Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >THE RULES: INVOICE FINANCE WILL SOON BE A POSITIVE CASH MANAGEMENT OPTION OPEN TO ALL BUSINESSES
    Business

    The Rules: Invoice Finance Will Soon Be a Positive Cash Management Option Open to All Businesses

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on September 8, 2015

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    John Atkinson presents insights on upcoming changes to invoice finance rules, highlighting their potential benefits for SMEs struggling with late payments and cash flow issues.
    Business professional discussing invoice finance benefits for SMEs - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    The Government’s plans to relax invoice finance rules early next year is music to the ears of many small and medium-sized businesses whose growth has been held back by Britain’s late payment culture for far too long, reports John Atkinson.

    So-called ‘bans on assignment’ rules prevent smaller suppliers from using invoice finance as a source of funding. They are often imposed by bigger businesses when dealing with SME suppliers and have hampered the growth of small businesses for a number of years.

    The Asset Based Finance Association (ABFA) which represents the industry has been lobbying with the government in recent years to enforce these changes and transform attitudes towards invoice finance. Unpaid invoices are the biggest asset some small businesses have and the law has been unfairly stacked against them until now.

    Invoice finance is used by more than 44,000 UK businesses to fund working capital and alleviate the knock-on effect of late payments. This means that instead of having to wait 90 days to receive payment for the invoice, businesses can unlock the cash they need straightaway. Invoice finance companies provide businesses with the cash up front, based on the value of any unpaid invoices, minus a small fee for collecting the debt. However, ‘bans on assignment’ rules effectively means a company isn’t able to sell the invoice and the customer refuses to deal with an invoice finance provider when they issue the bill. These rules are particularly prevalent in the construction industry and have also impacted some SMEs looking to secure public sector contracts.

    John Atkinson

    John Atkinson

    While acknowledging invoice finance isn’t right for all, bans on assignment have contributed to a set of conditions that make doing business incredibly difficult for small and growing companies, particularly those that are trying to establish supply links with larger businesses. This change is long overdue and is an extremely positive step for the growth of Britain’s SMEs – it is part of the government’s wider Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act, which a number of measures are being introduced in 2016 to tackle late payments. It’s been predicted that £26bn is owed to Britain’s small businesses in unpaid invoices. The government is now set to appoint a new late payments commissioner to deal with supply chain bullying and late payers as well as the introduction of a conciliation service designed to assist small businesses in settling late payment issues and disputes.

    Unfortunately, Britain is riddled with a late payment culture. According to the ABFA, UK SMEs are now waiting an average of 72 days for payment of invoices – a day more than a year ago – despite the strengthening economic recovery.The impact of the recession has meant that the smallest businesses are now waiting an average of 11 days longer for payment than they were even at its height. Taken as a protective measure to safeguard their financial positions during the credit crunch, it became the norm for many businesses to pay late. In essence, the longer firms are able to hold onto money and keep cash in the business, it allows them to strengthen their position and make funds work harder. However, its Britain’s small businesses that have felt the brunt of this.

    The recession has created a cautious business culture and companies are now more conscious of spending than ever. For many fledgling start-ups and small enterprises that are often cash poor, this is detrimental to growth. They simply cannot wait up-to 72 days to fund a weekly wage and cover overheads so it is wholly positive that the new government is taking proactive measures to address this.

    To ensure they’re compliant, larger businesses should review existing contracts and use the ‘ban on assignments’ as an opportunity to be more transparent and open about their terms. Big businesses can demonstrate they are willing to take a more collaborative approach and treat SME suppliers fairly through communicating their intentions and publishing information about the prompt payment of bills. For larger firms that practice late payment, time is running out and they now need to adapt practices or risk suffering reputational damage in the future.

    It is likely that the majority of SMEs in a contract with a larger firm aren’t aware of this incoming change. For those small businesses experiencing cash flow issues due to late payment, new options will soon exist which could help them to grow and plan ahead with a more confident cash position. Businesses should act now to review any existing agreements and negotiate terms to remove the restrictions. Although large companies have a role to play in raising awareness of the change, some may not do so proactively.

    It’s important that the government and industry continues to raise awareness of the impact of late payments and does its upmost to support SMEs. As part of these efforts, the logical next step might be for the government to outlaw those businesses that pay beyond 90 days. Research conducted amongst our clients revealed that some of the worst offenders take up to 121 days to pay which is simply not acceptable. SMEs are widely regarded as the backbone of the UK economy, which their growth holds the key to a long-term economic recovery. Late payment and ‘bans on assignment’ have been allowed to hamper that growth and this is a positive first step for businesses.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostWHO Really Makes the Decisions?
    Next Business PostPrison, Fines & Reputational Damage – the Cost of Poor Test Data Management