Exclusive-How UBS Helped Epstein Accomplice Maxwell Buy Her Hideout, 'Tucked Away'
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on March 27, 2026
6 min readLast updated: March 27, 2026
Add as preferred source on GooglePublished by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on March 27, 2026
6 min readLast updated: March 27, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleNewly released DOJ files show UBS continued to manage Ghislaine Maxwell’s accounts and facilitated transfers—even after receiving a grand jury subpoena—ultimately enabling her $1.1 million purchase of the “Tucked Away” New Hampshire hideout in Dec 2019.
By Tom Sims, Naomi Rovnick, John O'Donnell and Lawrence White
FRANKFURT/LONDON, March 27 - In rural New Hampshire, a compound on a 156‑acre estate dubbed “Tucked Away” became Ghislaine Maxwell’s final residence before she was charged and arrested in July 2020.
Behind the cash purchase of the $1.1 million home in December 2019 were funds sent by Swiss banking giant UBS on Maxwell’s behalf a month earlier, documents in a cache of files released by the Department of Justice related to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein show. The money then cascaded through a web of trusts and banks to buy the secluded property as she sought to go into hiding.
UBS processed the transfer for an account linked to Maxwell three months after U.S. criminal investigators issued the bank a grand jury subpoena to divulge information on all her financial dealings on August 16 that year, citing an investigation into sex trafficking of children. UBS told Maxwell by email on August 1 that it would cease doing business with her within a month, without giving a reason.
Banks are required to show they take measures to prevent their services being used to facilitate crime. Failures can lead to large penalties by regulators, legal action from victims and costly reputational damage. Lenders must closely monitor high-risk customers and curb or cut their services if they suspect dubious activities.
Together with other transactions and investigators' reports, the documents underscore the central role UBS played in managing the finances of Epstein’s chief accomplice, whose proximity to the convicted felon had been reported years before the wealth manager had taken her on as a client.
The files shed rare light on how banks deal with rich customers and can ignore some of the red flags that might disqualify a regular client, said Tom Kirchmaier, a financial crime expert with the London School of Economics.
"Banks that are told of a secret criminal inquiry, as UBS was, typically do everything they can to find publicly available information to justify holding up the suspect’s money," he said.
In the Southern District of New York subpoena, the U.S. attorney told UBS the information was part of a criminal "felony" investigation, requesting it to keep the request secret in case a disclosure would "impede" the probe, the files show.
Epstein had died in jail days earlier, on August 10, as he faced sex trafficking charges.
UBS declined to comment on Maxwell or respond to Reuters' questions about why the bank processed the payment, saying that it does not speak about client-related matters.
Maxwell was convicted in 2021 and is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting and grooming teenage girls for sex, as well as for participating in the abuse of minor victims in some instances. Her lawyers had argued at that trial she was scapegoated for Epstein's crimes. A spokesperson for the prison where she is staying said Maxwell would not comment.
David Oscar Markus, the criminal defense attorney who last month represented Maxwell in a deposition to the House Oversight Committee, declined to comment.
“The pattern we’ve seen from our investigations of Epstein and a lot of other high-net-worth criminals is that the banks look the other way because they know ultra-wealthy clients can pack up and take their money across the street any time they want," said Senator Ron Wyden, who has scrutinized the money flows from Epstein's crimes.
“Ghislaine Maxwell wasn’t just some minor accessory to Epstein’s crimes, she was an essential part of his trafficking operation that reached all around the globe, and she’s accused of participating in abuse herself," Wyden said.
While information on Epstein's financial dealings remains incomplete, the files show he maintained access to major Wall Street firms well after his 2008 conviction: Deutsche Bank continued servicing Epstein's accounts into 2019 even after moving to cut ties, while Morgan Stanley opened accounts for Epstein-linked trusts as late as March of that year, Reuters has reported.
JOURNALIST JANET
Maxwell was arrested by FBI agents forcing entry into the compound at the end of a half-mile dirt driveway with "No Trespassing" signs, on the outskirts of Bradford, a small town known for its colonial white homes and horse farms.
Maxwell used the name Janet Marshall and posed as a journalist "who wants privacy" to buy the house when she met with the realtor, according to court documents from a bail hearing.
During her arrest, FBI agents discovered a mobile phone covered in aluminum foil to avoid being traced and a security team staffed by former British military members that had been hired to guard Maxwell during her stay there, the court documents show.
A document by federal U.S. investigators probing Maxwell's money links UBS to the New Hampshire hideout. The file, dated April 12, 2022, includes a flow chart detailing the wire transfers entitled “338 Washington Rd Bradford NH," a reference to the address of her home, Tucked Away.
The document states that the information is based on U.S. Treasury financial‑crime records and is marked “sensitive".
It shows UBS transferred nearly $8 million on November 12, 2019, from an account held for Montpelier Trust, an entity set up by Maxwell as its so-called grantor. Her then-husband Scott Borgerson was one of the trustees, UBS records show. The cash went to a TD Ameritrade account, of which Borgerson was the custodian.
Days before the transfer, on November 6, 2019, UBS was still in discussions with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on documents it would send as requested by the grand jury subpoena of August. Reuters could not establish if UBS alerted the authorities to the $8 million transfer.
Banks operating in the U.S. are obliged to in
UBS processed a $1.1 million fund transfer on behalf of Maxwell, which was used to buy her rural New Hampshire property 'Tucked Away' in December 2019.
Yes. UBS received a grand jury subpoena in August 2019 to provide information about Maxwell's financial activities due to an investigation into sex trafficking of children.
Banks risk legal penalties and reputational damage if they fail to monitor high-risk clients or act on red flags linked to criminal investigations.
Yes. Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley continued servicing Epstein-linked accounts even after his 2008 conviction and up to 2019.
Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for recruiting and grooming teenage girls for sex and participating in the abuse of minors.
Explore more articles in the Finance category