Connect with us






By Charles Duross and the MoFo FCPA and Global Anti-Corruption Team

In order to provide an overview for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, we summarize below some of the most important international anti-corruption developments in the past month with links to primary resources.  December has traditionally been a busy month for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as they attempt to wrap up Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) cases.  This year was no exception with multiple blockbuster corporate resolutions closing in on nearly $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement combined with a series of guilty pleas from former executives.  Not to be outdone, enforcement agencies around the world also announced major cases and developments.  Here is our December 2014 Top Ten list:

  1. Alstom SA Pleads Guilty and Agrees to a $772 Million Fine. In a press release on December 22, 2014, DOJ announced that Alstom pleaded guilty to a two-count criminal information, which charged the company with FCPA violations arising from the bribery of officials in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Bahamas.  The enforcement action involved a guilty plea by Alstom, which was a publicly traded company until 2004, to violating the accounting provisions of the FCPA and another guilty plea by Alstom’s Swiss subsidiary to violating FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions.  The enforcement action included two separate three-year Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) for two U.S. subsidiaries of Alstom.  In announcing the resolution, DOJ said Alstom paid more than $75 million in bribes from 2000 to 2011 to secure $4 billion in contracts, which resulted in profits of approximately $300 million.  As a result, Alstom will pay a criminal fine of $772 million to resolve the charges.  This penalty is the biggest criminal fine ever levied for FCPA offenses and the second biggest FCPA enforcement action overall, just behind the $800 million fine and disgorgement in the Siemens case almost exactly six years ago.  The addition of Paris-based Alstom means three of the top ten biggest FCPA cases now involve French companies.
  1. Other Significant Corporate FCPA Resolutions in December:
  • Avon Resolves FCPA Violations with DOJ and SEC for $135 Million.  On December 17, 2014, a Chinese subsidiary of Avon Products, Inc. pleaded guilty in federal court in Manhattan to one count of conspiring to violate the FCPA.  The Chinese subsidiary made $8 million worth of payments in cash, gifts, travel, and entertainment to various Chinese officials.  Avon’s Chinese subsidiary will pay a $67.7 million criminal fine, and Avon itself entered into a three-year DPA and must retain an independent compliance monitor.  Avon also settled with the SEC and agreed to pay an additional $67.4 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, bringing the total amount of U.S. criminal and regulatory penalties paid by Avon and its subsidiary to more than $135 million.  The Justice Department’s release did highlight Avon’s cooperation with DOJ, which included conducting an extensive internal investigation, voluntarily making U.S. and foreign employees available for interviews, and collecting, analyzing, translating, and organizing voluminous evidence.  Avon Products, Inc. issued this release in connection with the agreements.  One aspect of the Avon matter not mentioned in the resolution documents was the substantial cost of the internal investigation, which by last year was reported to have exceeded $300 million.
  • Dallas Airmotive Inc. Enters $14 Million DPA with DOJ for FCPA Violations in Latin America.  On December 10, 2014, DOJ announced that Dallas Airmotive agreed to pay a $14 million penalty related to FCPA violations.  Dallas Airmotive, a privately held company, provides aircraft engine maintenance, repair, and overhaul services.  The company, based in Grapevine, Texas, admitted to FCPA anti-bribery violations in connection with bribes paid to Latin American government officials in order to secure lucrative government contracts.  A criminal information was filed in federal court as part of a three-year DPA.  The charges allege that between 2008 and 2013 Dallas Airmotive bribed officials of the Brazilian Air Force, the Peruvian Air Force, the Office of the Governor of the Brazilian State of Roraima, and the Office of the Governor of the San Juan Province in Argentina.  DOJ alleged that Dallas Airmotive used a variety of methods to pay the bribes, which included entering into agreements with front companies tied to foreign officials, making payments to third parties, and directly providing gifts to officials.
  • Bruker Pays $2.4 Million to Settle SEC FCPA Charges.  On December 15, 2014, SEC charged Bruker Corporation with violating the FCPA’s accounting provisions by providing improper payments and non-business related travel to Chinese government officials responsible for buying the company’s products.  Bruker, a publicly traded Massachusetts-based scientific instruments company, self-reported the misconduct and provided cooperation during SEC’s investigation.  According to SEC, Bruker made about $1.7 million in profits from bribe-tainted contracts with state-owned enterprises.  Kara Brockmeyer, Chief of SEC’s FCPA Unit, stated in the release:  “Bruker’s lax internal controls allowed employees in its China offices to enter into sham ‘collaboration agreements’ to direct money to foreign officials and send officials on sightseeing trips around the world.  The company has since taken significant remedial steps to revise its compliance program and enhance internal controls over travel and contract approvals.”  Bruker paid $2.4 million to settle the charges, including disgorgement and prejudgment interest, as well as a $375,000 penalty.  When determining the settlement, the SEC “considered the remedial acts promptly undertaken by Bruker and the significant cooperation it afforded to the Commission staff.”  The full administrative order can be found here.  No DOJ action was announced.
  1. Three Defendants in FCPA-Related Cases Plead Guilty:
  • AsemElgawhary Pleads Guilty in Overseas Corruption Case.  On December 4, 2014, AsemElgawhary, the former Principal Vice President of Bechtel Corporation and General Manager of the Power Generation Engineering and Services Company, pleaded guilty to mail fraud, money laundering, and tax-related charges in connection with a $5.2 million kickback scheme intended to manipulate the bidding process for state-run power contracts in Egypt.  In his plea, Mr. Elgawhary admitted to accepting a total of $5.2 million from three power companies, including kickbacks from Alstom, which were separately referenced in the matter against Alstom.  The kickbacks were paid by the companies to secure inside information on the bidding process, and resulted in a competitive and unfair advantage.  The power companies and their consultants paid more than $5 million into various off-shore bank accounts under the control of Mr. Elgawhary, a portion of which he used to purchase a house for $1.6 million in cash.  He is scheduled to be sentenced in March 2015.
  • Two Former Broker-Dealer Executives Plead Guilty.  On December 17, 2014, the former chief executive officer and an ex-managing director of U.S. broker-dealer Direct Access Partners LLC pleaded guilty to bribing an official of a state-owned Venezuelan bank in exchange for bond trading business.  Benito Chinea and Joseph De Meneses admitted to bribing Maria De Los Angeles Gonzalez De Hernandez, a former senior official in Venezuela’s state economic development bank, BANDES.  After receiving at least $5 million in bribes from 2008-2010, Ms. Gonzalez directed work to Direct Access generating more than $60 million in commissions.  Messrs. Chinea and De Meneses entered their pleas before Judge Denise Cote in the Southern District of New York.  Each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and the Travel Act.  Messrs. Chinea and De Meneses have also agreed to pay $3.6 million and $2.7 million in forfeiture, respectively, which amounts represented their earnings from the bribery scheme.  Messrs. Chinea and De Meneses were the fifth and sixth defendants to plead guilty in the matter.  Sentencing is scheduled for March 27, 2015.
  1. Battles Continue in Pending FCPA Cases in Connecticut and New Jersey. While three FCPA-related defendants may have pleaded guilty in December, two defendants continue to contest their charges, and both cases should be followed closely.
  • District Court Denies Former Alstom Executive’s Motion to Dismiss.  On December 29, 2014,{1} in United States v. Hoskins, the Honorable Janet Bond Arterton denied the defendant’s Motion to dismiss, which contained the following arguments: (1) a statute of limitations and withdrawal defense; (2) an argument based on the statutory interpretation of the meaning of the term “agent” in the FCPA; (3) a claim that the FCPA was unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant; (4) the lack of extraterritoriality under the FCPA to non-U.S. citizens; and (5) an argument that there was no venue for the money laundering charges in Connecticut.  In rejecting the defendant’s motion to dismiss, however, the district court left open a number of the defendant’s challenges until the evidentiary record is developed at trial.  If the case proceeds to trial, which is scheduled for June 2, 2015, these issues will likely be re-raised at the close of the government’s case-in-chief.
  • Judge Rejects and Defers Arguments by Former PetroTiger Co-CEO.  On December 30, 2014, the Honorable Joseph E. Irenas heard arguments on five motions in United States v. Sigelman case:  the defendant’s motion to suppress (and accompanying motion to seal documents filed in support of the suppression motion), motion to dismiss FCPA charges, motion to dismiss the honest services charges, and motion to strike surplusage from the indictment.  The court denied four of the five motions and deferred its ruling on the motion to dismiss the honest services charges.{2}  Trial is currently set for April 20, 2015.
  1. Foreign Bribery Enforcement Abroad:
  • Brazil Charges Thirty-Six in Connection with Petrobras Corruption Scandal.  On December 11, 2014, Brazilian prosecutors filed criminal charges against 36 people for their alleged involvement in a kickback scheme at Brazil’s largest company, Petrobras, a majority state-owned oil company.  Twenty-three executives from Brazil’s biggest construction companies were among those charged.  The companies involved in the scandal include:  Camargo Corrêa SA, Engevix, GalvãoEngenharia, Mendes Júnior, OAS, and UTC Engenharia S.A.  According to reports, the scheme potentially involves millions in bribes and numerous politicians.  The main informant in the case has also alleged that President DilmaRousseff knew of the scheme and purportedly allowed her political party to benefit from it.  The charges filed against the individuals include corruption, money laundering, and organized crime.  This is definitely a case to watch and certainly highlights Brazil’s increasing anti-corruption efforts.
  • UK Printing Company and Two Employees Convicted After Trial in London.  On December 22, 2014, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that, following a trial at Southwark Crown Court, Smith &Ouzman and two of its employees, Christopher John Smith (chairman) and Nicholas Charles Smith (sales and marketing director), were convicted of making £395,074 in corrupt payments to officials in Kenya and Mauritania to win contracts.  Two other employees were acquitted.  Sentencing is set for February 12, 2015.  This marks the second conviction at trial for the SFO in 2014 following the convictions of two former Innospec executives in June.  These two trial victories are no doubt good news to Director David Green CB QC in the wake of the SFO’s case collapsing at trial against Victor Dahdaleh a year ago.
  • Rheinmetall AG Reaches $46 Million Settlement with German Prosecutors.  On December 10, 2014, Rheinmetall AG, a German-based auto parts maker and defense contractor released a statement that one of its subsidiaries, RheinmetallDefense Electronics (RDE), reached a $46 million settlement with German prosecutors to resolve allegations of bribery related to arms sales in Greece.  RDE was accused of failing to detect and prevent suspicious payments to sales partners due to inadequate internal controls.  Rheinmetall AG has approximately 21,000 employees and is headquartered in Düsseldorf.
  • Aberdeen-Based Company Pays £172,200 to Scotland’s Prosecution Service for Corrupt Conduct in Kazakhstan.  On December 17, 2014, Scotland’s Prosecution Service announced that its Civil Recovery Unit recovered £172,200 from International Tubular Services Limited (ITS), an Aberdeen-based oil and gas company.  ITS admitted that “it had benefited from corrupt payments made by a former Kazakhstan-based employee to secure additional contractual work from a customer in Kazakhstan.”  In announcing the matter, the Prosecution Service remarked that “{t}he bribery and corruption was discovered when the company was being sold,” highlighting once again the need for appropriate anti-corruption due diligence as part of M&A transactions.
  1. Transparency International Releases its Corruption Perceptions Index for 2014. On December 3, 2014, Transparency International launched its 20th Annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) for 2014.  The Index draws on 12 surveys covering expert assessments and views of business people, and ranks 175 countries/territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption from 0 (very corrupt) to 100 (very clean).  Highlights from the 2014 Index include the fact that China (with a score of 36), Turkey (45), and Angola (19) saw the biggest decline, with a drop of 4 or 5 points despite average economic growth of more than 4% over the last four years.  Also noteworthy was Denmark’s top performance in 2014 with a score of 92.  North Korea and Somalia shared last place, both scoring 8.
  1. OECD Releases Report on Foreign Bribery.  On December 2, 2014, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released its first-ever global analysis of crime and bribery of foreign officials and on December 10, 2014, the OECD, in conjunction with the World Bank and the International Bar Association, hosted a forum discussing it in depth.  The Report measures the crime of transnational corruption based on analysis of data emerging from foreign bribery enforcement actions concluded since the establishment of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention in 1999.  In total, 427 transnational bribery cases were reviewed.  A few of the key takeaways from the report include:
  • Intermediaries were involved in 3 out of 4 foreign bribery cases.
  • Almost two-thirds of cases occurred in four sectors:  mining (19%); construction (15%); transportation and storage (15%); and information and communications (10%).
  • In most cases (57%), bribes were paid to win public procurement contracts, followed by clearance of customs (6%) and attempts to gain preferential tax treatment (6%).
  • In 41% of cases, management-level employees paid or authorized the bribe, whereas chief executives were involved in 12% of cases.
  • Nearly 70% of the cases studied were settled, often involving a civil or criminal fine.
Charles Duross

Charles Duross

According to the Report, governments around the world should strengthen sanctions, make settlements public, and reinforce protection of whistleblowers as part of greater efforts to tackle bribery and corruption.  The overwhelming use of intermediaries also demonstrates the need for more effective due diligence and oversight of corporate compliance programs.  While the data has a number of limits and the observations will be critiqued in the months to come, the Report was an excellent first step in analyzing enforcement data across countries.

  1. Pemex Sues Hewlett-Packard and its Mexican Subsidiary. On December 2, 2014, PetróleosMexicanos (Pemex) filed a civil RICO lawsuit in the wake of HP’s $108 million FCPA resolution with DOJ and SEC earlier this year.  Pemex is Mexico’s state-owned oil and gas company, and the allegations from HP’s FCPA resolution earlier this year alleged improper conduct involving Pemex officials.  Pemex now seeks damages arising from the allegedly corrupt contracts.  Pemex’s lawyers allege that HP’s faulty internal controls enabled the bribes and corruption, which purportedly routed approximately $6 million in business to HP.  Pemex is seeking disgorgement or restitution and treble damages under the RICO statute, as well as injunctions to bar future FCPA violations by HP and force the company to investigate whether any other contracts were granted as a result of corruption.  This most recent case highlights the risks of civil actions following in the wake of FCPA resolutions with government enforcement agencies.
  1. The World Bank Hosted the Third Biennial Meeting of the International Corruption Hunters Alliance (ICHA). On December 8-10, 2014, the World Bank hosted the ICHA 2014 at its headquarters in Washington, D.C.  As part of his work as President of United for Wildlife, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, joined the World Bank Group President, Jim Yong Kim at the opening session.  Prince William addressed more than 300 corruption experts, heads, and senior members of anti-corruption and prosecuting agencies and representatives of international organizations from more than 120 countries.  At the meeting, he announced the founding of a new task force to shut down illegal wildlife trade routes, as he urged action on the illegal wildlife trade, what he called one of the most insidious forms of corruption.  President Kim remarked that corruption is not only a threat to sustainable development, but also to the goals of ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity.  He further added, “Corruption may very well be one of the most blatant expressions of inequality in our society.”
  1. The Potential Perils of FOIA Request after Producing Documents to the Government. On December 8, 2014, a three-judge D.C. Circuit panel heard arguments by Chiquita Brands International Inc. seeking to keep SEC from responding to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by producing 23 boxes of materials produced to SEC during the course of a foreign bribery investigation a decade earlier.  Chiquita, which is embroiled in a multi-district litigation in the Southern District of Florida brought by 6,000 Colombian citizens under the Alien Tort Act who want to hold the company liable for payments it made to Colombian paramilitary groups, called the payments “extortion” and said they were necessary to keep its workers safe.  Now, the D.C. Circuit must decide if SEC should—or should not—produce the records in response to FOIA requests, which Chiquita claims are exempt from production under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(B).  Chiquita resolved an FCPA matter in 2001 involving payments by its subsidiary, through a third-party customs broker, to Colombian customs officials, and later pleaded guilty in 2007 for making payments to the United Self Defense Forces of Colombia, or AUC, a designated terrorist organization.  The case serves as a reminder that, even when confidential treatment is sought, later FOIA requests could lead to disclosure and, therefore, whenever producing materials to government agencies, a company must be circumspect and thoughtful in its approach.

As 2014 comes to an end, and 2015 starts, one thing appears clear:  DOJ and SEC show no signs of slowing down.  A decade into their enhanced enforcement of the FCPA, and in spite of transitions at DOJ’s Criminal Division and SEC’s Division of Enforcement, the 2014 FCPA enforcement record reflects the continuing priority of FCPA enforcement, ever-increasing international cooperation, and sustained efforts to investigate and prosecute companies and businesspeople for FCPA (and related) violations.


Beyond Transactions: The Payment Revolution



Beyond Transactions: The Payment Revolution 2

By Marwan Forzley, CEO of Veem 

The uninterrupted disruption brought on by the pandemic accelerated the need for robust, digital-first tools created to support remote teams and accelerate online commerce.

As offices across the US moved to work from home for indefinite periods, specialized back office departments handling sensitive information have had to go a layer deeper to find tailored solutions that support the transition of their in-person workflow. For finance teams, payment approvals, issuance, and general management became a challenge overnight. Particularly for those who — even in 2020 — continued to send and receive paper checks through the mail.

For years and even to this day, millions of small business owners around the world have relied on slow and confusing bank processes to manage their business finances. Every day, they spend valuable time using old, complex and expensive platforms to transact with domestic and international vendors — never knowing where their payment is or even when it arrives at its destination.

With ongoing economic and logistical uncertainty looming as we move into 2021, this old norm should not be expected for much longer. This year has seen small business owners wear more hats than ever before, and has influenced a mass adoption of online financial applications that offer heightened security, save more time, and provide more value as budgets tightened.

A study conducted by Mastercard earlier this year saw online business-to-business payments skyrocket in popularity with more than half (57%) of small business owners across North America turning to digital services since the start of the pandemic to improve cash flow and modernize their payment processes.

If this study is of any indication, the days of making an appointment with a banker or sending a wire transfer through an outdated web portal have passed. And the time for the payment revolution is here.

Putting the user in the driver’s seat

Major world events have always acted as a catalyst for innovation and change. As of a result of the growing pains we experienced this year, in 2021 businesses can finally say goodbye to huge transaction fees and bank-imposed gatekeeping when it comes to managing their financial processes.

The financial technology firms, in partnership card and local bank networks and sometimes even each other, have been building and iterating on products over the past decade that were created to work flawlessly from a desktop or smartphone.

For the first time, small businesses have access to needed, user-friendly financial tools packaged to make their lives easier. No longer reserved for major enterprises, those previously underserved by traditional banks can sign up for applications that consolidate billing, payments, working capital and more to one central dashboard.

With the owner in the driver’s seat, they can better communicate with vendors and customers and reallocate their time previously spent manually sending, receiving and reconciling payments toward growing their business — without ever stepping foot out of their home.

Marwan Forzley

Marwan Forzley

Genuinely seamless and automatic integrations with complimentary functions aligned to core financial activities mark a fundamental change in how businesses will choose to operate moving forward. Not only should experiences be integrated, but the entire lifecycle of the transaction should be digital.

Consider a freelance contractor that uses a time tracking and invoicing software to invoice a client. Through an integration between the time tracking tool and Veem (a complete online business payment tool) the client receives and captures the invoice within their Veem payment dashboard. Because Veem and Quickbooks are integrated partners, as soon as the invoice is received, a bill is automatically created, marked as paid, and reconciled on the client’s accounting software as soon as the funds are issued.

In this flow, the contractor only needs to send an invoice, and the client only has to approve the payment for everything else to move. Thoughtful integrations like these empower businesses to log-in to one application, but benefit from several, ultimately eliminating inefficiencies.

Relentless transparency

Understanding that old habits die hard, it’s expected that businesses of any size have questions when it comes to moving payments from a bank to an online provider.

Answering these questions with unprecedented product value and relentless transparency is the best way forward to bring more businesses onboard in 2021.

This means providing up front pricing, tracking, choice and flexibility to users. Before, during and after the pandemic, cash flow management remains the most critical part of running a small business. Digital payment providers enable the entrepreneur to have unparalleled insight, visibility, and control over their cash flow.

Through non-bank payment options, businesses can secure their information over a secure data network, watch their money move from origin to destination, and choose the speed at which they would like funds to move. By these tools working in harmony, the user can remove friction and spend more time focused on their business.

Separating the signal from the noise

2020 is a year that changed everything for the global small business community. In a report by Veem issued at the start of the pandemic, an overwhelming 80% of businesses shared that they anticipated COVID-19 to impact their business over the next 12-16 months. Problems surfaced that many didn’t even realize they had. And in finding those problems, businesses turned to technology to support them.

As enabling technology, it’s our job to listen and bring clarity and solutions to those contributing to and growing our local and global economies despite the hurdles and challenges they’ve faced.

Right now, small businesses deserve more. More access, more choice and more credit. In the road ahead we expect online payments and bundled user friendly financial services to play a pivotal role in the recovery of small businesses. The payment revolution will see the continuation of important and meaningful products that value the users time and enable businesses to launch, grow, and scale regardless of what’s to come in 2021.

Continue Reading


The UK’s hidden payments crisis: why businesses should rethink their payments strategy



The UK’s hidden payments crisis: why businesses should rethink their payments strategy 3

By Edwin Abl, Chief Marketing Officer at Modulr.

As the economic conditions imposed by the Coronavirus endure, businesses are facing a dilemma about how to reduce operational costs while meeting customer needs in as economical a way as possible. And all without compromising on their quality of service.

A recent survey of 200 payments decision makers across the UK, revealed there are hidden costs of payment processing which will have an exponentially greater impact on wider businesses if left untreated. It found, UK businesses are spending an average of £1.5m a year in costs attached to payments – money they simply cannot afford to lose to inefficient processes in these uncertain times.

Businesses need to plug any holes in their boat to avoid sinking. And for many this includes the examination and recalibration of their payments strategy.

The research reveals that the payments process now represents a huge 12% of a business’s total operational expenditure. With two-thirds (64%) of all businesses expecting the cost of payment processing to increase over the next two years.

Two thirds (67%) of payments decision makers surveyed believe the way they process, and service payments has had a direct impact on their customer experience. In fact, 62% of respondents believe the hidden costs of poor payments outweigh the hard costs. This indicates that a poor payments strategy is no longer something business leaders can ignore, as it now has a far greater and unseen impact on wider business mechanics.

The top three hidden costs attached to inefficient payment processes were ‘impact on customer experience/satisfaction’ (38%), ‘influence on relationships with other teams and departments (35%) and ‘impact on competitor differentiation’ (31%).

These findings suggest there is widespread consensus that getting payment operations right, directly creates performance boosts elsewhere in the business. When asked to estimate, as a percentage, the business performance boost received if hidden payment inefficiencies were resolved, the average margin for improvement was +14%, with traditional banking the sector most likely (31%) to predict a performance gain greater than +15%.

The 5 key steps UK businesses can take to drive payment efficiencies

There are five key areas payments decision makers and tech leaders should be looking to change, so that they can drive end-to-end payment process efficiencies:

1 – Locate hidden payment process inefficiencies

Visibility is a key issue. Respondents across large (46%) and small businesses (47%) say they have very clear metrics directly related to payment process costs. Only 8% say that they don’t understand the costs involved. Yet, businesses know they could do better with improved visibility of costs. Both large and smaller companies cite ‘lack of visibility for operational costs’ as the top challenge when it comes to achieving strategic goals around payment process and money services provision.

Digital banking companies, including lenders and FinTechs, identified ‘lack of visibility for operational cost’ as a challenge when it comes to increasing payment services revenue (37%). This is in comparison with all respondents mentioning other issues such as lack of skills (25%) and constrained resources (25%) as secondary and tertiary challenges respectively.

For many businesses, developing a cost model for current and projected payment process costs, both hard and hidden, is a top priority.

2 – Make payments key to stakeholder experience management

Customer, departmental and even supply chain partner experiences are increasingly intertwined. There is no doubt that customer experience is a top priority for payment services strategy. But enhancing the broader stakeholder experience is a close second, and certainly complements the former.

Employee experience affects customer experience. So, payment services innovation must extend beyond customer touchpoints. Happy employees who feel they are working with effective and efficient payments systems will be best placed to enhance the customer experience. And, employees in commercial roles who have bought into the benefits of efficient payments will naturally want to extoll those benefits to customers.

Edwin Abl

Edwin Abl

Companies with a sophisticated and integrated supply chain are likely to be the frontrunners in implementing the integrated payment services that benefit all stakeholders, due to their historic experience. As customer experience management evolves into a broader discipline of stakeholder experience management, including employees and supply chain partners, it will become more crucial than ever to include payment services experience

3 – Integrate and automate to support payment innovation

Payment innovation is driving a culture change, connecting previously siloed functions such as IT and finance. There is increasing integration of systems from customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP), into accounts and payments. The research tells us that payment processes are impacting nearly every department, affecting areas including customer experience, brand, leadership, business agility and ultimately, revenue. Integration enables new business models for paying suppliers and customers.

Automation is key to driving efficiency, replacing manual error-prone and time-consuming processes with real-time and responsive, digital ones. This is particularly the case when it comes to operational and payment processes.

Indeed, 52% of large companies say that team hours spent on payment processes was their biggest hard cost attached to payments, compared with 26% of smaller companies who share that view. This suggests that automation could contribute more to cutting the cost of payment processes in large companies.

A host of payments-as-a-service providers (including Modulr) are supporting customers to do just this by enabling them to stream a whole unified product ecosystem of payments functionality directly into their own software.

4 – Bring business leaders together

Payments innovation is driving systems integration and creating a more collaborative stakeholder ecosystem. As all the C-level roles become increasingly focused on the customer experience, the finance remit now includes overall business operations and its associated risks and opportunities. The role is evolving beyond just accounting, tax liability and funding. Therefore, closer collaboration between senior leaders is key to driving efficiencies and enhancing customer experience.

5 – Innovate by adding finance and payments to vertical services

Companies with a vertical focus are well placed to innovate by offering new payment services. In many vertical sectors, especially employment services, software vendors are increasingly embedding financial services facilities, such as payments, into their technology platforms. Employment services SaaS providers, across payroll, accounting, bookkeeping and more are offering financial services to existing and new customers within their specific ecosystem.

This means they can develop hyper relevant, convenient and delightful financial products and services for their end users through highly flexible, ‘plumbed in’ payments. This creates an ecosystem of stickier products while boosting the lifetime value of each end user.

Moving forward – engaging technology to drive efficiencies

If the onset of the Coronavirus crisis has taught us anything, it is that there are many advantages to investing in technology and having a digital infrastructure as responsive as your customer-facing experience.

However, whilst digital technologies enable companies to provide customer service in new ways during lockdown. These same businesses are failing to transform their digital strategies, with the biggest priority still being cost reduction (41%).

By not shedding legacy technology and shoring up operational efficiency, UK businesses are following an increasingly risky strategy. And one which will have an exponentially greater impact on the wider business if left untreated. Particularly when this widespread failure to act concerns the customer experiences that sit at the very heart of a proposition – the payments.

To find out how you can drive payment efficiencies into 2021 and beyond, download the full report here for all the insight you need.

Continue Reading


Gain financial regulation qualification online



Gain financial regulation qualification online 4

Gain financial regulation qualification online  

Warwick Business School in partnership with the Bank of England are delighted to offer two online specialist Postgraduate Awards, which are perfect for anyone working in financial regulation to evidence their professional development.

  • Financial Conduct, Leadership & Ethics – Starting in February 2021
    You will debate and cover questions such as how do financiers judge ethical questions in financial markets? What are the implications for regulators and for clients?
  • Financial Regulation & Supervision – Starting in June 2021
    You will develop a comprehensive understanding around financial regulation by looking at topics such as its tools, benefit and practical application.

Studied online over a period seventeen weeks, you will gain a detailed knowledge of the subject, learn industry best practice and gain a qualification to evidence your understanding.

The wider Global Central Banking & Financial Regulation qualification offers three start dates and four qualification levels.

Gain financial regulation qualification online 5

Invest in your career

Find out more about these Awards and the qualification levels offered by Warwick Business School in partnership with the Bank of England, by downloading the brochure here.

This is a sponsored feature

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2020
2020 Global Banking & Finance Awards now open. Click Here

Latest Articles

Beyond Transactions: The Payment Revolution 6 Beyond Transactions: The Payment Revolution 7
Finance4 hours ago

Beyond Transactions: The Payment Revolution

By Marwan Forzley, CEO of Veem  The uninterrupted disruption brought on by the pandemic accelerated the need for robust, digital-first...

The UK’s hidden payments crisis: why businesses should rethink their payments strategy 8 The UK’s hidden payments crisis: why businesses should rethink their payments strategy 9
Finance4 hours ago

The UK’s hidden payments crisis: why businesses should rethink their payments strategy

By Edwin Abl, Chief Marketing Officer at Modulr. As the economic conditions imposed by the Coronavirus endure, businesses are facing a...

Investing into a more sustainable future: changing businesses from the inside out 10 Investing into a more sustainable future: changing businesses from the inside out 11
Top Stories4 hours ago

Investing into a more sustainable future: changing businesses from the inside out

By Shawn Welch, Vice President and General Manager of Hi-Cone Worldwide As industries across the world are facing unprecedented uncertainty...

Securing Information Throughout the Supply Chain – Preventing Supplier Vulnerabilities  12 Securing Information Throughout the Supply Chain – Preventing Supplier Vulnerabilities  13
Top Stories5 hours ago

Securing Information Throughout the Supply Chain – Preventing Supplier Vulnerabilities 

By Adam Strange, Data Classification Specialist, HelpSystems  The financial services sector is experiencing extreme disruption coupled with rapid innovation as...

RegTech 2020: The rise of Open Banking 14 RegTech 2020: The rise of Open Banking 15
Banking6 hours ago

RegTech 2020: The rise of Open Banking

This month on the RegTech 20:20 podcast, host Alex Ford is joined by industry experts Gavin Littlejohn, Chairman of The...

The case for AI technology adoption in financial back-office roles to improve efficiency 16 The case for AI technology adoption in financial back-office roles to improve efficiency 17
Technology8 hours ago

The case for AI technology adoption in financial back-office roles to improve efficiency

By Tomas Gogar, AI CEO, Rossum In this era, digital transformation isn’t anything new. Nonetheless, it can still cause a...

Gain financial regulation qualification online 18 Gain financial regulation qualification online 19
Finance8 hours ago

Gain financial regulation qualification online

Gain financial regulation qualification online   Warwick Business School in partnership with the Bank of England are delighted to offer...

COVID-19: Dealing with fraudulent applications for the Bounce Back Loan Scheme 21 COVID-19: Dealing with fraudulent applications for the Bounce Back Loan Scheme 22
Finance13 hours ago

COVID-19: Dealing with fraudulent applications for the Bounce Back Loan Scheme

By Ed Lloyd, EVP Global Head of Sales, Encompass The COVID-19 pandemic is still having a devastating impact on businesses...

EU Commission sets out new intellectual property action plan affecting SEPs, patent pooling and EU design protection 23 EU Commission sets out new intellectual property action plan affecting SEPs, patent pooling and EU design protection 24
Business13 hours ago

EU Commission sets out new intellectual property action plan affecting SEPs, patent pooling and EU design protection

By Andrew White, Partner and UK & European patent attorney at intellectual property firm, Mathys & Squire The EU Commission...

InsurTech is helping to drive the digital evolution of the UK motor retail industry 25 InsurTech is helping to drive the digital evolution of the UK motor retail industry 26
Technology14 hours ago

InsurTech is helping to drive the digital evolution of the UK motor retail industry

By Alan Inskip, Tempcover CEO & Founder If the last nine months have made anything clear, it is that the...

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now