Connect with us

Investing

ASK THE EXPERT: 5 TOP TIPS FOR INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE OUTSIDE THE UK

Published

on

ASK THE EXPERT: 5 TOP TIPS FOR INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE OUTSIDE THE UK 3

By Louise

• £25.2 billion worth of exports from UK during July (HMRC)
• Property investment generates best long-term gains (Wriglesworth Consultancy)
• Hotel suite investment set to provide returns of 56.66% (North Dakota Developments LLC)

At a national level, billions of pounds flow into and out of the UK each month in trade and investment. According to HM Revenue & Customs’ UK Overseas Trade Statistics, July 2014 alone saw £38.2 billion of imports and £25.5 billion of exports.

While such large numbers may be difficult to relate to, many individuals are contributing to the flow of money into and out of the UK on a smaller scale, through overseas property investment.

ASK THE EXPERT: 5 TOP TIPS FOR INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE OUTSIDE THE UK 4Property is increasingly being seen as one of the best ways to make money over the longer term. A report from the Wriglesworth Consultancy earlier this year examined the matter in detail. Wriglesworth considered the investment of £1,000 in property in 1996 and looked at what it would have returned across a range of investments in the final quarter of 2013. Returns generated would have been: £1,949 from cash; £2,924 from gilts; £3,654 from UK commercial property investment; and £13,048 from buy-to-let property.

From single family homes, to workforce accommodation in areas of high demand – such as the oilfields of North Dakota – property that is developed to earn yields from rental income takes many forms, allowing investors to benefit from capital growth at the same time as rental income.

So how does the average investor know where to start, particularly when it comes to overseas property investment?

Here, property and real estate expert Robert Gavin – Group CEO of specialist property developer North Dakota Developments – offers his five top tips for investing in property outside the UK:

1. Due diligence

Firstly, do your research. Don’t just look at the investment itself but the story behind it. Why is accommodation needed in that particular area and at that particular time? How strong is the rental demand and how long is it likely to remain so? How has the property market in that area developed over time? Be sure to have solid answers to all of these questions before moving forward with any potential property investment.

2. Credentials

Consider the company you are planning to invest with and their partners on the property development and look for companies with established credentials.

3. Past successes

Examine a company’s past successes to see how previous investors have made money, over what period and what their level of returns have been. Don’t be shy to ask questions about previous projects, including what the company has learned from them to make their latest project development even better.

4. Transparency

A good developer will keep their investors up to date on the latest progress at each site, including any delays, the reasons behind them and the details of how they are being dealt with. No major construction project runs smoothly from start to finish – there are always complications such as freak weather or delayed delivery of materials. Despite this, a decent developer should be able to overcome the issues while keeping their investors fully informed. A trustworthy company has nothing to hide.

5. Testimonials

Don’t just take the company at face value – look at what others have said about them. Read testimonials from investors in the company’s previous projects to get an idea how the company has helped them make money, the level of customer care provided and general customer satisfaction.

For more information on the award-winning North Dakota Developments and their exciting new Transhudson Hotel – Parshall in the Bakken oilfields of North Dakota, call +44 (0) 845 053 7498, email [email protected] or visit www.northdakotadevelopments.com.

Investing

Can Thematic Investing provide investors with growth opportunities in uncertain times?

Published

on

The impact of COVID-19 on the investment market

New whitepaper from CAMRADATA explores

CAMRADATA’s latest whitepaper on Thematic Investing, considers the role this type of investing can play in asset management and explores trends that can permeate society and traverse sectors. The whitepaper includes insights from guests who attended a virtual roundtable on Thematic Investing hosted by CAMRADATA in November, including representatives from CPR Asset Management, Sarasin & Partners, Impact Investing Institute, PwC, Quilter Cheviot, Scottish Widows and Stonehage Fleming.

Sean Thompson, Managing Director, CAMRADATA said, “In these seminal times, thematic investing has the potential to shape how the future unfolds. Yet running a successful thematic fund is no easy feat – it is a bit like navigating unchartered waters trying to identify the trends and the long-term opportunities.

“Trends such as AI and biotechnology are still in their relative early days, for example, and global economies are undergoing dramatic changes. But mapping out certain trends, identifying potential sustainable returns through a unifying thread that spans multiple sectors, could help future-proof investments. “Our roundtable guests considered current key themes, which themes worked well, and which have not and how thematic investors could identify trends with the potential to offer future growth.”

The guests named themes they currently like which included artificial intelligence, China, climate change, clean energy, automation, evolving consumption, ageing, digitalisation, water, waste management, biodiversity, and board diversity.

After discussing themes that have worked or not, the guests looked at total allocation to themed funds, and whether clients might be blinded by themes to the overall risk exposure in their portfolios.

Key takeaway points were:

  • Themes have a habit of coming and going. One guest recognised that automation and robotics, for example, were cyclical, which means that investors will have to think carefully about entry-points.
  • It was agreed that the commodities ‘super cycle’ of the 2000s came about with the economic development of China. Many commodities-based products found their way into mainstream investing, but this is unlikely to happen again.
  • One guest was surprised by some of the themes that interested their customers; with their research showing that Board Diversity was almost the lowest-ranking concern among the ESG choices they listed.
  • There was correlation between environmental impact and social benefits to investing. The theme that concerns the Impact Investing Institute, which is less than two years old, is improved measurement of such relationships.
  • In terms of successful themes, one clear winner due to COVID had been digitalisation.
  • One theme that has not done so well is the Ageing theme focused on older people travelling and enjoying experiences abroad later in life.
  • One guest said their firm used themes for ideas generation, not as a shortcut for portfolio construction. They said themes lead to good ideas, but they then spend at least three months researching a stock, so that the best themes are represented by the best investments.
  • The final point was that there are sensitivities for any global investor in allocating to themes, even the biggest one of all, Climate Change.
  • But on a positive note, one guest added if all stakeholders can resolve their differences on definitions such as impact and ethical investing, then more capital will be readily transferred into opportunities.

The whitepaper also features two articles from the sponsors offering valuable additional insight. These are:

  • CPR Asset Management: ‘Central Banks: leading the path towards Impact Investing’
  • Sarasin & Partners: ‘Theme or fad? How to invest for the long term’

To download the Thematic Investing whitepaper, click here

For more information on CAMRADATA visit www.camradata.com

Continue Reading

Investing

Promises, Promises: Navigating the Reputational Risks of ESG Investment Pledges

Published

on

Why are people investing in music?

By Nir Kossovsky and Denise Williamee, Steel City Re

As the trend towards ESG investment and a low-carbon economy continues, banks are being backed into a reputational corner. Law firms specializing in representing the expanding pool of litigious shareholders are salivating.

On one hand, banks understand the inherent financial risks and challenges involved with making a wholesale move towards a low-carbon economy. The transition to a greener corporate world can’t happen overnight; as long as “brown” assets continue to be profitable, those in bank leadership positions have to balance their green aspirations with their responsibility to shareholders.

On the other hand, while not renewing loans on existing coal mines or fracking sites may improve a bank’s carbon disclosures, it could have social and financial ramifications that disappoint other stakeholders—i.e., causing people to lose their jobs. Still, financial institutions are experiencing pressure from all sides—from ESG investors to social license holders – to divest the fossil fuel industry and adopt drastic “green financing” practices now.

To alleviate these pressures, banks are pledging greener financing initiatives. Almost every large global bank has made some sort of commitment. Goldman Sachs, for example, announced they would spend $750 billion on sustainable finance over the next decade. Bank of America pledged $300 billion.

Bank boards and executives likely don’t fully appreciate the reputational risks posed by the aspirational statements they’re making. They are making promises and raising expectations without the operational or governance systems in place to ensure those expectations will actually be met. Overpromising and increasing the risk of angering and disappointing stakeholders is the very definition of reputational risk.

Banks are in a unique position: integral to every aspect of our economy, well-known brands that work hard to build and retain the trust of their customers and the general public while operating in an environment of intense scrutiny by politicians and regulators at every level of government. Satisfying all the stakeholders calling for greener policies while fulfilling their responsibility to their shareholders is a demanding balancing act fraught with risk. The Business Roundtable pledge, led by JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, and elevating employees, communities, and the environment as stakeholders, was an attempt to strike that balance. Already, though, that pledge is being dismissed by politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren, who characterized it as an “empty publicity stunt.”

The price of missing expectations is costly, and bank executives and board members could find themselves in a legal hot seat. Federal securities lawsuit filings alleging reputation harm from missed expectations are up 60% over last year, the third year of a rising trend.

This trend stems from SEC regulation S-K that calls for more human capital disclosures, and the Caremark decision that sets the bar for most securities litigation and makes board oversight of mission-critical corporate operations a test of the duty of loyalty. Other cases, like In Re Signet, have made ESG-like pronouncements—historically “immaterial corporate puffery”—now potentially material in the securities arena.

For example, directors’ duty of loyalty were successfully questioned in alleged failures of innovation (In Re Clovis Oncology, Inc., board failure to protect the firm’s reputation for pharmacologic innovation); safety (Marchand v. Blue Bell Creameries, board failure to protect the company’s reputation for food safety); and environmental sustainability (Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc. v. Armstrong, board failure to protect the firm’s reputation for oil pipeline-related environmental protection).

In other words, aspirational pledges are now being considered by courts with the full weight of a material public disclosure. As wealth managers chase ESG-informed investing and capital markets chase ‘green underwriting’, the plaintiff’s bar chases boards and executives making pledges that appear to be no more than aspirational marketing.

The only way to strike a balance and mitigate these risks is through a robust Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) strategy that’s centered around understanding who your key stakeholders are, what their interests are, and ultimately, what their expectations are. Coincidentally, it is also one of the three key behaviors the world’s largest asset management firm, Blackrock, is demanding of all investee companies in 2021 thus communicating the type of authenticity to its slogan “beyond investing,” that BP failed to accomplish with similar sloganeering a decade ago.

Banks need to create a central intelligence unit with board level oversight to comb through every aspect of the organization to identify stakeholder interests, potential risks and/or exposures. Pledges and communications should be informed by a rigorous and honest self-assessment of the institution’s public filings and operational capacity. Overpromising is costly. ESG pledges must be rooted in achievable goals that a bank’s leadership are confident their institutions can reasonably execute on an operational level. Banks also need to consider transferring or financing risks using the broad range of conventional and parametric insurance products currently available.

Enterprise risk management, when executed properly, will fulfill ESG commitments, reassure stakeholder groups and give marketers, counsel, and investment as well as government relations professionals an authentic story to tell about strong corporate governance. ERM focused on reputational intelligence will provide confidence to ESG funds, institutional investors, bond raters, and government officials alike.

The popularity of ESG investment and chasing ESG ratings is not going to go away, and stakeholder pressures will continue to mount. Investors doubled the size of the ESG sector this year, putting $27.4 billion into ETFs traded in U.S. markets. According to a recent survey conducted by Bank of America relating to ‘Gen Z’—which is just entering the workforce—80% take ESG into account when making their investment decisions.

Bank leadership that is striving to attain the correct balance between stakeholders and shareholders need to lean more into the “governance” portion of the ESG equation; pledges backed by enterprise risk management are the strongest pledges you can make.

Continue Reading

Investing

ESG – Bubble or Bandwagon?

Published

on

Portfolios that a daring young investor may choose

By Josh Gregory, Founder of Sugi

Isaac Newton was a successful investor, but he lost a fortune (£15m in today’s money) in the South Sea Bubble of 1720. When asked about his misadventure, he supposedly replied that he ‘could calculate the motions of the heavenly stars, but not the madness of people’ (presumably, himself included). 

The rise and fall of South Sea stock was one of the earliest and largest instances of a market bubble and crash. Three hundred years later, we’re facing another massive investing trend: sustainable investing. In the last year or so, almost every investment institution has jumped on the sustainability bandwagon. 

It’s now arguably more notable to find an asset manager who hasn’t committed to sustainable, ethical, responsible, impact and/or ESG (environmental, social and governance) investing than one who has. The numbers are telling: in August 2020, assets in global ESG exchange traded funds and products topped $100 billion (£73 billion) globally. 

Demand for sustainable investments has been bolstered by two main factors. Firstly, with climate change firmly on the global agenda and all eyes watching the Biden administration’s transition to power (and the subsequent climate change policy that will follow), ‘greening up’ has never been more of a priority for businesses and individuals. This includes the investment industry, with both retail and institutional investors increasingly demanding that their money has a positive impact on our planet. 

Secondly, since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic reports have continually claimed that ESG funds are outperforming ‘traditional’ investments. No longer is going green cited as a ‘nice to have’; rather, these reports demonstrate the value and resilience of ESG funds to the investor community, increasing demand. Surely, this can only be a good thing? Yes, but only if investors know what they’re buying. 

It’s no secret that ESG investing suffers from complexity, lack of transparency and a lack of any universal standard. Fundamentally, this is why we created Sugi – a new platform enabling retail investors to track the environmental impact of their investment portfolios using clear and objective carbon impact data. 

Josh Gregory

Josh Gregory

Today, ESG terms can lawfully be used to label pretty much anything. Ultimately, this means that the ESG label is not a guarantee of good practice. In fact, an ESG rating is a financial risk metric – the scores calculate the extent to which ESG issues affect a company’s economic value. Many investors, even institutional investors, don’t know how to decipher this. The scores themselves are designed to be used in tandem with portfolio dashboards and other data to make financial decisions. This effectively means that the scores on their own without any context are not of much use to anyone.

This has led to a glut of greenwashing in the sector, where investment products are described as green, ethical or sustainable, but the description is unsubstantiated. And while the top financial performance of ESG funds seems uncontroversial, those digging a little deeper may be surprised at what they find. Many ESG funds are heavily weighted in favour of technology companies, which typically have low carbon emissions. These stocks skyrocketed in 2020 but it’s important to note the context. It was largely due to the COVID-19 lockdowns and had nothing to do with the stocks’ ESG credentials. 

The EU, the UK and the US are all working on their own strict definitions of ESG. This should, in theory, go some way to clarify what investors are getting when they choose an ESG or sustainable investment product. However, this will take a while to implement and there will still not be a globally recognised definition or standard. 

It would seem many people are pouring money into investments when they don’t know what they’re buying. That’s nothing new. But underneath the ESG label lies something meaningful, worthwhile and, above all, valuable for the world in which we live – environmental, social and governance best practice.

The question remains though, is it a bubble? A bubble exists if ESG investments are over-valued (i.e. over-bought). Right now, ESG funds may be in bubble territory because many of the underlying stocks that make up the funds are themselves in a bubble. But does that make ESG a bubble? If it is, when do we call it? 

Historically, all bubbles –whether they be tulips, canals, railways or the internet – no-one knows. And if I knew now, I’d be sunning in the South Seas rather than writing this blog!

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate

Latest Articles

Bank of England sets out interim 'bail-in' debt targets for banks 5 Bank of England sets out interim 'bail-in' debt targets for banks 6
Business19 mins ago

Bank of England sets out interim ‘bail-in’ debt targets for banks

via Reuters LONDON (Reuters) – The Bank of England on Tuesday set out interim levels of special debt that banks...

British firms call for immediate $10.3 billion in COVID aid 7 British firms call for immediate $10.3 billion in COVID aid 8
Business23 mins ago

British firms call for immediate $10.3 billion in COVID aid

via Reuters By William Schomberg LONDON (Reuters) – British firms called on Tuesday for another 7.6 billion pounds ($10.3 billion)...

BOJ's policy review may make ETF buying more flexible - Reuters poll 9 BOJ's policy review may make ETF buying more flexible - Reuters poll 10
Business26 mins ago

BOJ’s policy review may make ETF buying more flexible – Reuters poll

via Reuters   By Kaori Kaneko TOKYO (Reuters) – The Bank of Japan will likely focus on measures to make...

Trends influencing the 2020 data storage landscape includeAI, mass adoption of hybrid cloud, object storage at the edge, and cybersecurity Trends influencing the 2020 data storage landscape includeAI, mass adoption of hybrid cloud, object storage at the edge, and cybersecurity
Technology4 hours ago

Holding Cloud To Account, How Cloud Adds Up In Financial Services

By Dom Poloniecki, General Manager, Western Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa at Nutanix Cloud computing and the deployment of increasingly cloud-native...

What’s in store for Financial Services in 2021? 11 What’s in store for Financial Services in 2021? 12
Finance4 hours ago

What’s in store for Financial Services in 2021?

By Miroslava Betinova, Head of Strategic Sales at PPS If there is anything that 2020 taught us, it is the...

Iron Mountain 2021 Outlook 13 Iron Mountain 2021 Outlook 14
Top Stories4 hours ago

Iron Mountain 2021 Outlook

By Stuart Bernard, VP of Digital Solutions at Iron Mountain The Covid-19 pandemic is continuing to rewrite the rules governing...

Capital Markets: The Last Frontier for Digital Transformation in Financial Services 15 Capital Markets: The Last Frontier for Digital Transformation in Financial Services 16
Trading4 hours ago

Capital Markets: The Last Frontier for Digital Transformation in Financial Services

By Dr. Avtar Singh Sehra, CEO, Nivaura The last decade has seen financial services undergo vast digital transformation. New technologies...

Worldline launches Data as a Service platform for online payments 17 Worldline launches Data as a Service platform for online payments 18
Finance5 hours ago

Worldline launches Data as a Service platform for online payments

The new service enables users to do more with their data and is paving the way for a more insightful...

Jack Henry shares six areas of focus for financial institutions in 2021 19 Jack Henry shares six areas of focus for financial institutions in 2021 20
Top Stories5 hours ago

Jack Henry shares six areas of focus for financial institutions in 2021

Reflecting back on 2020, the community banking and credit union industries should be proud of how this unprecedented pandemic and...

Voice Quality Matters: Quarter of Employees Working From Home Still Experiencing Regular Connectivity Issues 21 Voice Quality Matters: Quarter of Employees Working From Home Still Experiencing Regular Connectivity Issues 22
Business22 hours ago

Voice Quality Matters: Quarter of Employees Working From Home Still Experiencing Regular Connectivity Issues

-Survey of 1007 SMEs in the UK by Spitfire Network Services Ltd reveals pain points for employees working from home-...

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now