Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


Banking and finance executives Face Barriers to Building an Agile Business Including Disconnect Between Project Managers and Executives, Lack of Transparency, Poor Communication, and Reliance on Spreadsheets

Radical disruption is the new business-as-usual. One day you’re hailing a taxi; the next day Uber or Lyft pulls up to your front door. And while enterprises value and aspire to the innovator’s mindset, they’re not confident in their business’ ability to pivot in the face of disruption.

A new study, “Business Agility: Is it Easy to Pivot?”,reveals the disconnect between aspiration and reality and identifies potential pitfalls to navigating a shifting business landscape. For the survey, Changepoint(http://www.changepoint.com)explored the agility of global businesses and asked respondents to evaluate the challenges and barriers PMOs face in building nimbler organizations, and this release reveals the responses from those working within financial services.

Organizational agility is critical for any enterprise, yet financial services organisations around the globe and across industries do not have systems in place to adapt. While C-level executives are concerned with disruptive new entrants, only 10 percent of financial services survey respondents are confident they can pivot their business if needed. This ongoing struggle is made more challenging by a disconnect between project managers and executives. More than half of respondents working in financial services (56 percent) acknowledge being unsure of their corporate objectives and values. Similarly, half of respondents cited poor communication between and within departments as the most difficult aspect of managing teams.

“The hard truth is, at any moment, your business is most likely disrupting or being disrupted,” said Alan Shefveland, Director, Product Management, Strategy and Innovation at Changepoint. “The best way to thrive in the face of rapid change is rewriting your playbook to refocus on accelerating internal operations.”

Nimble organizations actively engage executive sponsors, align projects to strategy, and establish an effective PMO. Communication, collaboration, and engagement are key to enabling change and managing risk effectively and continue to be big hurdles for PMOs. Survey respondents working in financial services said the most pervasive and prevalent barriers to agility include a lack of real-time transparency into projects (45 percent) and resources (56 percent), and overreliance on manual reporting such as spreadsheets (68 percent).

Other key findings include:

  • Multiple, disconnected systems stand in the way of business agility

Project managers and executives desire one connected system for project management, portfolio management, and resource management. The majority of organizations still rely on a patchwork of outdated legacy systems, including multi-tenant SaaS, hosted software, on premise software, proprietary systems, and manual spreadsheets to manage project tasks and information. The three most important project portfolio management (PPM) capabilities ranked by respondents working within financial services were project management (26 percent), resource management (23 percent) and portfolio management (22 percent). Without managing projects and resources to ensure nimble execution, the PMO and larger organization are at risk.

  • Lack of effective communication tools make projects difficult to manage

Despite the surge in business communication tools, nearly one-third (32 percent) of respondents working in financial services say they lack tools for managing better communication across teams and projects. In fact, nearly half (49 percent) of financial services professionals in the survey respondents cite communication, both intra and inter-department, as the most difficult aspect of managing a project.

  • Managing workloads and schedules is a continued hurdle to agility

Project managers within financial services spend the majority of their work day managing team workloads and schedules, with 46 percent citing this task as the most difficult aspect to project execution. Sixty-four percent of financial services project managers and executives spend more than three hours a day managing people; 59 percent spend more than three hours a day establishing and managing processes.

“To prepare for organizational change, project and business leaders must be on the same path forward. This demands confident decision making and prioritizing company initiatives,” said Shefveland. “A connected PPM system provides real-time insight and enables cross-functional communication, both important first steps to weathering organizational change.”

Research was conducted by Changepoint, a leading provider of project portfolio management, Enterprise Architecture, and Professional Services Management applications. Changepoint surveyed 1,257 project managers and executives from medium to enterprise-sized organizations in a variety of industries, including IT services, government, manufacturing, and healthcare. More than half of respondents reside in North America, a quarter live in EMEA, and the remainder are from South America and APAC. For a copy of Changepoint’s Business Agility survey, visit: http://changepoint.com/resources/white-papers/ppm-business-agility-survey-report.