Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

The future of Equity Trading

By Adam Matuszewski, head of equities at the Swiss Stock Exchange 

The operational resiliency and bandwidth at stock exchanges and market infrastructures have been tested by Covid-19, although the industry – so far – appears to have largely overcome many of the challenges being thrown at it. Despite the massive spikes in trading volumes and heightened volatility, market participants have held firm, even though most of their staff are being forced to work from home. Though this crisis is still far from over, a new normal is beginning to emerge. Adam Matuszewski, head of equities at the Swiss Stock Exchange, shares his insights into some of the major trends that will impact the industry over the course of 2020 and beyond.

The Economy and Equities 

The recent crisis has shaken up the economy, negatively affecting many industries. For some businesses a V-shaped recovery is expected, for others the outlook is much more gloomy. The unemployment rate in the US hit an all-time high of 14.7 percent in April and a number of developed economies are expected to slide into recession in 2020. In response to significant economic slowdown, governments have rushed to support the economy and businesses through numerous stimulus packages. On top of this, many central banks worldwide have slashed interest rates with the Fed cutting them down to zero and the Bank of England (BOE) to 0.1 percent. In general, government support and access to cheaper capital make many companies more likely to continue growing, investing in new projects, paying dividends to shareholders or undertaking share buy-backs. Further, the equity market is likely to see greater capital inflows as other investment opportunities such as fixed income or holding cash are less attractive.

 Changing Equity Trading Market Structures 

The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) reshaped the equity market structure over the past 2 years. New sources of liquidity emerged such as systematic internalisers (SIs) that operate alongside the existing ecosystem of regulated markets and multilateral trading facilities (MTFs). Further, MiFID II regulation imposed measures to drive liquidity to lit order books. For example, limitations on dark trading (the so called double volume caps (DVCs)), were supposed to suppress the amount of dark trading in Europe. So far, we have seen that DVCs have triggered the creation of new market models such as frequent batch auctions and have fuelled demand for block executions. While MiFID II was supposed to support best execution, the regulation has contributed to further fragmentation of the market through a proliferation of new trading venues and market models. On one hand, fragmentation is good for market participants as it increases competition and drives down trading costs. However, on the other hand, fragmentation increases the cost of searching for – and finding – liquidity. It is hard to say which is the more dominant at this point in time.

Interestingly, only 26 months into MiFID II, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) launched a consultation paper to review the existing MiFID II equity transparency framework. This has sent shock waves across the industry as ESMA proposals, if implemented, would significantly impact liquidity formation and routing practices. The consultation paper touches on many areas such as dark trading, use of frequent batch auctions, SI regime and the scope of Share Trading Obligation. The responses to the consultation from the industry significantly differ among the buy-side, sell-side and exchange operators. The whole industry is waiting in anticipation for ESMA’s evaluation of feedback to its consultation paper as its future actions are likely to define the market structure for equities in the years ahead.

 What does the future hold? 

Macroeconomic factors will strongly impact the equity market in the next couple of years. We are likely to see higher volatility levels compared with the ones in 2018-2019. A low interest rate environment in developed economies is likely to persist for some time, making equities an attractive choice for asset allocation. On the market structure side of things, we expect primary exchanges to hold their dominant liquidity profile in home markets. The level of fragmentation may marginally decrease as participants settle on a few venues of their choosing. Regulatory efforts to draw liquidity onto lit markets have not been particularly successful so far but this may change depending on the outcomes of the ESMA consultation. Lastly, dark trading and its alternatives are unlikely to go away. We expect to see a further growth in demand for block liquidity and, as a consequence, are looking to position our services to accommodate those needs.