Carlton Fields Releases Annual Class Action Survey Results

Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

The eighth annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey reveals a continuing rise in class action defense spending, driven by more matters per company facing these cases, and, collectively, more complex, high risk, and bet-the-company matters than ever reported in past surveys. In total, companies spent $2.46 billion defending class actions in 2018 and spending and the number of class actions defended by company are expected to increase again in 2019.

It was the fourth consecutive annual rise in spending after steadily decreasing expenditures from 2010 to 2014. The number of companies that reported facing class actions in 2018 dropped slightly to 54%, but the average number of matters per company increased from 6.3 in 2017 to 7.8 in 2018.

The 2019 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey is based on interviews with general counsel or senior legal officers at 395 Fortune 1000 and other large companies across a variety of industries.

The survey found that labor and employment cases remain the most common type of class action, accounting for 28.7% of matters and 26.1% of spending. In the past five years, nearly two-thirds of companies have faced at least one labor and employment class action and, overwhelmingly, companies report that wage and hour matters are their top concern in this category.

As predicted, class action defense spending rose again in 2018 and this is likely to continue through 2019, said Julianna McCabe, director of Carlton Fields Class Action Survey and chair of the firms National Class Actions practice group. As the resources and financing available to pursue these costly matters have become increasingly available, the volume and complexity of the class actions filed continues to rise. In-house legal departments are dedicating significant resources to these cases and relying on outside counsel for help in making early assessments of their win-loss probabilities, among other factors.

While most companies have not yet faced a data privacy class action, survey results show that they predict these cases as the next wave. The percentage of companies making such a prediction nearly doubled from last years survey, increasing from 28.9% to 54.3%. Eighty-six percent of companies have an action plan in place to address and limit the impact of a data breach, including class action exposure.

Nearly 9% of companies identified collective actions under the European Unions new privacy regulation (the GDPR) as a next wave, a significant enough number that it was reported separately in the survey. Approximately two-thirds of companies reported concern stateside, about the impending California Consumer Privacy Act.

Among additional key findings:

  • Companies increased their use of contractual arbitration clauses in 2018, and the percentage of companies that included class action waivers in their arbitration agreements increased to near 50%. More companies now use arbitration clauses that bar class actions than in any previous survey.
  • Exposure, win probability, the relevant case law and facts, and reputational impact were the class action risk variables companies ranked as most important, and more than 95% of companies report relying on outside counsel for an early assessment of win-loss probability.
  • Increasingly, companies facing class actions employ a case-by-case approach to class action management, 53.2% reporting that they defend at the right cost, assessing each case separately. Only 10.6% say they prefer to settle such matters early, while 21.3% take an aggressive stance and 14.9% employ a defend at all costs strategy.
  • Still, cases filed as class actions are most often resolved by settlement, with 53.1% of companies reporting that settlements typically occur pre-certification. Thirty-nine percent of matters filed as class actions are settled on an individual basis.
  • Companies are taking notice of the impact of the political climate in Washington on their management of class actions, with 23.5% of companies reporting that it affects regulatory oversight and involvement relevant to class actions.
  • The use of alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) in class actions declined slightly in 2018. More companies identified fixed fees as a successful type of AFA for class actions than any other type of arrangement.
  • Finally, while most companies have not seen a reduction in class action discovery costs as a result of the federal proportionality standard, companies employ a host of strategies to control electronic discovery costs: among others, the aggressive negotiation of reasonable search terms; the use of a single e-discovery vendor; and the filing of motions to stay or for cost-shifting.

The Carlton Fields Class Action Survey is widely recognized as a powerful resource for in-house counsel who want to manage class actions effectively and efficiently. Participating companies in the 2019 survey had an average annual revenue of $14.8 billion and median annual revenue of $6.7 billion. They operate in more than 25 industries, including banking and financial services, consumer goods, energy, high tech, insurance, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, professional services, and retail trade.

To download the 2019 Carlton Fields Class Action report, please visit www.classactionsurvey.com.

Read the Carlton Fields Class Action Blog.

About Carlton Fields: Carlton Fields has more than 300 attorneys and government and financial services consultants serving clients from offices in California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, and Washington, D.C. The firm is known for its national litigation practice, including class action defense, trial practice, white-collar representation, and high-stakes appeals; its insurance practice, including life and financial lines, property and casualty, reinsurance, and title insurance; its regulatory practice; and its handling of sophisticated business transactions and corporate counseling for domestic and international clients. For additional information, visit www.carltonfields.com. (Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP.)

Kate Barth
(813) 229-4154
[email protected]