large difference of opinion among market participants.”

The survey also highlighted that traders are much more positive about growth prospects for their own industry, with nearly two-thirds (62%) expecting more growth within their companies in the future, compared to a mere 15% one year ago.

Methodology

SIX has conducted a trader survey between 12 and 30 April 2018, with 174 respondents from across Europe, of which 53% traded in shares, 19% in Fixed Income, 14% in Structured products and 13% in ETFs/ETPs or other products. Previous surveys conducted in 2017 have focused on block trading and passive investing.

SIX
SIX operates and develops infrastructure services in the areas of securities, payment transactions and financial information with the aim of raising efficiency, quality and innovative capacity across the entire value chain of the Swiss financial center. The company is owned by its users (127 banks). With a workforce of some 4,000 employees and a presence in 23 countries, it generated operating income in excess of CHF 1.9 billion and group net profit of CHF 207.2 million in 2017.
www.six-group.com

For further information or if you would like to speak to SIX please contact [email protected]