Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Finance
    3. >Jury orders Bayer to pay $100 million over PCBs in Washington school
    Finance

    Jury Orders Bayer to Pay $100 Million Over PCBs in Washington School

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on January 15, 2025

    3 min read

    Last updated: January 27, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    This image represents the $100 million verdict against Bayer for PCB contamination affecting a Washington school, highlighting ongoing legal battles in the finance and health sectors.
    Image illustrating Bayer's $100 million verdict over PCBs in Washington school - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:EPAinsuranceCompensationfinancial crisisenvironmental issues

    Quick Summary

    A jury ordered Bayer to pay $100 million for PCB contamination at a Washington school, marking another legal challenge for the company.

    Bayer Ordered to Pay $100 Million for PCB Contamination in Washington School

    By Brendan Pierson and Dietrich Knauth

    (Reuters) -A Washington jury on Tuesday ordered Bayer to pay $100 million to four people who say they were sickened by toxic chemicals known as PCBs at a Seattle-area school, but found the company was not liable for injuries alleged by 11 others.

    The verdict, which follows a two-month trial, is the latest in a string of trials against the chemical company over the alleged contamination at the Sky Valley Education Center in Monroe, Washington.

    More than 200 students, employees and parents have said they developed cancer, thyroid conditions, neurological injuries and other health problems from polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, leaking from the school's light fixtures. The chemicals were made by Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018.

    Monsanto said in a statement it will pursue post-trial motions, and an appeal if necessary, to overturn the verdict or reduce the "excessive" damages awarded to the four plaintiffs.

    Evidence at trial showed low to non-existent level of PCBs, which could not have caused the injuries alleged, Monsanto said.

    The jury concluded that Monsanto intentionally concealed information about PCBs. It awarded $25 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages.

    "Every case is different and the juries are clearly working very hard to try to get things right for the generational harm caused by PCBs," said Henry Jones, an attorney for the plaintiffs.

    Verdicts in previous trials over the alleged contamination at the school, which have involved different groups of plaintiffs, have totaled more than $1.5 billion, though some have been reduced or overturned. The remaining judgments are also the subject of appeals, Monsanto said.

    Last year, a verdict for $185 million in favor of three teachers and a teacher's spouse was overturned on appeal in favor of Monsanto on multiple grounds.

    The state appeals court agreed with Bayer that the trial court wrongly applied the laws of Missouri, where Monsanto was based, allowing the claims to be filed decades after the company stopped producing PCBs in 1977. The company said Washington law should apply instead, and it would block the plaintiffs' claims as filed too late.

    Washington's highest court is expected to hear an appeal of that ruling.

    In August, an $857 million verdict was slashed to $438 million, after a judge found it included excessive punitive damages.

    Bayer acquired Monsanto for $63 billion in 2018. Since then, lawsuits over PCBs, and more significantly over claims that the weedkiller Roundup caused cancer, have weighed heavily on the company's shares.

    PCBs were once used widely to insulate electrical equipment, and were also used in such products as carbonless copy paper, caulking, floor finish and paint. They were outlawed by the U.S. government in 1979 after being linked to cancer and other health problems. Monsanto produced PCBs from 1935 to 1977.

    Plaintiffs have said Monsanto knew of the dangers of PCBs for decades, but concealed them from the public and from government regulators.

    Bayer has argued plaintiffs have failed to prove their injuries were caused by PCBs, and that the levels found in the school were deemed safe by the Environmental Protection Agency. It has also said the school ignored warnings from government officials that the light fixtures in the aging building needed to be retrofitted.

    (Reporting By Brendan Pierson and Dietrich Knauth in New York; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Lisa Shumaker, Lincoln Feast and Christian Schmollinger)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Bayer ordered to pay $100 million for PCB contamination.
    • •Jury finds Monsanto concealed PCB dangers.
    • •Verdict part of ongoing legal battles for Bayer.
    • •PCBs linked to health issues, banned in 1979.
    • •Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018 amid ongoing lawsuits.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Jury orders Bayer to pay $100 million over PCBs in Washington school

    1What was the verdict against Bayer regarding PCBs?

    A Washington jury ordered Bayer to pay $100 million to four individuals who claimed they were harmed by PCBs at a Seattle-area school.

    2What health issues were reported by those affected by PCBs?

    More than 200 individuals reported developing cancer, thyroid conditions, neurological injuries, and other health problems due to PCB exposure.

    3What is Bayer's response to the jury's verdict?

    Bayer, through Monsanto, stated it would pursue post-trial motions and an appeal to overturn the verdict or reduce the damages awarded.

    4How much has been awarded in previous trials related to this case?

    Previous verdicts in related trials have totaled over $1.5 billion, although some have been reduced or overturned.

    5What did the jury conclude about Monsanto's actions?

    The jury found that Monsanto intentionally concealed information about the dangers of PCBs, leading to the substantial damages awarded.

    More from Finance

    Explore more articles in the Finance category

    Image for UK's RS Group forecasts annual profit marginally ahead of market view
    UK's Rs Group Forecasts Annual Profit Marginally Ahead of Market View
    Image for Spanish gambling group Codere to go on sale for $2.3 billion, Expansion reports
    Spanish Gambling Group Codere to Go on Sale for $2.3 Billion, Expansion Reports
    Image for UK's ASOS posts 50% profit surge on cost-focussed revamp
    UK's Asos Posts 50% Profit Surge on Cost-Focussed Revamp
    Image for UK inflation holds at 3.0% in February
    UK Inflation Holds at 3.0% in February
    Image for Fastweb + Vodafone terminates agreement with INWIT
    Fastweb + Vodafone Terminates Agreement With Inwit
    Image for Asia looks to COVID-era playbook to tackle fuel crisis
    Asia Looks to COVID-era Playbook to Tackle Fuel Crisis
    Image for Analysis-Western powers were unable to secure shipping in the Red Sea. Hormuz will be harder
    Analysis-Western Powers Were Unable to Secure Shipping in the Red Sea. Hormuz Will Be Harder
    Image for Air Liquide executive: will allocate helium volume from other places in the world
    Air Liquide Executive: Will Allocate Helium Volume From Other Places in the World
    Image for Blaze at Russia's Baltic Sea port of Ust-Luga after major Ukrainian drone attack
    Blaze at Russia's Baltic Sea Port of Ust-Luga After Major Ukrainian Drone Attack
    Image for Morning Bid: Deal, or no deal?
    Morning Bid: Deal, or No Deal?
    Image for Labubu maker Pop Mart meets 2025 revenue expectations
    Labubu Maker Pop Mart Meets 2025 Revenue Expectations
    Image for Israel strikes Tehran as Trump says US negotiating to end war
    Israel Strikes Tehran as Trump Says US Negotiating to End War
    View All Finance Posts
    Previous Finance PostDrake Sues Longtime Label Umg for Defamation Over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us'
    Next Finance PostSpanish Watchdog Says Concentration of Banks Not Behind Lower Deposit Returns