Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on March 26, 2025
6 min readLast updated: January 24, 2026
The Trump administration faces backlash after a Signal chat breach involving sensitive war plans, prompting calls for an investigation.
By Patricia Zengerle and Doina Chiacu
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration sought on Tuesday to contain the fallout after a magazine journalist disclosed he had been inadvertently included in a secret group discussion of highly sensitive war plans, while Democrats called on top officials to resign over the security incident.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe - both of whom were in the chat - testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that no classified material was shared in the group chat on Signal, an encrypted commercial messaging app.
But Democratic senators voiced skepticism, noting that the journalist, Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg, reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted operational details about pending strikes against Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis, "including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing."
Committee members said they planned - and Gabbard and Ratcliffe agreed to - an audit of the exchange. The Senate's Republican majority leader, John Thune, said on Tuesday he expected the Senate Armed Services Committee to look into Trump administration officials' use of Signal.
"It's hard for me to believe that targets and timing and weapons would not have been classified," Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with the Democrats, said at the contentious hearing, which featured several sharp exchanges.
Gabbard repeatedly referred questions about the exchange to Hegseth and the Department of Defense.
She and Ratcliffe will face more lawmakers on Wednesday when the House of Representatives will hold its annual "Worldwide Threats" hearing. Democrats said they planned to discuss the Signal chat.
The revelation on Monday drew outrage and disbelief among national security experts and prompted Democrats - and some of President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans - to call for an investigation of what they called a major security breach.
"I am of the view that there ought to be resignations, starting with the national security adviser and the secretary of defense," Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon said at the hearing.
But Trump voiced support for his national security team when questioned about the incident at a White House event on Tuesday with Michael Waltz, his national security adviser, who mistakenly added Goldberg to the Signal discussion.
Trump said the administration would look into the use of Signal. He said he did not think Waltz should apologize, but said he did not think Waltz and the team would be using Signal again soon. Later, in an interview with Newsmax, he indicated that a lower-level colleague of Waltz's had been involved in adding Goldberg to the chat.
Waltz, in an interview with "The Ingraham Angle" on Fox News, said, "I take full responsibility" for the breach, as he had created the Signal group, but he emphasized there was no classified information shared.
Waltz said the situation was "embarrassing" and that the administration would "get to the bottom" of what went wrong. He said Goldberg's number was not saved in his phone and he does not know how the journalist was mistakenly added to the chat group.
'BREACH OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION'
Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia appeared to grow frustrated after Ratcliffe answered "I don't recall" to a series of questions about the content of the Signal chat.
"Director Ratcliffe, surely you prepared for this hearing today," Ossoff said. "You are part of a group of principals, senior echelons of the U.S. government, and now a widely publicized breach of sensitive information."
Some Republicans also wanted to know more. Senator Todd Young said he would inquire during a closed hearing later on Tuesday. "It appears to me there are some unanswered questions," the Indiana Republican said.
A former U.S. official told Reuters that operational details for military actions are typically classified and known to only a few people at the Pentagon and such top-secret information is usually kept on computers that use a separate network.
National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes said on Monday that the chat group appeared to be authentic.
Sensitive information is not supposed to be shared on commercial mobile phone apps. Additionally, Signal's ability to erase conversations would violate laws governing the retention of government records.
"This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, incompetent behavior, particularly toward classified information ... of this administration," the committee's Democratic vice chairman, Mark Warner of Virginia, said.
SECURITY CONCERNS
Accounts appearing to represent Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Hegseth, Ratcliffe, Gabbard, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, and senior National Security Council officials were assembled in the chat group, Goldberg wrote on Monday.
Gabbard acknowledged that she had been abroad during the chat, although she declined to say whether she was using a private phone.
The White House sought to play down the incident. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Goldberg of sensationalizing the story in a post on X.
Also on X, White House communications director Steven Cheung dismissed as "faux outrage" the concern over the inclusion of a journalist in a war-planning chat.
Hegseth told reporters on Monday that no one had texted war plans. Goldberg, appearing on CNN on Monday, called those comments "a lie."
It remained unclear why the officials chose to chat via Signal rather than the secure government channels typically used for sensitive discussions.
Signal has a "stellar reputation and is widely used and trusted in the security community," said Rocky Cole, whose cybersecurity firm iVerify helps protect smartphone users from hackers.
"The risk of discussing highly sensitive national security information on Signal isn't so much that Signal itself is insecure," Cole added. "It's the fact that nation-states threat actors have a demonstrated ability to remotely compromise the entire mobile phone itself. If the phone itself isn't secure, all the Signal messages on that device can be read."
Republican Representative Don Bacon, a retired Air Force general who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, told reporters that Hegseth needed to take responsibility for the apparent breach, which he said put lives at risk.
Asked about the claim that no classified details were shared, Bacon responded: "They ought to just be honest and own up to it."
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; additional reporting by Erin Banco, Doina Chiacu, Steve Holland and Jeff Mason; writing by Patricia Zengerle and Joseph Ax; editing by Don Durfee, Mary Milliken, Nick Zieminski, Howard Goller, Leslie Adler and Gerry Doyle)
The main issue was that a journalist was inadvertently included in a secret group discussion where sensitive national security information was shared, raising concerns about a breach of classified information.
The Senate Intelligence Committee planned to conduct an audit of the Signal chat exchange to investigate the details and implications of the incident.
Trump expressed support for his national security team and stated that he did not believe the national security adviser should apologize, although he acknowledged that the administration would look into the use of Signal.
Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, expressed skepticism about the claims that no classified information was shared and called for accountability and potential resignations from key officials.
The risks include the potential for nation-state threat actors to exploit vulnerabilities, as well as legal issues related to the retention of government records due to Signal's ability to erase conversations.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
