Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Asset Managers Support Call for Regulation of ESG Data, Research and Ratings

Published by linker 5

Posted on December 28, 2020

3 min read

Last updated: January 21, 2026

Add as preferred source on Google

Asset managers discuss ESG data regulation and transparency - Global Banking & Finance Review — A group of asset managers considers the importance of regulating ESG data and ratings. This image highlights the growing demand for transparency in sustainable investments, reflecting the article's focus on the call for European regulation in the financial sector.

EFAMA, the voice of the European investment management industry, joins the French and Dutch financial market authorities’ call for a European regulation of ESG data, research and ratings.

European asset managers are observing a double-digit growth in the demand for ESG investments, and clients are increasingly sophisticated in their preferences^[1]

Giorgio Botta, EFAMA Regulatory Policy Advisor, commented: “Asset managers wish to encourage this ESG investment trend by expanding their offering of sustainable products and by providing investors with trustworthy and comparable information – also in response to EU regulation introduced to fight greenwashing and enhance transparency. To fulfil these objectives, investors need solid and reliable data. Given the lack of publicly available information, asset managers are heavily reliant on the information from third-party providers of ESG data, research and ratings, which comes with high costs and many questions.”

Market concentration and costs: EFAMA members observe an increasing concentration in the market for ESG information, partly driven by merger activity, and rising ESG data costs. This spike in the cost of ESG data is particularly detrimental to smaller firms which have less resources and bargaining power, and to end-investors who ultimately foot the bill.
Comparability and reliability: third-party ESG data and research are often inconsistent, and ratings may vary considerably among providers. This limits the reliability, comparability and usefulness of the information provided and expose investors to the risk of greenwashing.
Transparency on methodologies: The methodologies used by third-party providers to gather and process data lack transparency. More transparency would enable asset managers to ascertain that the information provided can be safely relied on in the context of their investment and product development strategies.
Potential conflicts of interest: the offering of a broad range of products and services by third-party providers, combined with high market concentration, raises conflict of interest concerns. To preserve market integrity, rules aimed at identifying and managing potential conflicts of interest are needed.
Dialogue with rated companies: to improve the quality of research and ratings, and avoid factually incorrect analyses and misleading or incorrect conclusions, third-party providers should step up their dialogue with rated companies. This would help them produce research and ratings that better capture the context in which companies operate.

As indicated in EFAMA’s response to the European Commission’s consultation on the renewed sustainable finance strategy^[2], it is important to improve the functioning of the ESG data, research and ratings market. The renewed strategy provides an excellent opportunity to address the industry’s concerns related to the transparency on methodologies and the management of conflicts of interest. EFAMA therefore recommends the European Commission to develop a European regulatory framework for providers of ESG data, research and ratings, in line with the recent joint call from the AFM and AMF.