Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

HSBC global asset management: How should investors interpret RMB Depreciation?

  • Recent spate of RMB weakness does not imply that the turmoil experienced in 2015 will be repeated again
  • Chinese corporates are better hedged against RMB depreciation than previously
  • Recent moved by Chinese authorities have minimised market panic

The recent spate of RMB weakness does not imply that the turmoil experienced in 2015 will be repeated again, according to Renee Chen, Senior Economist and Investment Strategist, HSBC Global Asset Management:

“The pace of RMB depreciation over the past couple of months has been remarkable, dropping faster than it did in 2015-16. However, in our opinion, this recent spate of RMB weakness does not imply that the turmoil experienced back then will be repeated again.

“The sharp weakening of RMB against both the USD and its peer basket since mid-June can be attributed to four key reasons:

  • A strong US dollar,
  • Widening interest rate differential amidst US-China monetary policy divergence,
  • Concerns over trade tensions,
  • Signs of slowing growth momentum in China.

“Moreover, the current RMB weakness comes after a nearly year long appreciation in the currency. To illustrate, the CNY CFETS index fell by slightly over 5% from its June high to 23 August, after rising by nearly 7% in one year before the sharp fall.

“There has been little evidence of significant capital outflows. Compared to the outflows seen in 2015-16, cross border outflows in the past two months have been moderate. We think Chinese corporates are now much better hedged against RMB depreciation.”

What is the outlook for RMB in the medium term?

“Sharp RMB devaluation or sale of US Treasury holdings as retaliatory tools remain off the table, given the potential adverse consequences to the Chinese economy.

“We expect monetary policy easing to increasingly focus on credit transmission to ensure reasonable credit growth, but not aggressive liquidity injection, which had recently pushed short-term market rates downwards and driven bond yields lower. Just the right amount of monetary policy easing, along with a more supportive fiscal policy in 2H18, should limit the downside on China rates and prevent the rate differentials from narrowing too quickly. Signs of stabilising Chinese economic momentum would also support investor sentiment.

“After tolerating sharp RMB depreciation in June-July, the PBoC recently stepped in to manage the risk of an adverse feedback loop from investors or corporate “herd behaviour” (echoing the 2015-16 experience). We think recent moves help contain the risk of triggering market panic and large-scale capital outflows, which would have added an extra layer of complexity in the bilateral trade negotiations.

“However, we do not expect aggressive FX intervention, given the long-term goal of allowing market forces (demand & supply) to play a major role in setting the RMB exchange rates and eventually moving toward a “clean/free float” FX regime as China continues to open up its economy and liberalise its capital markets in the longer term. Greater RMB flexibility in an uncertain external environment will allow monetary policy to focus more on domestic economic trends and policy agenda.”