Image depicting IT staff in financial services, highlighting cybersecurity and vetting issues - Global Banking & Finance Review
This image illustrates IT staff in financial services, emphasizing the need for stringent vetting processes to combat cybercrime as discussed by CISI. The article highlights the loophole in the DBS system that affects fraud checks.
Top Stories

GOVERNMENT MUST CLOSE MASSIVE LOOPHOLE ON VETTING FINANCIAL SERVICES IT STAFF IF IT IS SERIOUS ABOUT COMBATTING CYBERCRIME, SAYS CISI

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on October 23, 2014

3 min read
Add as preferred source on Google

Critical Loophole in IT Staff Vetting

A major loophole in the UK’s criminal records checking system means that  IT staff, including those working in critical functions within financial services firms are not permitted to be vetted for fraud, says Simon Culhane, Chartered FCSI and CEO of the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment (CISI).

In the latest edition of the 40,000 strong CISI’s member magazine, Securities & Investment Review, Mr Culhane explains: “The FCA requires that anyone seeking to be an “authorised person” needs to be checked against the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). However, there is no such requirement for any check for those working in IT. In fact it is worse: it is expressly prohibited to subject current or future IT staff to verification from the DBS as the vast majority do not hold a role that meets the strict criteria that allows them to be checked.

“It does lead to a strange anomaly. If you become a football steward, then you can be checked, but not if you work in critical IT roles in major banks and finance houses controlling millions of data points, and are responsible for the money transmission of billions of pounds.”

Focus on Safeguarding Over Financial Crime

The CISI says the core problem is the focus of the DBS is on safeguarding people, not financial crime, so attention is focused on convictions for sexual and harming offences, not for fraud. The Government also wants to rehabilitate offenders more quickly, so in May 2013 it announced that further “filtering” of disclosable offences would occur, which reduces what will be divulged when an employee is checked. Some of this was very sensible, such as removing notification of police cautions; however it does mean that the background checks are now less thorough.

Regulatory Proposals to Enhance Oversight

In July, the FCA and the PRA issued a consultation paper (CP 13/14) which announced changes to the current Approved Persons regime, proposing to bring a Senior Management Responsibility (SMR) function and a much wider “Certified” person’s requirement.  However, whilst there is a requirement for a Senior Manager to have responsibility for IT overall, and for that Manager to be checked, it doesn’t apply to the programmers, developers, controllers and helpdesk staff.

Government Must Close Massive Loophole On Vetting Financial Services It Staff If It Is Serious About Combatting Cybercrime, Says Cisi

Government Must Close Massive Loophole On Vetting Financial Services It Staff If It Is Serious About Combatting Cybercrime, Says Cisi

Current Offence List Omits Financial Crimes

The Government also published a list of offences which would never be filtered, which again demonstrates that beating financial crime is not a priority, as not one of the 1,028 listed offences related to financial crime or fraud (apart from not paying customs duty).

Cybercrime Impact and Sector Vulnerabilities

Alan Yarrow, Chartered FCSI (Hon), Chairman CISI said: ”Cybercrime costs the economy over a billion pounds a week, with seven people being defrauded each minute. The finance sector is particularly vulnerable to cyber-attacks as it possesses the personal data of almost every adult in the country.”

Mr Culhane said: “The Government needs to shut the back door and give employers the basic tools to carry out first level due diligence on those who hold power over a critical part of the cyber network.”

The CISI will be asking the Home Secretary to close the loophole.

Survey Reveals Concerns on Industry Protection

The CISI’s latest survey on cybercrime, which drew 908 respondents, asked “How well protected is the financial services industry against the threat of cybercrime?” Only one in five respondents felt there is a high level of protection  (with 3%  saying “very” and 17% saying “significantly”).

Key Takeaways

  • UK criminal record checks via the DBS do not extend to IT staff in financial services firms, even for critical roles.
  • The Disclosure and Barring Service focuses on safeguarding individuals, not financial crime, meaning fraud convictions are typically excluded.
  • Under current FCA and PRA proposals (SMR/Certified Persons), only senior managers are subject to vetting—not developers or helpdesk staff.
  • CISI highlights that cybercrime costs the UK economy over £1 billion weekly, emphasizing the risk posed by unvetted IT staff.
  • The CISI urges Government action to close this loophole and enable first-level due diligence on critical IT personnel.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can’t IT staff in financial services be DBS-checked?
Because UK DBS checks focus on safeguarding for vulnerable groups and fraud offences aren’t prioritised; most IT roles don’t meet DBS eligibility criteria.
Does the FCA’s SMR or Certification regime cover IT staff?
No—while senior managers have to be vetted, the regime doesn’t extend criminal record checks to programmers, controllers, helpdesk or other IT staff.
What anomaly does CISI highlight?
That roles like football stewards can be DBS-checked, while critical IT roles handling vast financial data cannot.
What’s the scale of cybercrime in the UK?
CISI cites cybercrime costs at over £1 billion per week, with seven fraud victims every minute.
What is CISI urging the Government to do?
To close the vetting loophole by enabling employers to conduct criminal background checks on IT staff in financial services.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category