Connect with us


Is the Coronavirus Rocking the Foundations of Capital Markets?



Is the Coronavirus Rocking the Foundations of Capital Markets? 1

CFA Institute publishes new report and global member[1] survey that analyses the impact of COVID-19 on the global economy and the investment management industry

A new report by CFA Institute, the global association of investment management professionals, analyses the effects of the current economic crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic on the global economy, the capital markets, the investment management industry, as well as assessing the responses from fiscal and monetary governmental entities.

“CFA Institute brings the unique ability to survey our global membership — expert practitioners who work in literally every corner of the globe — to gauge the impact of the pandemic, which quickly caused the markets to crash in all senses,” said Margaret Franklin, CFA, President and CEO, CFA Institute. “In this report, we detail our members’ latest thinking on the impact which the virus has had on our core constituent base, which is global investment management, looking specifically at the economic situation and the shape of the recovery, market volatility, price formation, the significance of regulatory responses and much more.”

“The lockdown has had a massive effect on the markets and in terms of the recovery, our members are more cautious on the form it will take compared with others in the financial services industry who have been more bullish. When it comes to the effect of volatility on their strategic asset allocation, a clear majority of respondents have reported their firms are either adopting a ‘wait and see’ approach with their portfolios or have made no changes. The differences in the impact and response form the industry across developed and developing markets which this survey reveals will be key as the Coronavirus story unfolds in the coming months,” said Olivier Fines, CFA, Head of Advocacy EMEA, and author of the report. “Among the most concerning indicators is that the current crisis carries with it a significant risk of specific asset mispricing, due to liquidity dislocation and the intervention of authorities potentially influencing price formation. The pressure which the current crisis poses to professionals in terms of their professional conduct is also of concern; 45% of respondents believe that it is likely that the current crisis will result in unethical actions in the investment management industry. Of note, a majority thought that regulation of market conduct should not be relaxed in this crisis, which is a positive reflection of the ethical professionalism of the membership.”

The report, Is the Coronavirus Rocking the Foundations of Capital Markets, also analyses regional data, per country. The report highlights the following UK themes and statistics from the survey:

  • On asset mispricing: A resounding 96% of respondents in the UK (and 96% globally) believe the crisis could result in specific asset mispricing, specifically related to the current situation. UK respondents indicated that this was driven by two underlying factors: liquidity dislocation (38%), and distortion of natural market pricing due to government intervention (39%).
  • On the shape of a potential economic recovery: 44% of respondents in the UK (and 44% globally) see a medium-term ‘hockey stick’ shaped recovery, which implies some level of stagnation for the next two to three years until signs of recovery are visible. 31% of UK respondents opted for a slow U-shaped recovery, which would indicate 3-5 years of moderate pick-up in activity before clearer signs of acceleration. Most respondents globally and in the UK sit at the conservative end of the spectrum, in comparison to several industry and banking CEOs, who have so far appeared more optimistic.
  • On market volatility: 75% of UK respondents (and 75% globally) are either still analysing volatility before making a decision on strategic asset allocation or are not seeing any significant impact yet. The remaining 25% of UK respondents have significantly modified their strategic allocations. Globally, portfolios shifted more due to volatility jitters in Latin America (44%) and South East Asia (38%) than respondents in Europe and North America.
  • On market liquidity: For investment-grade corporate bonds in developed markets, 77% of respondents in the UK (and 75% globally) believe liquidity is down, with central bank intervention steadying the downward trajectory overall. Central bank intervention is perceived to have been more impactful in corporate and sovereign bonds in developed markets than for equities. Only a minority of UK respondents think that we are facing a severe liquidity shock, which could result in fire sales and dislocation. Liquidity in global developed market equities seems to have suffered less from the market rout, with 41% of UK respondents believing the level of liquidity has dropped.
  • On interventionism of governments and central banks: The majority of UK and global respondents indicated that this was a major stabilising factor. Fifty-seven per cent of UK respondents feel that the current state aid will be insufficient and will need to continue, and 40% feel that this aid should be a short-term measure to allow a deleveraging accompanied by fiscal rigour.
  • On the regulatory response: 59% of UK respondents (and 50% globally) believe that conduct regulation should not be relaxed to encourage trading and liquidity (22% thought that it should be relaxed), with 77% of UK respondents suggesting that regulators should actively seek the appropriate response through consultation with industry. Additionally, respondents hold strong views on what regulators should and should not do:
  • 73% believe that companies that receive emergency support during the crisis should not pay dividends or compensate executives with bonuses
  • A ban on short-selling should not be considered (80%)
  • A review of ETFs activity during the crisis should be initiated to determine the nature of their potential systemic impact (88%)
  • Regulators should focus on investor education about the risk of investor fraud in times of crisis (94%) as well as continued market surveillance (80%)
  • Regulators should not consider imposing security market holidays (81%). However, more than a third of UK respondents feel regulators should temporarily permit companies to delay reporting on changes in their financial conditions (37%).
  • On ethics in times of crisis: Forty-five per cent of UK members think it is likely that the crisis will result in unethical behaviour in the investment management industry, with 30% neutral and 29% disagreeing. The global data shows that less developed markets generally perceive a higher risk in this regard.
  • The impact of the crisis on asset management, the role of finance and globalisation: Equally as important, members are first of all predicting large-scale bankruptcies (459% frequency of UK responses) and also an acceleration of automation to reduce costs (42%). Further consolidation was also a theme in the UK and globally, as well as divergence between emerging and developed markets, and a potential reduction in the globalization of financial markets.
  • Whether the crisis is changing anything on the active versus passive debate: 44% of UK respondents believe it is unlikely that the crisis will reverse the steady shift into passive investments.
  • On members’ employment situation: while it is too early to predict the longer-term effects on employment, 44% of UK respondents see no change in their firm’s hiring plans, and 46% report a hiring freeze, with only 10% reporting downsizing.


How has the online trading landscape changed in 2020?



How has the online trading landscape changed in 2020? 2

By Dáire Ferguson, CEO, AvaTrade 

This year has been all about change following the outbreak of coronavirus and the subsequent global economic downturn which has impacted nearly every aspect of personal and business life. The online trading world has been no exception to this change as volatility in the financial markets has soared.

Although the global markets have been on a rollercoaster for some time with various geopolitical tensions, the market swings that we have witnessed since March have undoubtedly been unlike anything seen before. While these are indeed challenging times, for the online trading community, the increased volatility has proven tempting for those looking to profit handsomely.

However, with the opportunity to make greater profits also comes the possibility to make a loss, so how has 2020 changed the online trading landscape and how can retail investors stay safe?

Lockdown boost

Interest rates offered by banks and other traditional forms of consumer investments have been uninspiring for some time, but with the current economic frailty, the Bank of England cut interest rates to an all-time low. This has left many people in search of more exciting and rewarding ways to grow their savings which is indeed something online trading can provide.

When the pandemic hit earlier this year, it was widely reported that user numbers for online trading rocketed due to disappointing savings rates but also because the enforced lockdown gave more people the time to learn a new skill and educate themselves on online trading.

Dáire Ferguson

Dáire Ferguson

A volatile market certainly offers great scope for profit and new sources of revenue for those that are savvy enough to put their convictions to the test. However, where people stand the chance to profit greatly from market volatility, there is also the possibility to make a loss, particularly for those that are new to online trading or who are still developing their understanding of the market.

The sharp rise in online trading over lockdown paired with this year’s unpredictable global economy has led to some financial losses, but with a number of risk management tools now available this does not necessarily have to be the case.

Protect your assets

Although not yet widely available across the retail market, risk management tools are slowly becoming more prevalent and being offered by online traders as an extra layer of security for those seeking to trade in riskier climates.

There are a range of options available for traders, but amongst the common tools are “take profit” orders in conjunction with “stop loss” orders. A take profit order is a type of limit order that specifies the exact price for traders to close out an open position for a profit, and if the price of the security does not reach the limit price, the take profit order will not be fulfilled. A stop loss order can limit the trader’s loss on a security position by buying or selling a stock when it reaches a certain price.

Take profit and stop loss orders are good for mitigating risk, but for those that are new to the game or who would prefer extra support, there are even some risk management tools, such as AvaProtect, that provide total protection against loss for a defined period. This means that if the market moves in the wrong direction than originally anticipated, traders can recoup their losses, minus the cost of taking out the protection.

Not a day has gone by this year without the news prompting a change in the financial markets. Until a cure for the coronavirus is discovered, we are unlikely to return to ‘normal’ and the global markets will continue to remain highly volatile. In addition, later this year we will witness one of the most critical US presidential elections in history and the UK’s transition period for Brexit will come to an end. The outcome of these events may well trigger further volatility.

Of course, this may also encourage more people to dip their toes into online trading for a chance to profit. As more people take an interest and sign up to online trading platforms, providers will certainly look to increase or improve the risk management tools on offer to try and keep new users on board, and this could spell a new era for the online trading world.

Continue Reading


Trading Strategies



Trading Strategies 3

By Paddy Osborn, Academic Dean, London Academy of Trading

Whether you’re negotiating a business deal, playing a sport or trading financial markets, it’s vital that you have a plan. Top golfers will have a strategy to get around the course in the fewest number of shots possible, and without this plan, their score will undoubtedly be worse. It’s the same with trading. You can’t just open a trading account and trade off hunches and hopes. You need to create a structured and robust plan of attack. This will not only improve your profitability, but will also significantly reduce your stress levels during the decision-making process.

In my opinion, there are four stages to any trading strategy.

S – Set-up

T – Trigger

E – Execution

M – Management

Good trading performance STEMs from a structured trading process, so you should have one or more specific rules for each stage of this process.

Before executing any trades, you need to decide on your criteria for making your trading decisions. Should you base your trades off fundamental analysis, or maybe political news or macroeconomic data? If so, then you need to understand these subjects and how markets react to specific news events.

Alternatively, of course, there’s technical analysis, whereby you base your decisions off charts and previous price action, but again, you need a set of specific rules to enable you to trade with a consistent strategy. Many traders combine both fundamental and technical analysis to initiate their positions, which, I believe, has merit.


What needs to happen for you to say “Ah, this looks interesting! Here’s a potential trade.”? It may be a news event, a major macro data announcement (such as interest rates, employment data or inflation), or a chart level breakout. The key ingredient throughout is to fix specific and measurable rules (not rough guidelines that can be over-ridden on a whim with an emotional decision). For me, I may take a view on the potential direction of an asset (i.e. whether to be long or short) through fundamental analysis, but the actual execution of the trade is always technical, based off a very specific set of rules.

To take a simple example, let’s assume an asset has been trending higher, but has stopped at a certain price, let’s say 150. The chart is telling us that, although buyers are in long-term control, sellers are dominant at 150, willing to sell each time the price touches this level. However, the uptrend may still be in place, since each time the price pulls back from the 150 level, the selling is weaker and the price makes a higher short-term low. This clearly suggests that upward pressure remains, and there’s potential to profit from the uptrend if the price breaks higher.


Once you’ve found a potential new trade set-up, the next step is to decide when to pull the trigger on the trade. However, there are two steps to this process… finger on trigger, then pull the trigger to execute.

Paddy Osborn

Paddy Osborn

Continuing the example above, the trigger would be to buy if the price breaks above the resistance level at 150. This would indicate that the sellers at 150 have been exhausted, and the buyers have re-established control of the uptrend.  Also, it is often the case that after pause in a trend such as this, the pent-up buying returns and the price surges higher. So the trigger for this trade is a breakout above 150.


We have a finger on the trigger, but now we need to decide when to squeeze it. What if the price touches 150.10 for 10 seconds only? Has our resistance level broken sufficiently to execute the trade? I’d say not, so you need to set rules to define exactly how far the price needs to break above 150 – or for how long it needs to stay above 150 – for you to execute the trade. You’re basically looking for sufficient evidence that the uptrend is continuing. Of course, the higher the price goes (or the longer it stays above 150), the more confident you can be that the breakout is valid, but the higher price you will need to pay. There’s no perfect solution to this decision, and it depends on many things, such as the amount of other supporting evidence that you have, your levels of aggression, and so on. The critical point here is to fix a set of specific rules and stick to those rules every time.


Good trade management can save a bad trade, while poor trade management can turn an excellent trade entry into a loser. I could talk for days about in-trade management, since there are many different methods you can use, but the essential ingredient for every trade is a stop loss. This is an order to exit your position for a loss if the market doesn’t perform as expected. By setting a stop loss, you can fix your maximum risk on a trade, which is essential to preserving your capital and managing your overall risk limits. Some traders set their stop loss and target levels and let the trade run to its conclusion, while others manage their trades more actively, trailing stop losses, taking interim profits, or even adding to winning positions. No matter how you decide to manage each trade, it must be the same every time, following a structured and robust process.


The final step in the process is to review every trade to see if you can learn anything, particularly from your losing trades. Are you sticking to your trading rules? Could you have done better? Should you have done the trade in the first place? Only by doing these reviews will you discover any patterns of errors in your trading, and hence be able to put them right. In this way, it’s possible to monitor the success of your strategy. If your trades are random and emotional, with lots of manual intervention, then there’s no fixed process for you to review. You also need to be honest with yourself, and face up to your bad decisions in order to learn from them.

In this way, using a structured and robust trading strategy, you’ll be able to develop your trading skills – and your profits – without the stress of a more random approach.

Continue Reading


Economic recovery likely to prove a ‘stuttering’ affair



Economic recovery likely to prove a ‘stuttering’ affair 4

By Rupert Thompson, Chief Investment Officer at Kingswood

Equity markets continued their upward trend last week, with global equities gaining 1.2% in local currency terms. Beneath the surface, however, the recovery has been a choppy affair of late. China and the technology sector, the big outperformers year-to-date, retreated last week whereas the UK and Europe, the laggards so far this year, led the gains.

As for US equities, they have re-tested, but so far failed to break above, their post-Covid high in early June and their end-2019 level. The recent choppiness of markets is not that surprising given they are being buffeted by a whole series of conflicting forces.

Developments regarding Covid-19 as ever remain absolutely critical and it is a mixture of bad and good news at the moment. There have been reports of encouraging early trial results for a new treatment and potential vaccine but infection rates continue to climb in the US. Reopening has now been halted or reversed in states accounting for 80% of the population.

We are a long way away from a complete lockdown being re-imposed and these moves are not expected to throw the economy back into reverse. But they do emphasise that the economic recovery, not only in the US but also elsewhere, is likely to prove a ‘stuttering’ affair.

Indeed, the May GDP numbers in the UK undid some of the optimism which had been building recently. Rather than bouncing 5% m/m in May as had been expected, GDP rose a more meagre 1.8% and remains a massive 24.5% below its pre-Covid level in February.

Even in China, where the recovery is now well underway, there is room for some caution. GDP rose a larger than expected 11.5% q/q in the second quarter and regained all of its decline the previous quarter. However, the bounce back is being led by manufacturing and public sector investment, and the recovery in retail sales is proving much more hesitant.

China is not just a focus of attention at the moment because its economy is leading the global upturn but because of the increasing tensions with Hong Kong, the US and UK. UK telecoms companies have now been banned from using Huawei’s 5G equipment in the future and the US is talking of imposing restrictions on Tik Tok, the Chinese social media platform. While this escalation is not as yet a major problem, it is a potential source of market volatility and another, albeit as yet relatively small, unwelcome drag on the global economy.

Government support will be critical over coming months and longer if the global recovery is to be sustained. This week will be crucial in this respect for Europe and the US. The EU, at the time of writing, is still engaged in a marathon four-day summit, trying to reach an agreement on an economic recovery fund.  As is almost always the case, a messy compromise will probably end up being hammered out.

An agreement will be positive but the difficulty in reaching it does highlight the underlying tensions in the EU which have far from gone away with the departure of the UK. Meanwhile in the US, the Democrats and Republicans will this week be engaged in their own battle over extending the government support schemes which would otherwise come to an end this month.

Most of these tensions and uncertainties are not going away any time soon. Markets face a choppy period over the summer and autumn with equities remaining at risk of a correction.

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2020
2020 Global Banking & Finance Awards now open. Click Here

Latest Articles

Buying enterprise professional services: Five considerations for business leaders in turbulent times 5 Buying enterprise professional services: Five considerations for business leaders in turbulent times 6
Business32 mins ago

Buying enterprise professional services: Five considerations for business leaders in turbulent times

By James Sandoval, Founder and CEO,  MeasureMatch  The platformization of professional services provides businesses with direct, seamless access to the skills...

Wireless Connectivity Lights the Path to Bank Branch Innovation 7 Wireless Connectivity Lights the Path to Bank Branch Innovation 8
Technology1 hour ago

Wireless Connectivity Lights the Path to Bank Branch Innovation

By Graham Brooks, Strategic Account Director, Cradlepoint EMEA As consumers cautiously return to the UK high street in the past...

Financial Regulations: How do they impact your cloud strategy? 9 Financial Regulations: How do they impact your cloud strategy? 10
Technology1 hour ago

Financial Regulations: How do they impact your cloud strategy?

By Michael Chalmers, MD EMEA at Contino How exactly do financial regulations affect your cloud strategy? It’s a question many of...

Is It The Right Time To Invest In Gold? 11 Is It The Right Time To Invest In Gold? 12
Investing1 hour ago

Is It The Right Time To Invest In Gold?

By Zoe Lyons, Hatton Garden Metals The current climate is one of uncertainty, so it can be difficult to know...

Private public investment is more inter-dependant than ever 13 Private public investment is more inter-dependant than ever 14
Investing1 hour ago

Private public investment is more inter-dependant than ever

By Konstantin Sidorov, CEO and Founder of London Technology Club Today, one thing unites the majority of governments around the...

Post-COVID Mortgage Processing: Ripe for Intelligent Automation to Boost Organisational Resiliency 15 Post-COVID Mortgage Processing: Ripe for Intelligent Automation to Boost Organisational Resiliency 16
Technology2 hours ago

Post-COVID Mortgage Processing: Ripe for Intelligent Automation to Boost Organisational Resiliency

By Asheesh Mehra, Group CEO and Co-founder, AntWorks As seen in many other countries, the COVID-19 pandemic sent a shockwave through...

Understanding the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 17 Understanding the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 18
Business2 hours ago

Understanding the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020

By Katya Batchelor is a banking and finance lawyer at leading South East law firm Thomson Snell & Passmore  The...

Reuters Events Free Webinar – The Impact of The Pandemic On Executive Compensation 19 Reuters Events Free Webinar – The Impact of The Pandemic On Executive Compensation 20
Events4 hours ago

Reuters Events Free Webinar – The Impact of The Pandemic On Executive Compensation

Glass Lewis, CGLytics and the Council of Institutional Investors Identify Equity Portfolio Exposure to Governance Risks Join Reuters Events free...

Creating transparency and understanding between C-suite and F&A teams 22 Creating transparency and understanding between C-suite and F&A teams 23
Technology6 hours ago

Creating transparency and understanding between C-suite and F&A teams

By David Brightman, Director of Product Marketing at BlackLine There’s a stark disconnect between the promise of the cloud connected,...

Business recovery from COVID-19 lies in implementing the practice of Open Book Management 24 Business recovery from COVID-19 lies in implementing the practice of Open Book Management 25
Business1 day ago

Business recovery from COVID-19 lies in implementing the practice of Open Book Management

By Suranga Herath is CEO of English Tea Shop, the leading independent speciality and organic tea company. Over the course of the...

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now