Headlines
Lawyers face sanctions for citing fake cases with AI, warns UK judge
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on June 6, 2025
2 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
Global Banking & Finance Review®
Company
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on June 6, 2025
2 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
UK High Court warns lawyers against citing AI-generated fake cases, highlighting serious legal and ethical implications.
By Sam Tobin
LONDON (Reuters) -Lawyers who use artificial intelligence to cite non-existent cases can be held in contempt of court or even face criminal charges, London's High Court warned on Friday, in the latest example of generative AI leading lawyers astray.
A senior judge lambasted lawyers in two cases who apparently used AI tools when preparing written arguments, which referred to fake case law, and called on regulators and industry leaders to ensure lawyers know their ethical obligations.
"There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused," Judge Victoria Sharp said in a written ruling.
"In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities ... and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services."
The ruling comes after lawyers around the world have been forced to explain themselves for relying on false authorities, since ChatGPT and other generative AI tools became widely available more than two years ago.
Sharp warned in her ruling that lawyers who refer to non-existent cases will be in breach of their duty to not mislead the court, which could also amount to contempt of court.
She added that "in the most egregious cases, deliberately placing false material before the court with the intention of interfering with the administration of justice amounts to the common law criminal offence of perverting the course of justice".
Sharp noted that legal regulators and the judiciary had issued guidance about the use of AI by lawyers, but said that "guidance on its own is insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence".
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Sachin Ravikumar)
The UK judge warned that lawyers using AI to cite non-existent cases could face contempt of court or criminal charges.
Misusing AI can have serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the legal system.
Legal regulators and the judiciary have issued guidance on the use of AI, but the judge stated that guidance alone is insufficient to prevent misuse.
Deliberately placing false material before the court can amount to contempt of court and may lead to criminal charges.
Judge Victoria Sharp emphasized the need for practical and effective measures to prevent the misuse of AI in the legal profession.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
