Connect with us

Investing

BOLD THINKING ON CONSOLIDATION NEEDED, SAYS PLSA DB TASKFORCE 

Published

on

BOLD THINKING ON CONSOLIDATION NEEDED, SAYS PLSA DB TASKFORCE 

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association today released the second report by its Defined Benefit (DB) Taskforce, ‘The Case for Consolidation’.  The report outlines how consolidation into new superfunds could tackle the issues which place an unacceptable, and mostly unrecognised, risk on scheme members.

In its first report the DB Taskforce identified that members of schemes with the weakest employers – schemes which hold 42% of liabilities of schemes in deficit – have just a 50:50 chance of seeing those benefits paid in full.  These schemes are stuck with a choice between trying to manage this risk through heavy reliance on struggling sponsors or hoping to reach buy-out levels of funding which few can afford.  There is a clear and pressing need for an alternative option.

The Case for Consolidation’ examines four models that offer trustees an additional option that would alleviate the level of risk carried by scheme members.

  1. Shared services: combining administrative functions across schemes achieving cost savings through economies of scale. Especially beneficial to small and medium schemes and brings an estimated aggregate saving for schemes of £0.6 billion per year.
  2. Asset pooling: different schemes’ assets are pooled and managed centrally while individual schemes retain responsibility for their governance, administration, back office functions and most advisory services.  Especially beneficial to small and medium schemes and brings an estimated aggregate saving for schemes of £0.25 billion per year.
  3. Single governance: different schemes’ assets are consolidated into a single asset pool; governance, administration and back office functions are also combined. Estimated aggregate saving for schemes of £1.2 billion per year; comprised of savings from shared services (£0.6 billion), asset pooling (£0.25 billion) and single governance cost-benefits (£0.36 billion).Options one to three present valuable savings but do not materially reduce the risk faced by members of DB schemes.  The DB Taskforce’s report outlines a further potential option – the superfund.
  4. Superfund, full merger: designed to absorb and replace existing schemes.  Employers and trustees are discharged from their obligations for future benefit payments which would be paid from the superfund. According to modelling for the DB Taskforce, a consolidator like this could improve security for savers in CG41 schemes – reducing the probability of seeing their scheme fail from 65% to close to 10% or even less.

Ashok Gupta, Chair of the Defined Benefit Taskforce, commented:

“There’s a general assumption that 100% of DB scheme members are guaranteed 100% of their benefits. That is the intention but it will not be the reality. The reality is that savers in weaker schemes have a 50:50 chance of seeing their benefits paid in full. The Taskforce wants to find ways to improve those odds and building on its first report looked at four models of consolidation.

“We think the biggest gains lie in the merger of schemes, into what we have called superfunds. We believe superfunds have the potential to offer great benefits to members, employers, the regulator, the industry and the economy.

“Members get a better chance of more pension benefits being paid. Employers get a lower cost alternative to a buy-out. The regulator gets a sector with better managed risks. The economy benefits from improved investment by superfunds and employers are freed from onerous DB burdens.”

Graham Vidler, Director of External Affairs, Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, said:

“The Taskforce was asked to think about solutions and it has – including the new and bold idea of superfunds. There’s work to be done on developing the superfund idea and the Taskforce will be analysing it in detail over the coming months so we can contribute fully to the Government’s Green Paper consultation.”

A copy of the PLSA DB Report ‘The Case for Consolidation’ is attached.  The Taskforce Interim Report can be found on our website here.

We have provided a set of Q&A to answer any initial queries you may have – please see Notes to Editors.

Ashok Gupta will present ‘The Case for Consolidation’ on 9 March at the PLSA Investment Conference in Edinburgh.  The session will be web-streamed live and available to view by registering here.

Investing

Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution?

Published

on

Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution? 1

By Matt Dickens, Senior Business Development Director at Ingenious

Financial planners and wealth managers strive to deliver on the needs of their clients by always providing the most suitable and effective advice. But as with any service, this advice should also be delivered at the best possible value for the investor. Value can be simplistically defined as the service that delivers the most benefit, balanced against the financial cost, but in the estate planning space, how do you assess what good value is?

1. Total fees and charges

Product fees are guaranteed to negatively impact returns, so it is important to minimise their impact when looking to gain the best value from the investment. Some managers report little or no fees paid by the investor to the manager, but instead charge the company or investment service itself. While this might initially be seen as better value for the investor, it is not as simple as that. Investors in unlisted BR services become a shareholder of the portfolio companies, so the reality is that any fees paid by the companies are effectively being paid by the shareholder (or investor). Therefore, both investor fees and company fees will both negatively impact the final return and must be considered together.

Analysis of what a manager is paid by the investor and by the company over a significant period will enable an adviser to conclude if the manager is offering good value, or if a disproportionate amount of fees is going to the manager at the expense of their investors.

2. Real investment returns

Another key component of assessing value is what the investment actually delivers. For BR solutions, investors’ main objective is commonly to pass on the maximum sum possible to their beneficiaries upon death. This may lead to a conclusion that delivering Inheritance Tax relief at the lowest possible cost is the primary driver of value. However, especially for clients with longer time horizons, the one-dimensional goal of avoiding a potential 40% Inheritance Tax bill can easily over-shadow the equally important goal of aiming to steadily grow the investment, preventing erosion by inflation, drawdowns and investment fees. Unlike some IHT-focused solutions, such as trusts or gifting, investors in BR services do not have to accept zero growth of their wealth from the point of investment.  Instead, investors can continue to earn returns, either taking an income stream or increasing the final sum to be passed onto their beneficiaries, precisely in line with their original objective.

While most BR managers predict their ongoing returns at a certain level, those targets are not guaranteed and historic performance varies widely.

3. The relationship between fees and risk

Given that the majority of managers in the BR space state their performance targets net of fees, to produce positive growth and achieve their target return, those managers must first earn back any fees they are taking. Let’s take the below scenario to illustrate this point.

 Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution? 2Manager 1

Annual performance target, net of fees: 3%

Annual fees: 3%

Gross performance target: 6%

 

Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution? 3Manager 2

Annual performance target, net of fees: 4%

Annual fees: 1%

Gross performance target: 5%

Initially, it might appear that Manager 2 must be taking more risk to target a higher net return of 4% than Manager 1, who is targeting 3%. However, Manager 1 has to deliver an additional 2% of gross return than Manager 2, to make up for charging higher fees. Higher fees not only impact returns and value, but they can also mean greater risk.

Market comparison

In the Tax Efficient Review’s most recent analysis of Unlisted BR Services1, they released data that ranks services in the market in terms of both investor returns and total fees. IEP Private Real Estate achieved the top rank for returns delivered, with the second lowest total fees in the market, demonstrating that it represents attractive value for investors in comparison to other services.

Continue Reading

Investing

Reuters Events Launch Global Investment Summit Online Edition Uniting Institutional Investors, Asset Owners & Financial Institutions

Published

on

Reuters Events – today announced the agenda for their Global Investment Summit (Dec 3rd -4th). The 2-day strategic summit has been reimagined in the era of social distancing and will be broadcast free of charge to the public.

This Summit, with a diverse range of international voices and anchored by Reuters News-led sessions, is the only place for institutional investors, asset owners and financial institutions to come to terms with the events of 2020.

Click for more information and for complimentary registration to the online edition

The Energy Transition team report an industry leading speaker faculty for 2020, including:

  • Eileen Murray, Chair, Finra
  • Philip Lane, Chief Economist, European Central Bank
  • Gregory Davis, Chief Investment Officer, Vanguard
  • Hanneke Smits, CEO, BNY Mellon Investment Management
  • Pascal Blanque, Chief Investment Officer, Amundi
  • Desiree Fixler, Group Chief Sustainability Officer, DWS
  • Joe Lubin, CEO, Consensys
  • Bahren Shaari, CEO, Bank of Singapore
  • Mark Machin, CEO, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

The agenda released by Reuters Events Investment is both ambitious and comprehensive, and will cover four key themes: Market Outlook, Asset Management Strategies, Industry Deep-Dives and the Future of Investment.

View the full agenda here

Continue Reading

Investing

Halliburton & Baker Hughes CEO’s join Reuters Events: Energy Transition 2020

Published

on

Reuters Events – today announced that CEO’s of two of the world’s leading energy service companies, Halliburton and Baker Hughes, will join the speaker faculties for their flagship Energy Transition Summit.

The event will explore the creation of the future energy ecosystem and offer companies, from across the asset spectrum, a definitive guide to their net-zero strategies. The alignment of the two biggest O&G global service companies, Halliburton and Baker Hughes, represents a significant step in the transition to low-carbon energy

More information on the Europe and North America editions can be found below. Registration for the LIVE stream is free.

Alongside their CEO speaker representation, Halliburton join as Platinum sponsors of the North American edition. Baker Hughes join as gold sponsors for the European edition of the flagship energy transition program.

The Energy Transition team report an industry leading speaker faculty for 2020, including:

  • Lorenzo Simonelli, Chairman & CEO, Baker Hughes
  • Jeff Miller, CEO & President, Jeff Miller
  • Tristan Grimbert, CEO, EDF Renewables
  • John Pettigrew, Chief Executive, National Grid
  • Pratima Rangarajan, CEO, OGCI Climate Investments
  • Alex Schneiter, CEO & President, Lundin Energy
  • Gretchen Watkins, President, Shell Oil Company
  • Calvin Butler Jr., CEO, Exelon Utilities
  • Francis Fannon, Assistant Secretary ERB, S. Department of State
  • David Lawler, Chairman & President, bp America
  • Andreas Schierenbeck, CEO, Uniper

More information on the Europe and North America editions can be found below. Registration for the LIVE stream is free.

Governance & Cooperation – Does the energy transition face a ‘governance deficit’? To understand how the energy transition will develop over the next decade, it is crucial to understand the driving governing forces behind it. Will the Green Deal provide the first domino, how can we ensure progress in the shadow of Aberdeen and ensure that we translate targets into action?

Financing Energy Transition – We must address the elephant in the room; who is going to pay for it all? An understanding of where the funds are likely to come from is key to staking claim to the infrastructural projects that will redefine the modern world in the 21st century.

New Energy Infrastructure – Low-carbon energy supply and consumption will need a radical overhaul of infrastructure. As well as revamping the old, we’ll need entirely new assets and new systems of energy delivery. It’s an unprecedented opportunity with estimated spending at $70 trillion over the next decade. Knowing which technologies are ready to be scaled first is the key to understanding opportunity

Business Model Innovation – Who will provide leadership through the age of transition and how do we want our future energy system to look? Speed and timing will be crucial if you are to stay on the right side of the transition. Join us in setting business led, evidence based, targets as industry drives towards net-zero

More information on the Europe and North America editions can be found below. Registration for the LIVE stream is free.

At Reuters Events, we’re committed to tackling the Energy Transition head on; to shed light on the defining issue of our time and help energy companies meet a uniquely difficult challenge. That is, to be both an energy company of today, and the energy companies of tomorrow. In a period that will be defined by uncertainty we can, together, lighten the way forward.” – Owen Rolt, Head of Energy Transition, Reuters Events

Contact

Owen Rolt

Head of Energy Transition

Reuters Events

UK: +44 (0) 207 375 7596

E: [email protected]

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2020
2020 Global Banking & Finance Awards now open. Click Here

Latest Articles

Entersekt provides clarity on Secure Remote Commerce authentication techniques for financial institutions 4 Entersekt provides clarity on Secure Remote Commerce authentication techniques for financial institutions 5
Technology10 hours ago

Entersekt provides clarity on Secure Remote Commerce authentication techniques for financial institutions

New whitepaper from Mercator available: Revisiting Authentication in the Age of SRC and EMV 3-D Secure Is it time for...

Thinking Long-Term When Your Shareholders Won’t Let You 7 Thinking Long-Term When Your Shareholders Won’t Let You 8
Business11 hours ago

Thinking Long-Term When Your Shareholders Won’t Let You

By MaryLee Sachs, US CEO, Brandpie In a recent study of nearly 700 CEOs across the US and Europe, my...

Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution? 9 Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution? 10
Investing11 hours ago

Are clients truly getting value from their BR solution?

By Matt Dickens, Senior Business Development Director at Ingenious Financial planners and wealth managers strive to deliver on the needs...

New TransUnion Study Finds Smooth Digital Transactions “Essential to Business Survival” During and After Pandemic 13 New TransUnion Study Finds Smooth Digital Transactions “Essential to Business Survival” During and After Pandemic 14
Business15 hours ago

New TransUnion Study Finds Smooth Digital Transactions “Essential to Business Survival” During and After Pandemic

Economist Intelligence Unit report for TransUnion highlights the crucial role emerging technologies will play in balancing fraud prevention and customer...

How technology has made us communicate better in crisis 15 How technology has made us communicate better in crisis 16
Business17 hours ago

How technology has made us communicate better in crisis

By Pete Hanlon, CTO of Moneypenny COVID-19 has taught us a lot. We have embraced technology, some might say, survived...

Futureproofing Your Credit Management Now 17 Futureproofing Your Credit Management Now 18
Finance17 hours ago

Futureproofing Your Credit Management Now

By Marieke Saeij, CEO, Onguard The pandemic has forced a shift in day-to-day operations for the majority of businesses. In...

Will covid-19 end the dominance of the big four? 19 Will covid-19 end the dominance of the big four? 20
Top Stories1 day ago

Will covid-19 end the dominance of the big four?

By Campbell Shaw, Head of Bank Partnerships, Cardlytics Across the country, we are readjusting to refreshed restrictions on our daily...

Why cybercriminals have ‘Gone Vishing’ during the COVID-19 Pandemic 21 Why cybercriminals have ‘Gone Vishing’ during the COVID-19 Pandemic 22
Business1 day ago

Why cybercriminals have ‘Gone Vishing’ during the COVID-19 Pandemic

More than 215,000 vishing attempts in the last year alone As new coronavirus restrictions look set to confine much of...

Risk Mitigation vs. Risk Avoidance: Why FIs Need to Maintain Risk Appetite and Not Place All Bets on De-Risking 23 Risk Mitigation vs. Risk Avoidance: Why FIs Need to Maintain Risk Appetite and Not Place All Bets on De-Risking 24
Finance1 day ago

Risk Mitigation vs. Risk Avoidance: Why FIs Need to Maintain Risk Appetite and Not Place All Bets on De-Risking

De-risking aims to protect financial institutions from the increasing pressures placed by regulators and threats, associated with clients operating in...

Using AI to identify public sector fraud 25 Using AI to identify public sector fraud 26
Technology2 days ago

Using AI to identify public sector fraud

When it comes to audits in the public sector, both accountability and transparency are essential. Not only is the public...

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now