Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >EUROPEAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN CONSUMERS DEEPLY CONFLICTED OVER PRIVACY AND SECURITY PRIORITIES
    Business

    European and Middle Eastern Consumers Deeply Conflicted Over Privacy and Security Priorities

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on May 20, 2016

    9 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    An infographic illustrating the conflicting priorities of European and Middle Eastern consumers regarding data privacy and security, highlighting key statistics from a recent study.
    Graphic representation of consumer concerns over data privacy and security - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Study reveals differing attitudes across EMEA towards personal data use and protection from cyber terrorism

    Report highlights:

    • 72 per cent of consumers have no confidence in social media brands and marketing companies’ protection of their data, yet more consumers are sharing data on social media than ever before
    • 88 per cent of consumers feel strongly that organisations should improve authentication for greater security
    • Almost a third (31 per cent) see no value in giving their personal data to companies, and yet over half (53 per cent) are willing to share their date of birth, marital status (51 per cent) and personal interests (50 per cent) in return for using a company’s services for free
    • 43 per cent of consumers agree that private organisations should give government agencies access to locked devices – with major differences in countries across Europe and the Middle East
    • Over a fifth of consumers (21 per cent) think individuals should be responsible for protecting themselves against cyber terrorist threats

    An EMEA-wide study commissioned by F5 Networks has revealed that whilst European and Middle Eastern consumers have confidence in some organisations to keep their data safe, many are willing to share their personal information in return for using a service for free. The study, conducted by Opinium Research, surveyed over 7,000 consumers across the UK, Germany, France, Bene, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Poland, exploring their attitudes towards data security and handling.

    Fear of the known

    Sharing data with private companies left nearly three quarters (70 per cent) of consumers concerned that their data would get into the wrong hands, followed closely by their privacy being compromised (64 per cent). Social media brands and marketing companies fared the worst: 75 per cent of consumers stated they do not trust either with their personal data at all, and only 21 per cent were confident that they could protect consumer data effectively from hackers.

    But for some, these fears were overlooked if it meant they could use a company’s services for free. Over half were willing to share their date of birth (53 per cent), marital status (51 per cent) and personal interests (50 per cent); in Poland, 58 per cent would share their shopping habits, and half of consumers in Saudi Arabia, their mobile number. Yet almost a fifth (18 per cent) stated they would not give up their data at all, rising to 33 per cent in the UK. In fact, UK consumers were consistently the least willing to give up their data across EMEA.

    With trust comes expectation

    While consumers regarded banks as the most trustworthy companies (76 per cent) and had more confidence in them to protect their data (73 per cent) compared with other sectors, there remains a dissatisfaction in the methods used to protect their data. Consumers believed that banks (77 per cent), followed by healthcare (71 per cent), and public sector and government (74 per cent), needed to field better authentication capabilities to achieve greater security.

    88% of consumers feel strongly that organisations should improve authentication for greater security.

    “There are clear differences in the type of companies that consumers trust with their data,” Mike Convertino, CISO and VP, Information Security at F5 Networks commented. “Companies with a traditional focus on security, such as banks, are by far considered the most trustworthy but interestingly, we share the most information with social media channels despite the fact that we trust these companies the least to keep our data safe. Regardless of the industry, any consumer facing organisation needs to ensure that its protection is in line with its customers increasing demands. As we all become more aware of the risks, it becomes even more important to get a security and data protection infrastructure – technology, education and processes – in place that is stringent enough to protect against threats, but does not harm the customer experience.”

    The Debate: Privacy or Protection?

    The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), recently approved by the European Parliament, gives citizens the right to complain and obtain redress if their data is misused within the EU. When asked what they viewed as misusing their data, over two thirds (67 per cent) believed it was sharing their data with third parties without consent. Across EMEA, Poland (71 per cent) and UK (75 per cent) consumers felt strongest about sharing their data without consent as misuse.

    In the wake of the Apple and FBI debate over smartphone unlocking, 43 per cent of consumers agree with the statement that technology organisations should prioritise national security over consumer privacy and give government agencies access to locked devices. The figures were even higher in the UK (50 per cent) and Bene (49 per cent), but lower in Germany (38 per cent) and Saudi Arabia (37 per cent).

    The responsibility for protecting consumers against cyber terrorist threats is also up for debate. Over one fifth (21 per cent) of consumers believe that we should be responsible for protecting ourselves whilst twice as many (43 per cent) felt that it was the job of the government of their country to protect its citizens. The initial response begs the question as to whether more consumers are recognising that they play a pivotal role in the protection against external threats, but there’s still some way to go in sharing the responsibility.

    Study reveals differing attitudes across EMEA towards personal data use and protection from cyber terrorism

    Report highlights:

    • 72 per cent of consumers have no confidence in social media brands and marketing companies’ protection of their data, yet more consumers are sharing data on social media than ever before
    • 88 per cent of consumers feel strongly that organisations should improve authentication for greater security
    • Almost a third (31 per cent) see no value in giving their personal data to companies, and yet over half (53 per cent) are willing to share their date of birth, marital status (51 per cent) and personal interests (50 per cent) in return for using a company’s services for free
    • 43 per cent of consumers agree that private organisations should give government agencies access to locked devices – with major differences in countries across Europe and the Middle East
    • Over a fifth of consumers (21 per cent) think individuals should be responsible for protecting themselves against cyber terrorist threats

    An EMEA-wide study commissioned by F5 Networks has revealed that whilst European and Middle Eastern consumers have confidence in some organisations to keep their data safe, many are willing to share their personal information in return for using a service for free. The study, conducted by Opinium Research, surveyed over 7,000 consumers across the UK, Germany, France, Bene, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Poland, exploring their attitudes towards data security and handling.

    Fear of the known

    Sharing data with private companies left nearly three quarters (70 per cent) of consumers concerned that their data would get into the wrong hands, followed closely by their privacy being compromised (64 per cent). Social media brands and marketing companies fared the worst: 75 per cent of consumers stated they do not trust either with their personal data at all, and only 21 per cent were confident that they could protect consumer data effectively from hackers.

    But for some, these fears were overlooked if it meant they could use a company’s services for free. Over half were willing to share their date of birth (53 per cent), marital status (51 per cent) and personal interests (50 per cent); in Poland, 58 per cent would share their shopping habits, and half of consumers in Saudi Arabia, their mobile number. Yet almost a fifth (18 per cent) stated they would not give up their data at all, rising to 33 per cent in the UK. In fact, UK consumers were consistently the least willing to give up their data across EMEA.

    With trust comes expectation

    While consumers regarded banks as the most trustworthy companies (76 per cent) and had more confidence in them to protect their data (73 per cent) compared with other sectors, there remains a dissatisfaction in the methods used to protect their data. Consumers believed that banks (77 per cent), followed by healthcare (71 per cent), and public sector and government (74 per cent), needed to field better authentication capabilities to achieve greater security.

    88% of consumers feel strongly that organisations should improve authentication for greater security.

    “There are clear differences in the type of companies that consumers trust with their data,” Mike Convertino, CISO and VP, Information Security at F5 Networks commented. “Companies with a traditional focus on security, such as banks, are by far considered the most trustworthy but interestingly, we share the most information with social media channels despite the fact that we trust these companies the least to keep our data safe. Regardless of the industry, any consumer facing organisation needs to ensure that its protection is in line with its customers increasing demands. As we all become more aware of the risks, it becomes even more important to get a security and data protection infrastructure – technology, education and processes – in place that is stringent enough to protect against threats, but does not harm the customer experience.”

    The Debate: Privacy or Protection?

    The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), recently approved by the European Parliament, gives citizens the right to complain and obtain redress if their data is misused within the EU. When asked what they viewed as misusing their data, over two thirds (67 per cent) believed it was sharing their data with third parties without consent. Across EMEA, Poland (71 per cent) and UK (75 per cent) consumers felt strongest about sharing their data without consent as misuse.

    In the wake of the Apple and FBI debate over smartphone unlocking, 43 per cent of consumers agree with the statement that technology organisations should prioritise national security over consumer privacy and give government agencies access to locked devices. The figures were even higher in the UK (50 per cent) and Bene (49 per cent), but lower in Germany (38 per cent) and Saudi Arabia (37 per cent).

    The responsibility for protecting consumers against cyber terrorist threats is also up for debate. Over one fifth (21 per cent) of consumers believe that we should be responsible for protecting ourselves whilst twice as many (43 per cent) felt that it was the job of the government of their country to protect its citizens. The initial response begs the question as to whether more consumers are recognising that they play a pivotal role in the protection against external threats, but there’s still some way to go in sharing the responsibility.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostUnderstanding the New Overtime Regulations
    Next Business PostGeneral Data Protection Regulation: The Compliance Countdown Has Begun