Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

HOW WOULD WE POSITION PORTFOLIOS IF ANTICIPATING A LABOUR GOVERNMENT?

By Michael Stanes, Investment Director at Heartwood Investment Management 

Ever since the poor showing of the Conservatives in the General Election and the success of Labour, we have been considering the likely consequences for UK assets if we were to see a shift away from the political ‘centre’ to an administration favouring higher levels of state intervention. While another election is not yet on the horizon, the unpredictable state of British politics over the last couple of years leads us to consider such a scenario and its potential impact for portfolios, especially if we were to see a less corporate-friendly environment.

  • We would logically expect funding costs for the UK government to rise in anticipation of greater fiscal spending, gilt yields being likely to back up quite meaningfully. We would therefore keep our exposure here very controlled, as it is now, with very short duration.
  • We would be more cautious on the prospects for UK property, particularly the London commercial and residential markets. While we do have some exposure to the commercial market, we reduced this quite some time ago.
  • In equity, most of our exposure to UK indices is via large capitalisation companies listed in the UK but operating principally overseas. To that extent, the 70-80% of their aggregate revenues in overseas currencies would immediately boost sterling profits from a translation point of view, thereby providing something of a sterling hedge. We would expect more domestically-orientated sectors to be negatively impacted (particularly retail, banking, property shares as mentioned above, and utilities on renationalisation fears) and smaller company names in general to show more volatility.
  • The question of currency is perhaps the most difficult. While a run on the pound might be expected in the short term, we do start from a position of sterling having already depreciated considerably. To make a further move out of sterling at this point, we would therefore need to have a relatively high conviction that a Labour administration or agenda is going to come to pass.

In summary, we continue to be positioned quite cautiously in UK assets overall, as we have been for some two years now. This is evidenced by an underweight position in UK equity, a heavy skew to international companies listed in the UK compared to more domestic names, having short duration in UK gilts (and limited exposure to UK gilts in the first place), and our lowest exposure to UK property for five years.