Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


  • The total sum of fines issued to businesses and individuals by the UK’s key regulatory bodies has increased by 271% over the past two years
  • The total amount of prison time sentenced has increased by 124% over the same period
  • £2.45bn worth of fines were issued in the past two years
  • Company directors face average prison sentences of four years or more

LONDON, Monday 30 November 2015: UK regulators have been issuing tougher punishments to companies found guilty of wrongdoing, EY’s Investigations Index has revealed today. The study, which analysed fines and criminal prosecutions against business and individuals, showed that the average fine issued has increased from £10.8m to £42.3m over the last two years, equating to a 291% increase.

The total amount of fines has similarly increased by 271% over the same period, totalling £2.45b of penalties since 2013.

The Index examined a total of 231 cases from 1 October 2013 – 30 September 2015, and was based on data from regulatory bodies including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Competitions and Markets Authority (CMA) and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). 

Regulators are getting tougher on financial crime

John Smart, Head of EY’s UK Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services team, commented: “UK regulators are getting tougher on financial crime. In the wake of recent corporate scandals and growing political pressure, there seems to be a greater focus by the regulators to pursue cases that may once have been considered ‘too difficult’, to ensure those responsible for wrongdoing are held to account.

“The Index findings should also serve as a warning to companies, to review their processes on a regular basis. The top reasons for fines identified in our research, namely systems failings, business misconduct and misleading information, were all factors that could have been potentially avoided by having stronger control processes to identify and resolve any corporate blind spots.”

More prison sentences, but shorter spells behind bars

The study also found that the average prison sentence – issued following an investigation by one of the four regulatory bodies – has decreased by 40%, from 87 months to 52 months over the past two years. However, this is still three times longer than the one year and four month average sentence issued in the UK as a whole in 2014.

According to EY’s analysis, the UK’s regulatory bodies are handing out more prison sentences, with the amount of all prison time increasing by 124% in the last two years.

Sanjay Bhandari, Partner in EY’s UK Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services team added: “Historically, the management of owner-operated companies have tended to be more likely to be the subject of individual prosecutions for white collar crime as they may be less complex cases.

“However, increasingly, regulators and law enforcement agencies seem to be demonstrating a greater willingness to take on individuals in more complex organisations.”

Additional findings from the research include:

  • 58% of cases investigated by the SFO resulted in prison sentences
  • 56% of the cases the FCA investigated resulted in fines
  • Of the 82 cases investigated by the FCA over the course of two years, 25 were against individuals
  • Of those 25 cases, 36% resulted in prison sentences
  • 10% of all cases dealt with individuals or firms committing fraud
  • Of the 125 cases investigated by the CMA and OFT in the past two years, 119 were due to a proposed or completed merger or acquisition