Finance

German publishers reject Apple's revised app tracking rules, urge antitrust fine

Published by Global Banking & Finance Review

Posted on March 10, 2026

3 min read

· Last updated: April 1, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google
German publishers reject Apple's revised app tracking rules, urge antitrust fine
Global Banking & Finance Awards 2026 — Call for Entries

By Foo Yun Chee BRUSSELS, March 10 (Reuters) - Apple's proposed changes to its app tracking rules do not resolve antitrust issues in the mobile advertising market, associations representing German

German publishers reject Apple's revised app tracking rules, urge antitrust fine

German Publishers and Advertisers Criticize Apple's App Tracking Transparency Changes

By Foo Yun Chee

BRUSSELS, March 10 (Reuters) - German publishers and advertisers on Tuesday called for the country's competition authority to fine Apple over proposed changes to its app tracking rules, saying they do not do enough to resolve antitrust issues.

Background: Feedback Sought on Apple's App Tracking Transparency Tool

The authority had sought feedback from the groups, which include media agencies and the German Association of the Branded Goods Industry, on the changes to its App Tracking Transparency tool. 

Antitrust Charges Against Apple

The competition enforcer charged Apple in February last year with abusing its market power after Facebook-owner Meta Platforms along with publishers, advertisers and app developers, whose business models rely on advertising tracking, criticised the tool.

Apple's Response to Industry Criticism

Apple, which said it introduced the tool to allow users to control whether to grant apps permission to track their activity across other companies' apps and websites, pushed back against the industry groups' call for a fine.

"The tracking industry has consistently fought our efforts to keep users in control of their data, and this is just their latest attempt to gain unfettered access to personal information," Apple said.

"We will continue to defend this important privacy tool for our users."

It said German data protection authorities confirmed the tool was consistent with privacy laws and that an overwhelming majority of iOS users backed it, according to a study commissioned by the company.

Industry Response to Apple's Proposed Changes

Apple Remains 'Data Gatekeeper' Despite Changes, Groups Say

APPLE REMAINS 'DATA GATEKEEPER' DESPITE CHANGES, GROUPS SAY

Apple's Proposed Solutions

To address the German concerns, Apple proposed last December to introduce neutral consent prompts for both its services and third-party apps and to align the wording, content and visual design of those messages.

It also offered to simplify the consent process so developers can obtain user permission for advertising-related data processing in a way that complies with data protection law.

Publishers and Advertisers Reject Apple's Commitments

The associations, however, said on Tuesday that the proposed changes do not fix the issues outlined by the German watchdog.

"The proposed commitments would not change the negative effects of the App Tracking Transparency Framework," Bernd Nauen, chief executive of the German Advertising Federation, said in a joint letter signed by the trade bodies.

"Apple would remain the data gatekeeper and would continue to decide who gets access to advertising-relevant data and how companies can communicate with their end customers," he said.

The associations urged the watchdog to reject Apple's proposals, order the company to stop the app tracking tool and impose a fine.

Potential Consequences for Apple

Companies found guilty of breaching Germany's antitrust rules risk fines of as much as 10% of their annual global turnover.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Lincoln Feast and Joe Bavier)

Key Takeaways

  • German media and advertising associations argue Apple would still act as a ‘data gatekeeper’, controlling access to ad-relevant data even under its proposed ATT changes.
  • Germany’s Federal Cartel Office previously designated Apple as a ‘gatekeeper’ under stricter abuse-control rules and formally charged the company in February 2025, citing self-preferencing concerns.
  • Apple has already faced sanctions elsewhere in Europe — including a €150m fine in France and a €98.6m fine in Italy — for App Tracking Transparency issues, underscoring broader regulatory pushback.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes did Apple propose to its app tracking rules?
Apple proposed neutral consent prompts and a simplified consent process for both its services and third-party apps to address antitrust concerns in Germany.
Why are German publishers unhappy with Apple's revised rules?
German publishers and advertisers believe the proposed changes do not resolve the antitrust issues and continue to give Apple control over advertising-relevant data.
What action are German publishers urging the antitrust authority to take?
They are asking the German watchdog to reject Apple's proposals, halt its app tracking tool, and impose a fine on Apple.
What is the potential penalty for breaching Germany's antitrust rules?
Companies found guilty of breaching Germany's antitrust rules risk fines up to 10% of their annual turnover.
Who criticized Apple's App Tracking Transparency tool?
The tool faced criticism from Meta Platforms, publishers, advertisers, and app developers who rely on advertising tracking.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Finance

Explore more articles in the Finance category