Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >Bayer blasts ‘unscientific’ rejection by Mexican regulator of GMO corn permit
    Business

    Bayer Blasts ‘unscientific’ Rejection by Mexican Regulator of Gmo Corn Permit

    Published by maria gbaf

    Posted on October 11, 2021

    2 min read

    Last updated: January 29, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    An image depicting a CFO analyzing financial reports and trends for 2022, highlighting the evolving role of finance leaders in strategic business growth.
    CFO reviewing financial data and trends for 2022 - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Quick Summary

    Bayer's GMO corn permit was rejected by Mexico's Cofepris, citing unscientific reasons. Bayer is evaluating legal options, fearing supply chain impacts.

    Bayer Criticizes Mexican Regulator's GMO Corn Permit Denial

    By David Alire Garcia

    MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Bayer is evaluating its legal options after Mexican health regulators for the first time rejected a GMO corn permit it was seeking, the German pharmaceutical and crop science giant said in a statement to Reuters on Friday, blasting the decision as “unscientific.”

    Reuters reported earlier in the day that regulator Cofepris rejected the corn permit for future import as the government of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador hardens its opposition to genetically modified crops.

    “We are disappointed with the unscientific reasons that Cofepris used to deny the authorization,” the statement said, identifying the rejected corn variety as using its proprietary HT3 x SmartStax Pro technology.

    Bayer stressed that the permit denial does not affect its current business, noting that last year the company stopped work on its HT3 hybrid corn varieties due to regulatory delays in the European Union in favor of a new HT4 line which the company expects to launch later this decade.

    Bayer nonetheless criticized what it described as continuous regulatory delays with Cofepris as well as the possibility of additional permit denials that could have a “devastating impact” on Mexican supply chains.

    The company said genetically modified crops including corn have undergone more safety tests than “any other crop in the history of agriculture” and have been judged safe for humans, animals and the environment.

    The Cofepris press office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    Lopez Obrador issued a controversial decree at the end of last year that outlined a three-year plan to ban the weed killer glyphosate and GMO corn for human consumption.

    Industry associations have sharply criticized the plan and have sought unsuccessfully to persuade judges to strike it down, arguing that it risks a trade dispute with the United States. If the ban is interpreted to include animal feed or other industrial uses, they say it will ultimately hit consumers with higher food prices.

    The planned prohibition, however, is popular with environmentalists and health-food advocates who argue that spraying glyphosate on the GMO crops designed to tolerate them is indeed harmful.

    Glyphosate was pioneered by the Roundup brand of weed killers from agrochemical company Monsanto, which was bought by Bayer as part of a $63 billion acquisition in 2018.

    (Reporting by David Alire Garcia in Mexico City;Editing by Christian Plumb and Matthew Lewis)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Bayer's GMO corn permit rejected by Mexican regulators.
    • •Bayer considers legal options against the decision.
    • •Rejection based on unscientific reasons, says Bayer.
    • •Potential impact on Mexican supply chains.
    • •Controversy over glyphosate and GMO corn ban in Mexico.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Bayer blasts ‘unscientific’ rejection by Mexican regulator of GMO corn permit

    1What is the main topic?

    The main topic is Bayer's legal response to the rejection of its GMO corn permit by Mexican regulators.

    2Why was Bayer's permit rejected?

    The permit was rejected by Cofepris due to what Bayer describes as unscientific reasons.

    3What are the implications of the rejection?

    The rejection could impact Mexican supply chains and has sparked controversy over GMO and glyphosate bans.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Nominate Now: Chairman of the Year 2026
    Nominate Now: Chairman of the Year 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for CEO of the Year 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for CEO of the Year 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Best Management Team 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Best Management Team 2026
    Image for Nominate Your Team: Best Innovation Management Team 2026
    Nominate Your Team: Best Innovation Management Team 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostGlobal Tax Deal Seeks to End Havens, Criticized for ‘no Teeth’
    Next Business PostBritish Industry Warns of Factory Closures Without Help on Fuel Costs