Bernhard Lachenmeier, Head of Products and Marketing, SIX Payment Services
60 years ago debit cards were the face of payment innovation. The first online payment was made 20 years ago. Even mobile payments are 16 years old – in 1997, Coca Cola built vending machines which accepted payment by text message. It is understandable then that industry commentators are now searching for The Next Big Thing in payments. For many, this looks set to be payments via Near-Field Communication or NFC.
It’s easy to see why contactless is an attractive payment option – the ability to simply ‘tap and go’ would both simplify and speed-up the payment process. Good news for increasingly busy consumers, great news for retailers – the less consumers have to think about the payment process, the less likely they are to question the payment value. Quicker payments equal more payments.
Many retailers have already realised the great potential of contactless payments. The Co-Operative Group recently became the latest retail chain to announce a roll-out of contactless payment terminals across the UK, following the likes of Boots and Superdrug. There are even retailers already experiencing a customer transition towards ‘tap and go’ – Pret A Manger recently announced a 15% rise in contactless payment transactions made in their stores over the past 12 months.
Yet the area where contactless payments are set to really make a difference is in the transport sector. Transport for London has been a keen advocate of NFC technology, introducing the contactless Oyster Card payment system on the London Underground in July 2003. By June 2012, over 43 million Oyster cards had been issued and more than 80% of all journeys on public transport in London were made using the card. Transport for London recently made another bold move in the NFC payment space, introducing NFC bank card payment capability across the London bus network at the end of 2012. This month it was revealed that Londoners have paid for more than 700,000 bus fares using their contactless bank cards since the option for contactless payment was introduced just three months ago.
The contactless Age
The support for contactless payments in the retail and transport markets, not to mention the clear consumer demand as illustrated by the pick-up across London, suggests that the age of the ‘tap and go’ payment is upon us. Yet still many question whether NFC will ever really take off. The London Olympics were heralded as ‘the first contactless Olympic Games’, yet Visa’s figures show that just 15% of those with contactless cards opted to use them at the London 2012 Games.
Visa’s figures reflect a wider pattern in consumer attitudes towards contactless. According to the UK Cards Association, as of January 2013 there were 31.3 million contactless cards in the UK. What’s more, according to ICM Research, the awareness level of contactless cards is 80% – this means that most consumers are fully aware of the contactless payments capabilities of their cards. Yet the same research tells us that just one-third of contactless card holders have ever actually made a ‘tap and go’ payment.
Mind the gap
The numbers clearly show that a high percentage of consumers not only have NFC-enabled payment cards, but they also are aware of contactless payments and understand their ability to make such payments. That’s not all. There are currently over 143,800 contactless terminals in the UK – so there is suitable opportunity for consumers to try out this new-found payment technology.
It is clear then that questions need to be asked around what will persuade consumers to make the jump from understanding contactless, to actually being comfortable using contactless.
Dispelling the NFC myths
Firstly we need to accept that while innovation and technology often aim to simplify our lives, in reality any change to the way we handle our money will always be met with a level of suspicion. It is unsurprising then that a number of urban myths have come to dominate the discourse of contactless payments – tales of ‘electronic pickpockets’ and the potential to steal card details simply by walking past someone with an NFC-enabled card are enough to put many off the technology. The fact remains, however, that these rumours are, as yet, unfounded. This is why it is essential that retailers, card issuers and payment processors alike join forces to run a dedicated education campaign to dispel these negative claims.
One of the greatest barriers to contactless uptake lies in the current retailer experience. Cashiers are the people on the front-line of this new payment technology, so a large part of the campaign must focus on ensuring that they understand and actively encourage customers to make use of their new ‘tap and go’ capability. Few things are more embarrassing to the British customer than getting to the front of a queue in a shop and being unable to pay – even if it is just while they become accustomed to the new technology! Improving the customer service at contactless terminals will help overcome this nervousness of the unknown.
The future is digital
The payment ecosystem is in a constant state of flux – from cattle to coins to cards, payments, much like humans, have evolved. The modern day consumer demands convenience and speed in their day-to-day payments. We live in a world in which we rely ever more on our plastic payment cards – according to the UK Cards Association, UK consumers spent £3.3 billion more using plastic in December 2012 than in December 2011 – so it stands to reason that using these cards in a contactless capacity will be the natural next step.
Card schemes, banks and merchants need to work together on an education programme, dispelling the NFC myths and encouraging greater customer service at contactless payment points. Consider this final point: contactless payment cards were introduced in the same year as the iPhone was launched. The payment technology has moved on – now it’s the turn of us humans to do some evolving.
Does your institution have operational resilience? Testing cyber resilience may be a good way to find out
By Callum Roxan, Head of Threat Intelligence, F-Secure
If ever 2020 had a lesson, it was that no organization can possibly prepare for every conceivable outcome. Yet building one particular skill will make any crisis easier to handle: operational resilience.
Many financial institutions have already devoted resources to building operational resilience. Unfortunately, this often takes what Miles Celic, Chief Executive Officer of TheCityUK, calls a “near death” experience for this conversion to occur. “Recent years have seen a number of cases of loss of reputation, reduced enterprise value and senior executive casualties from operational incidents that have been badly handled,” he wrote.
But it need not take a disaster to learn this vital lesson.
“Operational resilience means not only planning around specific, identified risks,” Charlotte Gerken, the executive director of the Bank of England, said in a 2017 speech on operational resilience. “We want firms to plan on the assumption that any part of their infrastructure could be impacted, whatever the reason.” Gerken noted that firms that had successfully achieved a level of resilience that survives a crisis had established the necessary mechanisms to bring the business together to respond where and when risks materialised, no matter why or how.
We’ll talk about the bit we know best here; by testing for cyber resilience, a company can do more than prepare for the worst sort of attacks it may face. This process can help any business get a clearer view of how it operates, and how well it is prepared for all kinds of surprises.
Assumptions and the mechanisms they should produce are the best way to prepare for the unknown. But, as the boxer Mike Tyson once said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” The aim of cyber resilience is to build an effective security posture that survives that first punch, and the several that are likely to follow. So how can an institution be confident that they’ve achieved genuine operational resilience?
This requires an organization to honestly assess itself through the motto inscribed at the front of the Temple of Delphi: “Know thyself.” And when it comes to cyber security, there is a way for an organization to test just how thoroughly it comprehends its own strengths and weaknesses.
The Bank of England was the first central bank to help develop the framework for institutions to test the integrity of their systems. CBEST is made up of controlled, bespoke, intelligence-led cyber security tests that replicate behaviours of those threat actors, and often have unforeseen or secondary benefits. Gerken notes that the “firms that did best in the testing tended to be those that really understood their organisations. They understood their own needs, strengths and weaknesses, and reflected this in the way they built resilience.”
In short, testing cyber resilience can provide clear insight into an institution’s operational resilience in general.
Gaining that specific knowledge without a “near-death” experience is obviously a significant win for any establishment. And testing for operational resilience throughout the industry can provide some reminders of the steps every organization should take so that testing provides unique insists about their institution, and not just a checklist of cyber defence basics.
The IIF/McKinsey Cyber Resilience Survey of the financial services industry released in March lasy year provided six sets of immediate actions that institutions could take to improve their cyber security posture. The toplines of these recommendations were:
- Do the basics, patch your vulnerabilities.
- Review your cloud architecture and security capabilities.
- Reduce your supply chain risk.
- Practice your incident response and recovery capabilities.
- Set aside a specific cyber security budget and prioritise it
- Build a skilled talent pool and optimize resources through automation.
But let’s be honest: If simply reading a solid list of recommendations created cyber resilience, cyber criminals would be out of business. Unfortunately, cyber crime as a business is booming and threat actors targeting essential financial institutions through cyber attacks are likely earning billions in the trillion dollar industry of financial crime.A list can’t reveal an institution’s unique weaknesses, those security failings and chokepoints that could shudder operations, not just during a successful cyber attack but during various other crises that challenge their operations. And the failings that lead to flaws in an institution’s cyber defence likely reverberate throughout the organization as liabilities that other crises would likely expose.
The best way to get a sense of operational resilience will always be to simulate the worst that attackers can summon. That’s why the time to test yourself is now, before someone else does.
Thomson Reuters to stress AI, machine learning in a post-pandemic world
By Kenneth Li and Nick Zieminski
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Thomson Reuters Corp will streamline technology, close offices and rely more on machines to prepare for a post-pandemic world, the news and information group said on Tuesday, as it reported higher sales and operating profit.
The Toronto-headquartered company will spend $500 million to $600 million over two years to burnish its technology credentials, investing in AI and machine learning to get data faster to professional customers increasingly working from home during the coronavirus crisis.
It will transition from a content provider to a content-driven technology company, and from a holding company to an operational structure.
Thomson Reuters’ New York- and Toronto-listed shares each gained more than 8%.
It aims to cut annual operating expenses by $600 million through eliminating duplicate functions, modernizing and consolidating technology, as well as through attrition and shrinking its real estate footprint. Layoffs are not a focus of the cost cuts and there are no current plans to divest assets as part of this plan, the company said.
“We look at the changing behaviors as a result of COVID … on professionals working from home working remotely being much more reliant on 24-7, digital always-on, sort of real-time always available information, served through software and powered by AI and ML (machine learning),” Chief Executive Steve Hasker said in an interview.
Sales growth is forecast to accelerate in each of the next three years compared with 1.3% reported sales growth for 2020, the company said in its earnings release.
Thomson Reuters, which owns Reuters News, said revenues rose 2% to $1.62 billion, while its operating profit jumped more than 300% to $956 million, reflecting the sale of an investment and other items.
Its three main divisions, Legal Professionals, Tax & Accounting Professionals, and Corporates, all showed higher organic quarterly sales and adjusted profit. As part of the two-year change program, the corporate, legal and tax side will operate more as one customer-facing entity.
Adjusted earnings per share of 54 cents were ahead of the 46 cents expected, based on data from Refinitiv.
The company raised its annual dividend by 10 cents to $1.62 per share.
The Reuters News business showed lower revenue in the fourth quarter. In January, Stephen J. Adler, Reuters’ editor-in-chief for the past decade, said he would retire in April from the world’s largest international news provider.
Thomson Reuters also said its stake in The London Stock Exchange is now worth about $11.2 billion.
The LSE last month completed its $27-billion takeover of data and analytics business Refinitiv, 45%-owned by Thomson Reuters.
(Reporting by Ken Li, writing by Nick Zieminski in New York, editing by Louise Heavens and Jane Merriman)
Putting data protection back on the financial agenda
By Wim Stoop, CDP Customer and Product Director, Cloudera
Despite the wave of changes that Brexit has brought financial organisations, from the end of ‘passporting’ to uncertainty over the longer-term equivalence rules, one thing has remained a constant — data privacy regulations are a core responsibility to protect sensitive data and mitigate data breaches. From PSD2 to GDPR, financial institutions need to ensure they are still processing and transferring data in accordance with the industry’s stringent rules and regulations. If not, they risk fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of their company’s annual global turnover.
As the stakes get higher, the amount of data which financial enterprises are having to deal with is on the rise too. In fact, research by IDC estimated that businesses created and captured 6.4 zettabytes of new data last year alone. This increase in data production has linked to the pandemic and the move to remote working. Replacing face-to-face interactions with online communications has meant that financial businesses suddenly had to cope with a larger amount of data flowing through their networks. In addition, employees working from home are increasingly doing so on potentially unsecured devices, outside of the corporate network, risking exposure and data breaches according to numerous cybersecurity reports.
With an extensive stock of sensitive customer data and so many regulations to keep on top of, remaining compliant can feel overwhelming for financial organisations. However, this shouldn’t be the case. Today we often see businesses trying to retrofit data protection strategies, or take a reactive approach to external forces. Instead, they should be taking a proactive stance on data management. In doing so, security becomes a natural side-effect and financial companies can operate with the assurance that no matter what new regulations come into play, they are compliant. The question is, how to achieve this?
Taking a proactive approach to data privacy
To remain compliant, financial institutions need to get on top of their data. When data is sat in siloes, on legacy systems, it’s inaccessible to all and it becomes a challenge to identify what is sensitive and what isn’t. Poorly managed data can’t be protected and the risk of data breaches increases. By contrast, when properly controlled and stored, it becomes easy to apply data security rules.
From customer names and contact details to transaction records and PINs, financial organisations hold a lot of personal and financial data on customers. However, the trick is understanding that all data holds varying degrees of sensitivity and thus, needs to be managed accordingly. For instance, a customer’s bank account details are more sensitive, compared to their basic personal data, such as name and address, which are usually publicly accessible. By proactively identifying, prioritising and classifying data by its degree of sensitivity, financial companies can apply any and all data protection rules that are necessary, such as restricting certain users from accessing highly confidential information.
Yet, this identification process is often looked at as a reactive measure by many financial businesses. The challenge in proactive data management lies in an organisation’s ability to eliminate the frictions it has in tracking, identifying and classifying information, as opposed to doing so retrospectively. After all, data classification plays a vital role in ensuring data protection is upheld.
A proactive approach is integral to effective data management and governance. The first step in achieving this approach involves creating a data marketplace, or a curated, secured and governed data repository. Having something like a data marketplace in place means that as soon as data enters an organisation, enterprises can determine its degree of sensitivity, how it should be managed, and which analytics need to be run, to extract the most value out of the data.
Once these steps are taken, compliance and data privacy happen almost naturally and become ingrained in the business. When companies are aware of every single piece of data in their possession, they can know exactly how it’s being protected. Such a robust strategy ensures that institutions meet the high standards of trust that their customers have bestowed upon them in protecting their personal data. And, with this level of control, enterprises can avoid data lockout, reduce friction for employees, and optimise the value they unlock from their data. At the same time, they can have the peace of mind that they are compliant and protected.
A business-ready solution for data protection
With so many rules and regulations to keep track of, data protection shouldn’t be another worry to add to the list. Financial companies can maximise the efficacy of their existing security and governance strategies by applying it to all datasets across the enterprise – whether that be on-premise, in the cloud, or a combination of the two. In particular, as a scalable and low-cost solution, organisations are increasingly turning to the cloud for their data management needs. It’s expected that over half (51%) of business data will be stored in the cloud by 2024.
This is where an enterprise data cloud (EDC) really shows it’s worth, allowing financial companies to keep their data protected, compliant, and successfully governed. Simply put, an EDC is a hybrid and multi-cloud platform that harnesses analytics at every stage of the data lifecycle. It enables organisations to extract the true value of their data while still providing a consistent layer of security.
An EDC gives financial businesses a single source of truth, built on technology that operates on any cloud environment and right through to the edge. Armed with an EDC, companies have complete visibility over their data, no matter where it resides in the enterprise or the data lifecycle, easing the task of managing and protecting data. On top of this, an EDC supports a variety of data functions, including the data marketplace, and works to provide control, visibility and examination over data. With all these aspects working together, financial institutions can ensure that all data which passes through their infrastructure and into the data marketplace is efficiently governed and protected.
Bringing technology, people, and process together
Technological solutions, like an EDC, work at their maximum potential when they are in harmony with people and process. But, the triad has been thrown off balance by the rise of remote working and reduction in staff numbers. While all businesses recognise that sensitive data needs to be encrypted and access should be restricted, this has been a difficult feat as employees work from home and use devices outside of the traditional network security parameters. In fact, nearly half (48%) of employees are less likely to follow safe data practices when working from home. This will exponentially increase the risk of data breaches.
In addition, with almost a fifth (18%) of the UK workforce on furlough and team numbers shrinking, companies don’t have the same amount of manpower to validate both the systems being used, as well as the data being run in these systems, to ensure that they are compliant. Within the office environment, organisations were able to create ‘islands of perfect governance’, with all departments being aware of the applications used to manage data and therefore, guaranteeing higher levels of compliance. However, these safety nets have collapsed during home working and it’s become more difficult to ensure the security and privacy of data within an enterprise.
What’s needed here is an overarching framework that provides a standard for data governance. This is enabled by having the right technology solution, a proactive approach to data management and people within a business supporting it from the bottom up in place — forming a triad that works in perfect harmony. A framework such as this also enables enterprises to assess what they need to do to create data protection rules internally that ensure compliance, and allows employees to self-check their data security protocols eliminating any uncertainty about protecting sensitive data.
It is important to remember that the right technology alone won’t make people compliant – whether they are working in an office or remotely. Rather, as pointed out above, it is technology, people, and process, working in sync, that will ensure that regulations are adhered to and data is managed and protected.
Long-lasting success with data protection
With data volumes growing and remote working creating security vulnerabilities, financial businesses need to get on top of their data from the get-go. By proactively identifying sensitive data, accurately securing it, and delivering trusted data to end-users, the right data can be put into the hands of the right people.
Creating a watertight data privacy strategy requires financial organisations to deliver a uniform approach to data management and protection across departments to ensure compliance. In addition, harnessing technology, such as an EDC, will provide visibility and control over sensitive data, enabling financial institutions to unlock real-time insights from their data while still providing a consistent layer of security. With technology, people and process in harmony, enterprises can operate with the confidence that their data is being managed successfully and they are compliant with both existing and new regulations.
Former BOJ executive calls for ‘genuine’ review of central bank stimulus
By Leika Kihara and Takahiko Wada TOKYO (Reuters) – The Bank of Japan must abandon the view it can influence...
Britain’s Heathrow sinks to $2.8 billion loss during pandemic
LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s Heathrow Airport plunged to a 2 billion pound ($2.8 billion) annual loss after passenger numbers collapsed...
Puma forecasts strong rebound from end of second quarter
BERLIN (Reuters) – German sportswear company Puma said on Wednesday it expects a heavy impact on its results from lockdowns...
Vodafone’s Vantage Towers announces intention to float
LONDON (Reuters) – Vantage Towers, the mobile infrastructure company spun out of Vodafone Group, on Wednesday announced its intention to...
Strong exports, construction boost German economy in fourth quarter
BERLIN (Reuters) – Bullish exports and solid construction activity helped the German economy to grow by a stronger-than-expected 0.3% in...
Metro Bank expects defaults to rise as COVID-19 support measures fade out
(Reuters) – Metro Bank posted a much bigger annual loss on Wednesday and said it expects defaults to rise through...
UK’s Sunak could extend stamp duty holiday until June-end – The Times
(Reuters) – British finance minister Rishi Sunak is preparing to extend the stamp duty holiday by three months until the...
As We Get Back to the Future of Work, Banks Must Embrace WhatsApp
By Shaun Hurst, Technical Director, Smarsh If you had told me a year ago that the world’s major financial services...
Lloyds profits fall as it targets wealth push
LONDON (Reuters) – Lloyds Banking Group reported a sharp fall in profits for 2020 but resumed paying a dividend, as...
How to give your investment portfolio a Spring clean
By Alexander Joshi, Behavioural Finance Specialist, Barclays Private Bank Spring is often a time of optimism and change, and in...