Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

How Firms Value Alternative Datasets

By Rich Newman. SVP and Global Head of the Content and Technology Solutions (CTS) group at FactSet.

The rise in alternative data is an important trend to watch. By 2020, the alternative data industry is projected to be worth $350mm according to the AlterativeData.org. Alternative data (content derived from varied sources of information like images, billing statements, heat maps, social media interactions), has become an increasingly common consideration over the last five years, and offers a number of interesting new possibilities. Satellite data, for example, can provide real-time insight on car traffic to a business locations and indicate how a company is performing.

While data sets like fundamentals and benchmarks are still a critical part of the quantitative analyst tool kit, identifying how these core data sets are being used can shed light on the incorporation of new and novel feeds.  To determine which data sets are valued most today, FactSet partnered with Coleman Parkes to survey Heads/Directors/VPs of Quantitative Analysis, Senior Quantitative Analysts, Data Scientists, and Chief Data Officers from 50 hedge funds and institutional asset management firms across the U.S., EMEA, and APAC. The results provide insights into the types of data quantitative analysts value and use today, and what types they are likely to value more in the future.

Today’s Data Vs Tomorrow’s Data

Throughout our conversations with quants, the survey found that the core content and alternative data types most valued today are likely to change dramatically over the next several decades.

When survey respondents were asked which type of core content they currently value the most, 25% rank benchmarks first, prices closely follow at 23%, and fundamentals come in third at 21%.

core content rank by value (today)
core content rank by value (today)

However, among core content items respondents think will be valued most in the future, benchmarks fell to fifth place, while fundamentals and prices continued to rank high (first and second place, respectively).

core content rank by value (future)
core content rank by value (future)

Among other core content items, the ones that drop significantly from being highly valued now to less valued in the future include market aggregates, global sanctions, estimates, mergers and acquisitions, and private equity. Items that will be more valued in the future include corporate activism and governance, fixed income, industry and sector classifications, private company, and ownership core content.

alternate content rank by value(today)
alternate content rank by value(today)

The survey also asked respondents to pick the top five alternative data sets they found most valuable. Today, those datasets include business performance information, app installs, and digital footprints. However, when asked about future data sets they’d find valuable there were considerable differences among respondents. In the future, respondents expect to rely on ESG data, news, and shipping information; however, these are ranked much further down the list when it comes to the types of alternative data valued most now. Among alternative data types, others that also rise significantly from how they are valued now to how they will be valued in the future are supply chain analysis, geolocation, web traffic, and sentiment. Data types that fall significantly from how they are valued now to how they will be valued are credit scores, location information, and search trends.

alternate content rank by value(future)
alternate content rank by value(future)

Overall, core content and alternative data types that are valued in the future will be different than those valued now, according to the survey. However, it is the types of alternative data valued the most that are being shaken up and changing to a greater extent, whereas the types of core content used most today will not change as much in the future.

Take Aways

Alternative data is becoming more mainstream and important to the broader field of traditional asset managers, as opposed to just hedge fund managers. Fundamentals are still a key consideration for investors. When it comes to alternative data, it’s critical to ensure that organizations are getting data from the correct sources and in a timely fashion. A service provider partner can be instrumental in helping financial firms tackle and address data management issues they now realize they have.