Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Finance
    3. >Afghans search for loved ones at Kabul rehab centre bombed by Pakistan
    Finance

    Afghans Search for Loved Ones at Kabul Rehab Centre Bombed by Pakistan

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on March 18, 2026

    4 min read

    Last updated: March 18, 2026

    Afghans search for loved ones at Kabul rehab centre bombed by Pakistan - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:FinanceBankingMarketsConflictAfghanistan

    Quick Summary

    Families and friends in Kabul searched desperately for survivors and the missing at the site of the Pakistan airstrike that destroyed the Omid drug rehabilitation centre (formerly Camp Phoenix), with Afghan authorities citing over 400 killed and Pakistan denying civilian targeting.

    Afghans search for loved ones at rehab centre bombed by Pakistan, as dispute rages over target

    Aftermath and Controversy Surrounding the Kabul Rehab Centre Bombing

    By Mohammad Yunus Yawar and Ariba Shahid

    Immediate Impact and Casualty Reports

    KABUL, March 18 (Reuters) - Families and friends of people undergoing treatment at a rehab centre in the Afghan capital Kabul searched for their loved ones on Wednesday, two days after it was bombed by Pakistan in the deadliest incident in the months-long conflict between the neighbours.

    The Afghan Taliban government has said that more than 400 people were killed and 265 wounded in the air strike that took place on Monday night, just as people and staff at the centre were praying, days before the end of the holy month of Ramadan.

    But the casualty numbers shared by authorities have not been independently verified. The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan told Reuters on Wednesday that 143 people were killed and 119 wounded in the attack.

    Pakistan’s Response and Regional Tensions

    Pakistan rejected the Taliban's claims about the strike, saying it had "precisely targeted military installations and terrorist support infrastructure".

    The strikes mark a new low point in the relationship between the Islamic neighbours at a time of heightened instability for the region due to the U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran.

    Independent experts said it was challenging to establish the truth about the target in the face of the competing claims without a third-party investigation.

    Families Search for Missing Relatives

    On Wednesday, relatives gathered at the site looking for their missing loved ones who were among the hundreds recovering there. Many said they did not know whether their relatives were alive or dead.

    "We came here looking for our patient, he is missing," said Mazar, 50, who gave only one name. "We checked the lists, but his name was not in the list of the living. Maybe he is injured or has been killed," he said.

    The Afghan interior ministry said funerals of some of those killed at the centre would take place later on Wednesday.

    Dispute Over Target of Air Strike

    Conflicting Claims from Afghanistan and Pakistan

    Afghanistan and Pakistan have fiercely disputed the target of the air strike.

    Afghan authorities said the attack had clearly targeted a well-known rehabilitation centre, a former NATO military base named Camp Phoenix that had been converted into a civilian facility about a decade ago.

    Pakistan has said it hit Camp Phoenix, a "military terrorist ammunition and equipment storage site." It added that secondary detonations visible after the strikes indicated the presence of large ammunition depots there.

    International Reactions and Calls for De-escalation

    The EU, UN agencies and international aid groups have said civilian and medical facilities should not be targeted during a conflict and called for immediate de-escalation.

    Expert Opinions on the Nature of the Facility

    “There are enough elements to confirm that this was a civilian facility that was hit,” said Jacopo Caridi, country director for aid group Norwegian Refugee Council in Afghanistan, adding that military infrastructure may have been located nearby. "They might have missed the objective, but the result is that civilians were killed or injured.”

    Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, a political scientist at the University of Pittsburgh and an Afghanistan expert, said it was plausible for civilian facilities to be located within or near former military sites in Kabul.

    Analysis: More Strikes Likely Amid Ongoing Conflict

    Risks of Misidentification and Civilian Harm

    Adam Weinstein, deputy director of the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute in Washington, said misidentification of targets and the proximity of civilians to military targets were constant risks in an air war waged by Pakistan in dense urban areas.

    He added it was a difficult intelligence-gathering environment and the Taliban was an opaque and reclusive government that ignores the norms of war.

    Background of the Conflict

    The conflict between the allies-turned-foes began last year after Pakistan accused Afghanistan of sheltering and backing militants carrying out attacks across Pakistan, a charge denied by the Afghan Taliban government.

    The conflict had ebbed amid efforts by friendly countries including China to mediate, but flared again with Pakistan directly targeting the Afghan Taliban last month and not just Pakistani Taliban militants Islamabad says are in the country.

    Future Outlook

    "Pakistan is exasperated with dialogue and has made the decision to inflict pain on the Afghan Taliban," Weinstein said. "But given the Taliban’s history that’s unlikely to change their position, so bigger strikes are likely."

    (Reporting by Mohammad Yunus Yawar; Writing by Tanvi Mehta and YP Rajesh; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan, Alexandra Hudson)

    References

    • 2026 Kabul hospital airstrike
    • Afghanistan says more than 400 dead in Pakistan airstrike on Kabul hospital

    Key Takeaways

    • •Afghan authorities report at least 408 killed and 265 injured in Pakistan airstrike on Kabul rehab centre, prompting frantic searches for loved ones among rubble and hospitals (en.wikipedia.org).
    • •Pakistan denies targeting a civilian facility, asserting it struck a military post and arms depot, citing evidence like secondary detonations (apnews.com).

    Frequently Asked Questions about Afghans search for loved ones at Kabul rehab centre bombed by Pakistan

    1What happened at the Kabul rehab centre?

    The rehab centre in Kabul was bombed by Pakistan, resulting in over 400 deaths and 265 injuries according to Afghan officials.

    2Why did Pakistan bomb the rehab centre in Kabul?

    Pakistan claimed to target military installations and terrorist support infrastructure, while Afghan authorities said a civilian rehab centre was hit.

    Table of Contents

    • Aftermath and Controversy Surrounding the Kabul Rehab Centre Bombing
    • Immediate Impact and Casualty Reports
    • Pakistan’s Response and Regional Tensions
    • Families Search for Missing Relatives
    • Dispute Over Target of Air Strike
    • Conflicting Claims from Afghanistan and Pakistan
    • International Reactions and Calls for De-escalation
    • Expert Opinions on the Nature of the Facility
    • Analysis: More Strikes Likely Amid Ongoing Conflict
    • Risks of Misidentification and Civilian Harm
    • Background of the Conflict
    • Future Outlook
    •
    International bodies such as the UN have called for an immediate ceasefire and an investigation, while unverified casualty figures and competing claims fuel rising regional tensions (apnews.com).
    3How many people were affected by the Kabul rehab centre bombing?

    More than 400 people were reported killed and 265 wounded, with many families still searching for missing loved ones.

    4What is the dispute between Afghanistan and Pakistan over the air strike?

    Afghan authorities say a civilian site was targeted, while Pakistan states it struck a military ammunition site; the event heightened tensions.

    5What has been the response of international organizations?

    The EU, UN, and international aid groups condemned the strike and called for protection of civilians and de-escalation of conflict.

    More from Finance

    Explore more articles in the Finance category

    Image for ECB sees underpriced geopolitical risks, warns against easing bank rules  
    ECB Sees Underpriced Geopolitical Risks, Warns Against Easing Bank Rules  
    Image for BMW eyes stabilisation in China with latest 'Neue Klasse' launch
    Bmw Eyes Stabilisation in China With Latest 'Neue Klasse' Launch
    Image for IMF mission starts talks with Ukraine as unpopular tax hikes for entrepreneurs loom
    IMF Mission Starts Talks With Ukraine as Unpopular Tax Hikes for Entrepreneurs Loom
    Image for Brembo sees no growth in 2026 earnings and revenue, shares fall
    Brembo Sees No Growth in 2026 Earnings and Revenue, Shares Fall
    Image for Poland plans to ban mobile phone use by under-16s in schools
    Poland Plans to Ban Mobile Phone Use by under-16s in Schools
    Image for Germany's Talanx hints it will reduce stake in grid operator Amprion
    Germany's Talanx Hints It Will Reduce Stake in Grid Operator Amprion
    Image for UK to examine labelling AI content among wider copyright reforms
    UK to Examine Labelling AI Content Among Wider Copyright Reforms
    Image for EU Inc proposal seeks to rival US in innovation by easing startup creation
    EU Inc Proposal Seeks to Rival US in Innovation by Easing Startup Creation
    Image for Britain seeks to allow small wind turbine installation without planning permission
    Britain Seeks to Allow Small Wind Turbine Installation Without Planning Permission
    Image for Analysis-Wealth tax pledge stirs equality debate ahead of Danish election
    Analysis-Wealth Tax Pledge Stirs Equality Debate Ahead of Danish Election
    Image for Poland's Tusk presses EU to keep giving industry free carbon permits
    Poland's Tusk Presses EU to Keep Giving Industry Free Carbon Permits
    Image for UK stocks rise as easing oil prices lift sentiment; Fed decision awaited 
    UK Stocks Rise as Easing Oil Prices Lift Sentiment; Fed Decision Awaited 
    View All Finance Posts
    Previous Finance PostAircraft Lessor AerCap Orders 100 Airbus A320neo Jets
    Next Finance PostSamsung Elec and Amd Sign MoU on AI Memory, Explore Foundry Partnership