Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

MONEYBALL: HERE’S WHO YOU COULD HAVE SIGNED…

Zopa calculates the players your team could have bought if they’d kept the cash they spent on transfer flops

Peer-to-peer lending pioneer, Zopa, today reveals the players that Premier League teams could have had on their shopping lists this summer, if only they had chosen to invest their money in previous windows rather than splash out on expensive failures.

Around this time every year, football fans up and down the country urge managers and chairmen to put their hands in their pockets and invest additional transfer funds in new talent to improve their team’s prospects. But not every big-money move goes to plan: for every Thierry Henry or Eric Cantona there is an Andy Carroll, Fernando Torres or Andriy Shevchenko.

Zopa has calculated exactly how much these transfer fees would now be worth today had the clubs involved lent rather than spent. After earning an average 5% interest for each of the intervening years, the players available make for far more attractive reading than their less illustrious predecessors.

For example, had Manchester City chosen to invest the £24 million they spent on Joleon Lescott in the summer of 2009, they would now be sitting on over £30 million. This summer, that could instead have brought in Spanish maestro Cesc Fabregas, who instead moved to Chelsea. Similarly, Chelsea splashed out £50 million on Fernando Torres in January 2011, but with interest that fee would now be worth £59.5 million: enough to have bought them Angel Di Maria in this summer’s window.

Here are 11 transfer flops from recent years, along with the players that their transfer fees could have been used for today:

Who they boughtTransfer FeeDateYears agoValue today£ Earned% IncreaseWho they could buy today
Michael Owen (Newcastle)£16m24/08/058.99£24.8m£8.8m55.1%Adam Lallana, £25m (Liverpool)
Khalid Boulahrouz (Chelsea)£8.5m30/06/068.14£12.6m£4.1m48.8%Alberto Moreno, £12m (Liverpool)
Craig Gordon (Sunderland)£9m31/08/076.98£12.6m£3.7m40.6%Jan Oblak, £12.6m (Atletico Madrid)
Jose Bosingwa (Chelsea)£16.2m13/05/086.28£22m£5.8m35.8%Dejan Lovren, £20m (Liverpool)
Dimitar Berbatov (Man Utd)£30.75m31/08/085.98£41.1m£10.4m33.9%Alexis Sanchez, £35m (Arsenal)
Joleon Lescott (Man City)£24m25/08/094.99£30.6m£6.6m27.6%Cesc Fabregas, £30m (Chelsea)
Aleksandar Kolarov (Man City)£16m24/07/104.08£19.5m£3.5m22.0%Filipe Luis, £20m (Chelsea)
Fernando Torres (Chelsea)£50m31/01/20113.56£59.5m£9.5m19%Angel Di Maria, £59.7m (Man United)
Darren Bent (Aston Villa)£24m31/01/113.56£28.5m£4.5m19.0%Romelu Lukaku, £28m (Everton)
Stewart Downing (Liverpool)£20m13/07/113.11£23.3m£3.3m16.4%Toni Kroos, £24m (Real Madrid)
Erik Lamela (Spurs)£30m30/08/130.98£31.5m£1.5m4.9%Diego Costa, £32m (Chelsea)

Figure based on 5% annualised interest compounded once a year

MONEYBALL: HERE’S WHO YOU COULD HAVE SIGNED… 1Giles Andrews, Zopa CEO and co-founder, comments: “Spending isn’t always the best option, as this list of transfers all-too-clearly shows. If these clubs had shown a little patience and instead lent their money at an average interest rate of 5% over time, they would have some very attractive prospects on the table this season. With interest rates and ISAs at many banks in an offside position against inflation, reliable alternatives like Zopa are providing predictable and better returns for consumers who are prepared to think outside the banks.”

Zopa, the world’s first peer-to-peer lender has now lent over £600m in peer-to-peer loans by providing better rates for both lenders and borrowers since it was founded in 2005.