Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on July 9, 2025
2 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
Add as preferred source on Google
The EU Court ruled that the 'I love' sign cannot be trademarked for clothing, supporting EUIPO's decision due to lack of distinctiveness.
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European General Court on Wednesday ruled against German company sprd.netrd.net in its bid to trademark the "I love" sign, with a heart symbolizing 'love,' for clothing items such as t-shirts, sweatshirts, and pullovers.
The Court upheld the European Union Intellectual Property Office’s (EUIPO) 2022 rejection of sprd.net’s trademark applications. The company had sought to register the "I love" sign, featuring a red heart, in specific positions on garments, including the left chest, the back of the neck and the inside label.
EUIPO originally rejected the applications on the grounds that the mark lacked distinctiveness. According to the office, the "I love" expression is immediately understood as a general message of affection and not a sign capable of distinguishing the clothing as originating from a particular brand.
The Court, the EU's second-highest, agreed.
"The sign in question is commonly used and universally recognized as meaning 'I love'," the Court said. "Its placement does not give it a distinctive character that would allow consumers to identify it as originating from a particular business."
Sprd.netrd.net did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.
(Reporting by Charlotte Van Campenhout; Editing by Bernadette Baum)
The EU Court ruled against sprd.net's attempt to trademark the 'I love' sign for clothing, agreeing with the EUIPO's rejection.
The EUIPO rejected the application on the grounds that the 'I love' sign lacked distinctiveness and was commonly understood as a general message of affection.
The Court stated that the sign is universally recognized as meaning 'I love' and does not have a distinctive character that would allow consumers to identify it as a brand.
Sprd.net did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment following the Court's decision.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
