Connect with us

Top Stories

GETTING YOUR PSD2 MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS ON POINT

Published

on

GETTING YOUR PSD2 MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS ON POINT

By Michael Scanlan, Fintech PR Consultant

If you have even the faintest interest in fintech, you’ll know that the 2nd EU Payment Services Directive is going to come into force in January next year.

New entrants and established players will be coming on stream with solutions to take advantage of the PSD2 presented opportunities. And even those not directly involved in PSD2 will still want to take part in the debate about how this directive will change payments and how stakeholders can make it work.

There will be a crowded market place of ideas and products and business will struggle to make their voices heard among the roar unless they have something unique, informed and interesting to say.

Everyone with a stake in PSD2 has an opinion on it. Making sure your opinion is heard over the coming months will be a challenge. But it can be done.

What is PSD2?

In a nutshell, PSD2 is the Second EU Payment Services Directive and is designed to build upon the foundations of the First EU Payment Services Directive.

PSD1 was launched by the European Commission in 2007. It created the Single European Payments Area (SEPA) which was designed to be the euro of electronic payments. In short, just as the EU had a single currency, so it would have a single payments system.

The payments industry has developed at an almost exponential rate. Ten years ago, mobiles were for calls, texts and the occasional game of snake. Today we can run our entire lives, including our financial lives, from them.

Fintech has gone from niche to an industry that everyone wants to be a part of. It’s a landscape that’s confusing, can be biased in favour of the big banks and hard for new entrants to break into.

PSD2 is an attempt to make sense of this and rebalance the playing field. It is a stepping stone on the ultimate path to the digital single market. By helping to drive towards as more integrated and efficient European payments market which promote both competition and regulation it will lay down the road map to the DSM.

It is designed to help new market entrants, such as fintechs, increase choice, lower prices for payments and protect consumers against fraud through strong consumer authentication for payments. It won’t just affect the EU, it applies to one-leg transactions too so non-EU companies carrying out payments with EU companies will still fall under its auspices.

Key talking points.

Those are the basics of PSD2 but there are a lot of nuances and a huge variety of talking points. Here are some of the major ones:

AISPs – Account Information Service Providers will be able to extract a customer’s account information data including transaction history and balances but only with the permission of the customer. Customers will be able to aggregate all of their financial accounts onto online platform in order to better monitor and plan their financial lives. Also, when applying for financial products, consumers sometimes have to provide bank statements and other financial records. With AISPs, this would not be necessary as, with permission, the financial service providers would be able to access this information directly from the applicant’s bank account.

Key talking points:

How this will work in practice?

What are the security implications? For example, what happens in case of data breaches? How can consumers and banks be sure that third parties will keep data secure?

Is there a public appetite for this?

Will banks dominate this or will there be space for new entrants?

PISPs – Payment Initiation Service Providers will be able to initiate online payments to an e-merchant or other beneficiary directly from the payer’s bank account via an online portal. It is payment via direct bank transfer such as Faster Payments or similar. It will open up payments far beyond the scope of the traditional card scheme and will see significant competition in this market.

Key talking points:

PISPs are a direct challenge to cards and without interchange fees, how will schemes make money

MasterCard are buying Vocalink? Will other schemes follow suit and open new revenue streams? And is this smart business by MasterCard or a panic buy?

Is there appetite for this? Consumers already have choice in payments. Will PISPs just confuse matters further or are there tangible consumer benefits?

Who will win out in the PISP battle; new entrants or established players?

SCA – Strong Customer Authentication is at the heart of PSD2. Improving security and making consumers more confident in online transactions. The EBA has issued its final draft RTS on SCA but these still have to be approved by the European Commission and European Parliament and won’t be implemented until November 2018, some 11 months after PSD2 is implemented.

Key talking points:

How can businesses be ready for SCA when there cannot be certainty about what the final version will look like?

Will the 11-month gap lead to more uncertainty and fraud?

What can business do to manage this risk?

What sort of SCA solutions should business be looking for? What has got staying power and what’s a fad?

Will we be ready? – There is a lot to do between now and January 2018. Are businesses making the progress they need to be ready? Is anyone ready? Does anyone care?

Key talking points:

How can consumers be educated about PSD2?

Is there a danger that larger players will use their marketing budgets to promote their services, drowning out new entrants?
Who should new entrants be talking to to stake their claim? Business, consumer or both?

The right communications approach

With so many talking points and so many potential pitfalls, as well as opportunities, how should you get the most out of your PSD2 communications approach?

Be confident in what you say – With so many talking heads on PSD2, lots of people will be saying lots of things. Be sure that what you add to the debate is based on evidence and experience.

Stick to your area of expertise – The expert opinion is the area that is listened to. Ensure that your expert opinion is heard and don’t be side-tracked into areas where you can’t add value

Don’t be afraid to be controversial – Controversy for its own sake is not recommended. But if you have a point of view that is different from the received wisdom and can be backed up with evidence, then voice that opinion.

Don’t step on toes – PSD2 will mean that new entrants will need to work with big players as well as competing with them. Being critical of legacy banks for the sake of column inches could hamper future deals.

Think beyond words – PSD2 is complex and even experts are struggling to understand its nuances. An infographic could be the perfect vehicle to explain your thinking in a concise and coherent fashion.

Call in the experts – Communications can be confusing and there are bear traps to be avoided at every step. The right communications consultants, who understand the industry and understand your business, are critical in helping you get your own approach right.

Conclusions

Maximising the PR opportunities of PSD2 is more than just shouting loudest. It is about contributing to, even leading, debates through the correct deployment of evidence based expertise. By choosing talking points wisely, expressing them succinctly and by partnering with the right communications specialists to deliver, your message can stand out from the crowd.

Top Stories

Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets

Published

on

Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets 1

By Tommy Wilkes

LONDON (Reuters) – The Australian dollar rose to near a three-year high and the British pound scaled $1.40 for the first time since 2018 on optimism about economic rebounds in the two countries and after the U.S. dollar was knocked by disappointing jobs data.

The U.S. currency had been rising in recent days as a jump in Treasury yields on the back of the so-called reflation trade drew investors. But an unexpected increase in U.S. weekly jobless claims soured the economic outlook and sent the dollar lower overnight.

On Friday it traded down 0.3% against a basket of currencies, with the dollar index at 90.309.

The Aussie rose 0.8% to $0.784, its highest since March 2018. The currency, which is closely linked to commodity prices and the outlook for global growth, has been helped by a recent rally in commodity prices.

The New Zealand dollar also gained, and was not far off a more than two-year high, while the Canadian dollar rose too.

Sterling rose to $1.4009 on Friday, an almost three-year high amid Britain’s aggressive vaccination programme.

Given the size of Britain’s vital services sector, analysts say the faster it can reopen the economy, the better for the currency. Sterling was also helped by better-than-expected purchasing managers index flash survey data for February.

The U.S. dollar has been weighed down by a string of soft labour data, even as other indicators have shown resilience, and as President Joe Biden’s pandemic relief efforts take shape, including a proposed $1.9 trillion spending package.

Despite the recent rise in U.S. yields, many analysts think they won’t climb too much higher, limiting the benefit for the dollar.

“Our view remains that the Fed will hold the line and remain very cautious about tapering asset purchases. We think it will keep communicating that tightening is very far off, which should dampen pro-dollar sentiment,” said UBS Global Wealth Management strategist Gaétan Peroux and analyst Tilmann Kolb.

ING analysts said “the rise in rates will be self-regulating, meaning the dollar need not correct too much higher”.

They see the greenback index trading down to the 90.10 to 91.05 range.

U.S. dollar

Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets 2

The euro rose 0.4% to $1.2134. The single currency showed little reaction to purchasing manager index data, which showed a slowdown in business activity in February. However, factories had their busiest month in three years, buoying sentiment.

The dollar bought 105.39 yen, down 0.3% and a continued retreat from the five-month high of 106.225 reached Wednesday.

(Editing by Hugh Lawson and Pravin Char)

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction?

Published

on

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 3

By Shreya Jain

If the recently finished 2020 has taught us anything, it is that we’d do well to re-evaluate the way things usually work. And in a world, that is still struggling to its feet after a tumultuous year, one can look around and notice that some pieces of reality have played musical chairs: social activities once regarded as keystones of public life are now greeted with deep suspicion, even fear; previously stable industries are on life support; and minimum wage employees suddenly bear the mantle of “essential workers” despite few immediate benefits of this increased responsibility.

Life, in other words, is not behaving as usual. And neither are the banks.

According to FDIC data, a record $2 trillion[1] has been deposited in U.S. banks since the coronavirus first struck the U.S. in January. More than 5.2 million[2] loans were issued by banks participating in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to keep several businesses afloat during the COVID-19 induced pandemic. This is the primary role of banks – to accept deposits and to grant loans.

In a direct juxtaposition to this primary role, if we look at the sources of revenue for banks to determine its role, especially during crisis, it however tells a story of banking institutions deviating from their primary role.

Consider the revenue distribution for a few top banks (Fig. 1):

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 4

Fig. 1: Composition of total revenue in 2019 H1 and 2020 H1

For all three of these banks, an increasing percentage of total revenues has been coming from the Investment Banking division, primarily driven by the Fixed Income Market.

In fact, in the most recent Dodd-Frank Stress Tests (DFAST), Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are ordered to hold the most capital of all the 34 firms tested- 13.6% and 13.2%[3] respectively. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have particularly high stress buffers because of the nature of the Fed’s exams, which put extra pressure on banks that rely heavily on capital markets; Goldman Sachs also has their decision to maintain dividends.

There is an intriguing question in all this – one made easier by recent developments.

“Should Banks be in a Growth Business?”

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 5There are a number of sources to draw from for a possible answer. We have a number of lessons from the past. The Glass-Steagall Act is a 1933 law that separated investment banking from retail banking. By separating the two, retail banks were prohibited from using depositors’ funds for risky investments. Only 10% of their income could come from selling securities. They could underwrite government bonds. [4]

However, the banking industry soon objected that the act was too restrictive. They believed they could not compete with foreign financial firms offering higher returns as the U.S. banks could only invest in low-risk securities. They wanted to increase returns while lowering overall risk for their customers by diversifying their business.

The most audacious move was when Citicorp and Travelers Group — a commercial bank and financial services company, respectively – merged to create Citigroup Inc. It was an unforeseen event that took the financial world aback for a number of reasons – not least of which was that such a move was technically illegal. But Glass-Steagall had a number of exploitable loopholes. This was just one possible outcome.

On November 12, 1999, President Clinton signed the Financial Services Modernization Act that repealed Glass-Steagall. This consolidated investment and retail banks through financial holding companies.[5] , creating new entities supervised by the Federal Reserve. For that reason, only a few banks took advantage of the Glass-Steagall repeal. Most Wall Street banks did not want the additional supervision and capital requirements.

Those that did take advantage became “too big to fail”.

The Bigger They Are…

The focus today on “Growth” above and beyond what would otherwise be allowed under Glass Stegall Act has been worrisome. The thirty-four participants in the severely adverse scenario of this year’s Dodd-Frank Stress Tests (DFAST) estimated their risk-based Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio would trough to 9.9%, from an end-2019 amount of 12%. In the worst-case scenario –assuming a W-shaped recession where the US is hammered by a second wave of the illness– banks’ aggregate CET1 ratios are projected to plummet to 7.7% after taking $680 billion of loan losses.

While it’s true that banks with trading focus have fared better recently due to an unusual rally in the stock market, there is still some cause for concern. Should that rally turn into a correction or a crash, the FED- and ultimately the American taxpayers – could have to actually bailout these too-big-to fail banks.

 A New York Fed paper, using data for more than 200 banks in 45 countries, found that banks classified by rating agencies as “more likely to receive government support” engage in more risk-taking. Moreover, the label of “too big to fail” and passing stress tests may create a false sense of security for large banks, thus encouraging them to continue taking risks with depositors’ money. Said differently, banks engaging in riskier behaviour are also more likely to take advantage of potential government support. Figure 2 shows that Banks with a higher probability of government support (as indicated by support rating floors – NF to AA-AA indicating increasing likelihood of government support) also have more trading assets on average.[6]

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 6

Fig 2: Summary Statistics of Bank’s Balance Sheet by Support Rating Floors

The support itself is not seen as bearing great future results either. The paper shows that following an increase in government support, we see a larger volume of bank lending becoming impaired and increase in net charge-offs. Additionally, we find that the effect of government support on impaired loans is stronger for riskier banks than safer ones, as measured by their issuer default ratings.

So, should a Bank be focusing on its growth? Should Banks be limited in what they do? Is the present Stress Test sufficient? Or does passing the stress test only contribute to an inflated confidence and outsized risk tolerance given the potential consequences?

…The Harder They Fall

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 7

A number of open questions that the banking industry still has to figure out….

Let us turn once again to lessons from the past, 2008 The Financial Crisis.

The financial crisis of 2008 had its foundation in bad mortgages, but this wasn’t what ultimately brought the banks to the brink of collapse.  Volcker noted when he proposed his idea (Volcker rule, a federal regulation that prohibits banks from conducting certain investment activities with their own accounts and limits their dealings with hedge funds and private equity funds, also called covered funds[7].) that the culprit wasn’t bad loans, but the exotic trades banks had made around them.

At the time, there was discussion of reinstating The Glass-Steagall Act but the banks argued that doing so would make them too small to compete on a global scale. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act was passed instead. This Act requires the Fed to conduct an annual stress test of bank holding companies with $50 billion in assets – otherwise known as “too big to fail.”[8]

Section 619 of the Act was The Volcker Rule aimed, once again, at separating the commercial and investment banking divisions of banks, but not with the same stringent restrictions as Glass-Steagall Act. It aimed to prohibit banks from using customer deposits for their own profit. Moreover, restricted banks from owning, investing in, or sponsoring hedge funds, private equity funds, or other trading operations for their own use. These steps were meant to protect depositors from the types of speculative investments that led to the 2008 financial crisis.

The idea became law in the Dodd-Frank reforms of 2010, but the rule-writing took another three years due to squabbles over how to separate prop trading from market-making and hedging. Instead of blanket bans, regulators sought to define each situation and carve out a string of exemptions, which is how the rule grew. The final rule also clarifies that certain activities are not prohibited, including acting as agent, broker, or custodian. As a result, the Volcker Rule has been in force since July 21, 2015

When the final version called on traders to certify the intent of each transaction, Jamie Dimon, the chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, complained that traders would need a psychologist and a lawyer by their side to make sure they were in compliance.[9] Fed researchers found that the rule resulted in less-liquid markets for some bonds in times of stress. But by and large, banks adapted to it, though that did not stop them from lobbying for years to win procedural changes. Under the Trump administration, regulators showed a strong interest in simplifying the rule. The revamp, known as Volcker 2.0, is a steady effort to soften Volcker regulations during Trump’s administration.

Volcker2.0 – “Volcker 2.0” went into effect on October 1, 2020.

The Proposed Rule adds four new exclusions to the definition of “covered fund” — credit funds, venture capital funds, family wealth management vehicles and customer facilitation vehicles — thereby exempting them from the scope of the Volcker Rule.[10]

Changes in proprietary trading include eliminating a requirement that banks reserve an initial margin over 15% of Tier 1 capital and may allow banks to invest in up to $40B more in credit-default swaps.[11]

More capital will be available to venture capitalists, therefore making additional capital available to start-up companies. However, many believe this may be a short-lived change following the 2020 presidential election.

Volcker 2.0 is representative of a pendulum swing in financial regulatory compliance away from the strong reaction to the financial crisis of 2008.

Banks evaluated their capital market businesses to identify opportunities to leverage newly permitted activities and the reduced operational burden of Volcker 2.0. Different banks have commenced new strategies by increasing trading volumes and holdings. As an example, the table below (Figure 4) illustrates a trend in the commercial bank sector, and how the trading assets volume increased in 2019 in anticipation of the Volcker amendments.

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 8

Fig.4 : Total Trading Assets for Commercial Banks in the US[12]

Is COVID-19 the new lesson? Is FED, via Stress Test trying to tighten regulatory burdens for Banks majorly associated with proprietary trading driven revenues such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley? As per FED Stress Test in 2020, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were the two banks that faced the highest jump in the required minimum CET1 ratio – 4.1% and 3.2% respectively. (Fig 5)[13]

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 9

Fig.5: Minimum CET1 ratio in 2019 and 2020

 On one hand, financial regulators eased the financial crisis-era Volcker Rule. Conversely, the same regulators brought about tighter requirements via Stress Test for banks that are focussed on Trading revenues.

The change in minimum CET1 ratio is inversely related to the PEG ratio (Q3 2020) right after when the minimum CET1 were to be met. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs had PEG ratios of 0.97 and 1.44, the lowest amongst their peers, while they had the largest change in minimum CET1 ratio – 4.1% and 3.4% respectively.(Fig 6.)

Will COVID Finally Give Big Banks Their Direction? 10

Fig.6: PEG Ratio post change in required minimum CET1 ratio

With another administrative change (new government) will the Volcker Rule be changed again to go closer to what it was intended for. Will banks be forced to choose between proprietary trading and having a PEG ratio comparable to its peers?

Do Banks Get a New Normal Too?

Oz Shy, a professor at MIT proposes that if we were to ensure policymakers let banks fail – we need to prepare in advance for the next wave of bank failures by protecting depositors’ money, instead of just focusing on stress tests or size reductions.

Depositors should be simply allowed to have access to accounts that maintain 100 percent reserves. That is, every cent of their savings would be backed by hard currency. His research has shown that moving in this direction improves social welfare relative to the current system of purely fractional banking, in which banks only hold a fraction of their deposits. A 100 percent reserves policy would break our current system’s bundling of risk-taking with the job of keeping accounts safe and offering payment services. Only then, by ensuring depositors (and voters) aren’t at risk when there’s a crisis, would governments have the will to let banks fail – without any regard to their size – and at no cost to taxpayers.[14]

And if a few banks want to be in growth business, they should be treated very differently than the other banks with a pure focus on transmission and custodian roles. More than what current stress test does. Maybe that’s the “new normal” banks need.

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/21/banks-have-grown-by-2-trillion-in-deposits-since-coronavirus-first-hit.html

[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-ppp-banks-focus-idUSKBN2761G4

[3] https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20200904a.htm

[4] https://www.thebalance.com/glass-steagall-act-definition-purpose-and-repeal-3305850#:~:text=The%20Glass%2DSteagall%20Act%20is,investment%20banking%20from%20retail%20banking.&text=By%20separating%20the%20two%2C%20retail,They%20could%20underwrite%20government%20bonds.

[5]https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gramm_leach_bliley_act#:~:text=This%20legislation%2C%20signed%20into%20law,was%20granted%20new%20supervisory%20powers.

[6] https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/2014/1412afon.pdf

[7] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/volcker-rule.asp

[8] https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ203/PLAW-111publ203.pdf

[9] https://www.bloombergquint.com/quicktakes/the-volcker-rule

[10] https://www.srz.com/resources/summary-of-proposed-volcker-2-0-for-fund-activities.html

[11] https://gillespiegroup.law/2020/06/introducing-volcker-2-0-changed-need-know/

[12] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USTTAST

[13] https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20200810a.htm

[14] https://theconversation.com/feds-focus-on-too-big-to-fail-wont-save-taxpayers-from-next-bank-bailout-61884

Continue Reading

Top Stories

ECB faces tricky balancing act after pandemic debt surge

Published

on

ECB faces tricky balancing act after pandemic debt surge 11

By Francesco Canepa, Frank Siebelt and Balazs Koranyi

FRANKFURT (Reuters) – As the euro zone begins to emerge from the depths of a pandemic-induced recession, the European Central Bank is facing a difficult balancing act between supporting indebted governments and keeping creditors onside.

Encouraged by the ECB’s massive bond purchase programme and ultra-low interest rates, national governments have taken on a mountain of new borrowing to cushion the coronavirus pandemic, pushing total public debt to 102% of the region’s output.

With a euro zone recovery seen lagging that of the United States or Asia, these countries will not grow their way out of debt or see it eroded away by rising prices any time soon.

Yet Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann has made clear he expects monetary policy to return to normal once inflation returns.

That means President Christine Lagarde and her colleagues must strike a difficult balance between the need to keep credit sufficiently easy for weaker borrowers like Italy while not losing the support of creditor countries.

“I think the ECB is trapped,” said Friedrich Heinemann, a professor at Germany’s ZEW institute.

“Certain heavily indebted countries can no longer cope on their own. The big issue here is the Italian debt,” he said of Rome’s 154% debt/GDP level.

ECB chief economist Philip Lane has rejected the idea that the bank’s policy is constrained, saying in a Reuters interview last year he was confident the bank could exit its bond-buying programmes when inflation allowed it to do so.

This is unlikely to happen any time soon.

JAPANESE WAY

The ECB has been already buying government bonds for six years, trying but largely failing to generate enough activity to achieve its near-two-percent inflation target.

Notwithstanding an expected rebound in euro area prices this year due to one-off factors and speculation of reflation in the United States, there is no sign of a stable return to higher levels of inflation on this side of the Atlantic.

This is due to both the aftermath of the pandemic, which destroyed millions of jobs, and structural factors keeping a lid on prices such as an ageing population, relentless technological progress and globally competitive product markets.

Even if inflation were to reach 2%, Lagarde could argue that it should be allowed to overshoot for some time after lagging below target for over a decade.

This argument, borrowed by the Federal Reserve, is being discussed as part of an ongoing review of the ECB’s policy strategy.

That should give Lagarde a justification to keep rates low and perhaps even continue buying bonds for a long time, like the Bank of Japan has been doing.

“It’s the Japanese way of handling the problem,” Philipp Vorndran, a strategist at fund management firm Flossbach von Storch, said. “A state can work at zero interest for eternity if people don’t lose trust in money.”

Graphic: Italy’s debt to GDP ratio

ECB faces tricky balancing act after pandemic debt surge 12

BUYING BONDS

The ECB has bought 3 trillion euros worth of government debt and it has pledged to keep at it until the coronavirus crisis is over and replace maturing bonds for even longer.

For now, Lagarde is free of some of the problems that dogged her predecessor, notably a lengthy court dispute with German sceptics about the legality of bond purchases that has been put to bed following a constitutional ruling last May.

The European Union is finally progressing on fiscal matters, issuing for the first time substantial amounts of joint debt to finance a 750-billion-euro pandemic recovery fund – giving the ECB more scope for bond purchases and alleviating pressure on some of the weaker members of the bloc.

Former Italian Economy Minister Roberto Gualtieri had already committed to bringing Italy’s debt ratio back down to 2019 levels by 2030 through growth and investment, while the appointment of ex-ECB boss Mario Draghi as prime minister is fuelling investor hopes for growth-friendly reforms.

It is too early to tell whether the euro zone’s rising debt mountain will become a theme for conservatives in Germany’s federal election this September – but for now, coalition sources say they are steering clear of any debate around ECB policy.

But she still has some convincing to do.

Beyond Weidmann and fellow hawks on the ECB’s Governing Council, low rates have infuriated savers, who have seen the returns on fixed income investments disappear and property prices skyrocket in some areas.

Ironically, inflated assets prices make it even more difficult for the ECB to tighten policy if needed as that would likely trigger an economically disruptive market rout.

This and the unspoken need to help governments roll over their debt, known in academic parlance as “fiscal dominance”, meant the ECB was seen as having little choice but to keep the money taps open for the foreseeable future.

“What constrains the ability of the ECB to intervene against inflation is not just fiscal dominance but also the dependence of financial markets on low yields,” said Luis Garicano, a Spanish member of the European Parliament and a professor of economics at IE Business School.

(Additional reporting by Giselda Vagnoni in Rome; Editing by Mark John and Toby Chopra)

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate

Latest Articles

Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets 13 Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets 14
Top Stories11 mins ago

Aussie and sterling hit multi-year highs on recovery bets

By Tommy Wilkes LONDON (Reuters) – The Australian dollar rose to near a three-year high and the British pound scaled...

Extrusion Equipment Market In-Depth Analysis on Size, Cost Structure and Prominent Key Players -Milacron, RDN Manufacturing Co., Inc., Coperion GmbH, Conair Group, Toshiba Machine Co., Ltd., HPM, Krauss Maffei. 16 Extrusion Equipment Market In-Depth Analysis on Size, Cost Structure and Prominent Key Players -Milacron, RDN Manufacturing Co., Inc., Coperion GmbH, Conair Group, Toshiba Machine Co., Ltd., HPM, Krauss Maffei. 17
Research Reports35 mins ago

Extrusion Equipment Market In-Depth Analysis on Size, Cost Structure and Prominent Key Players -Milacron, RDN Manufacturing Co., Inc., Coperion GmbH, Conair Group, Toshiba Machine Co., Ltd., HPM, Krauss Maffei.

Impact of COVID-19 on Industrial Automation Market COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe impact on the global economy at various...

UV Cured Coatings Market – Latest Research, Industry Analysis, Driver, Trends, Business Overview, Key Value, Demand And Forecast 2016-2026. 18 UV Cured Coatings Market – Latest Research, Industry Analysis, Driver, Trends, Business Overview, Key Value, Demand And Forecast 2016-2026. 19
Research Reports37 mins ago

UV Cured Coatings Market – Latest Research, Industry Analysis, Driver, Trends, Business Overview, Key Value, Demand And Forecast 2016-2026.

Impact of COVID-19 on Chemicals & Materials Industry COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe impact on the global economy at various...

Rotomoulding Powder Market Current Scenario Trends, Comprehensive Analysis and Regional Forecast to 2027 20 Rotomoulding Powder Market Current Scenario Trends, Comprehensive Analysis and Regional Forecast to 2027 21
Research Reports38 mins ago

Rotomoulding Powder Market Current Scenario Trends, Comprehensive Analysis and Regional Forecast to 2027

Impact of COVID-19 on Chemicals & Materials Industry COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe impact on the global economy at various...

Food And Beverage Chemicals Market Business Growth, Size and Comprehensive Research Study Forecast to 2027| GIVAUDAN,ARCHES DANIELS MIDLAND (ADM),BASF SE,DANISCO,Avantor Performance Materials, LLC,Ecolab Food & Beverage. 22 Food And Beverage Chemicals Market Business Growth, Size and Comprehensive Research Study Forecast to 2027| GIVAUDAN,ARCHES DANIELS MIDLAND (ADM),BASF SE,DANISCO,Avantor Performance Materials, LLC,Ecolab Food & Beverage. 23
Research Reports39 mins ago

Food And Beverage Chemicals Market Business Growth, Size and Comprehensive Research Study Forecast to 2027| GIVAUDAN,ARCHES DANIELS MIDLAND (ADM),BASF SE,DANISCO,Avantor Performance Materials, LLC,Ecolab Food & Beverage.

Impact of COVID-19 on Chemicals & Materials Industry COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe impact on the global economy at various...

Cell Culture Media Bags Market Will Reach US$ 2.6 billion by 2030 – Future Market Insights 24 Cell Culture Media Bags Market Will Reach US$ 2.6 billion by 2030 – Future Market Insights 25
Research Reports40 mins ago

Cell Culture Media Bags Market Will Reach US$ 2.6 billion by 2030 – Future Market Insights

The cell culture media bags market is expected to expand at CAGR of 10.7% through the forecast period (2020-2030). Demand for cell...

PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Market Witnessing Growing Adoption on Back of Proven Efficiency – Future Market Insights 26 PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Market Witnessing Growing Adoption on Back of Proven Efficiency – Future Market Insights 27
Research Reports41 mins ago

PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Market Witnessing Growing Adoption on Back of Proven Efficiency – Future Market Insights

The pd1 pdl1 inhibitors market is showing considerable amount of growth in the healthcare sector due to inclination towards safe and toxin...

Traction Motors Market by Technology, Application & Geography – Analysis & Forecast to 2025  Says FMI Analyst 28 Traction Motors Market by Technology, Application & Geography – Analysis & Forecast to 2025  Says FMI Analyst 29
Research Reports42 mins ago

Traction Motors Market by Technology, Application & Geography – Analysis & Forecast to 2025  Says FMI Analyst

During the prediction era, Future Market Insights adopted a multidisciplinary approach to shed light on the success and progress of...

Atopic Dermatitis Treatment Market Will Register a CAGR value of 12% through 2029 – Future Market Insights 30 Atopic Dermatitis Treatment Market Will Register a CAGR value of 12% through 2029 – Future Market Insights 31
Research Reports44 mins ago

Atopic Dermatitis Treatment Market Will Register a CAGR value of 12% through 2029 – Future Market Insights

The atopic dermatitis treatment market is expected to expand at CAGR of 12% in terms of value through the forecast period (2019-2029)....

2 – Ethyl Anthraquinone Market Size 2021Industry Share, Trends, Growth, COVID-19 Impact Analysis, Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2025 32 2 – Ethyl Anthraquinone Market Size 2021Industry Share, Trends, Growth, COVID-19 Impact Analysis, Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2025 33
Research Reports44 mins ago

2 – Ethyl Anthraquinone Market Size 2021Industry Share, Trends, Growth, COVID-19 Impact Analysis, Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2025

Future Market Insights has adopted multi-disciplinary approach to shed light on the advancement of the 2 – Ethyl Anthraquinone Market...

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now