Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

ARE US AND ASIAN INVESTORS BUYING CONTROL OF EUROPE’S TECH FUTURE?

  • US and Asian investors provided 76% of all the capital invested in European late stage tech in the last 12 months, and stand to benefit most from Europe’s unprecedented success in tech

Europe has created an unprecedented number of tech companies these last ten years.  Early stage money, once so hard to come by, is now 25% of US levels, an astonishing statistic given how young the European tech industry is.

Yet it is later stage money which is so crucial to creating global winners, and where so much of the real value is generated. By the time a tech companies achieves a $1B exit, late stage investors usually own-most of the equity.

While European tech has come very far in terms of early stage money available, later stage money remains elusive for most growth companies; US tech attracts 4x the early stage money available in Europe, but 10x the late stage money.

Surprisingly, according to a recent Magister Advisors analysis, what little late stage money that is available is mainly provided by US and Asian investors.  While it’s no secret international capital has been flowing to Europe in greater amounts, surprisingly over half of all late stage rounds were driven by US or Asian capital.

The impact is even greater when we look at total amount, rather than number of rounds.  US and Asian investors have driven 76% of all the capital invested in European late stage tech. The largest rounds creating the biggest tech companies are driven disproportionately by international interest.

chart1

The implications are clear:

  • European tech has ‘come of age’ the last five years, attracting more money from international investors overall; all signs point to this growing even more over the coming five to ten years
  • Because of the lack of European late stage investors, the most promising European tech players have mainly been funded by overseas capital. While this is a huge validation of the quality and attractiveness of European tech competitors, it is also a huge indictment of the ‘local’ tech investment marketplace.
  • Put simply, the quality of available ‘demand’ (companies looking for funding) far outstrips EU capital ‘supply.’. There are far too few late stage EU investment funds in Europe to fuel the next generation of winners.
  • European investors have started responding. 1/3 of all $400m later stage European tech funds have been raised since the start of 2016, but the evidence shows its still far short of the available quality supply.

chart2

While the imbalance is slowing changing, we expect the number of European success stories deserving of late stage funding will double in the next years.  We cannot see how the gap can be filled quickly enough by the still sub-scale European late stage sector, so unless something changes fast we expect over 80% of all capital for these companies to be driven by investors outside the EU.

Europe is now a proven laboratory for creating world-class start-ups capable of competing internationally.

However, the huge value created this seismic trend looks set to flow mainly to investors outside Europe.

Put bluntly, Europe is in the process of creating unprecedented value which the rest of the world can capitalise on.