Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

45% OF CONSUMERS HAVE BEEN A VICTIM OF CYBERCRIME

One in six consumers globally lost money with 20% of victims losing more than £1,000

New research from MarkMonitor®, the world leader in enterprise brand protection,reveals that 45% of consumers have been a victim of some form of cybercrime — with 65% choosing not to report the incident to authorities. The research also found that one in six of these consumers have lost funds due to online fraud, with 20% losing in excess of £1,000.

Mark Frost
Mark Frost

Of the cybercrimes carried out, false requests to reset social media account passwords was the most common fraud — experienced by 20% of the subsample, closely followed by emails impersonating legitimate companies attempting to solicit personal information (17%).

The research highlighted that victims of cybercrime were fearful of using online services in the future. In addition 21% of the victims experienced dissatisfaction with the brand involved. This impact on brand reputation was reflected in the fact that when asked about recent high-profile cyberattacks, 71% of consumers said they believed these events damaged an organization’s reputation, 65% said they thought it decreased trust in the brand, while a further 53% stated people wouldn’t engage with the brand in future. The findings highlight the importance of organizations having a comprehensive brand protection strategy in place.

Conducted by Opinium, a leading market research company, the research surveyed 3,457 consumers across the U.K., U.S., Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Spain, Sweden and the Netherlands to gauge perceptions, attitudes and experiences regarding online fraud, security and cybercrime.

The research found that consumer confidence in transacting online is highest when it comes to established channels, such as mobile banking apps and online shopping websites that were rated as being 52% and 50% trustworthy, respectively. Social media channels (16%) and social media advertising (14%) scored lowest with consumers highlighting a high level of scepticism that these channels fail to keep the personal information of consumers safe.

The research also revealed that there is a high level of awareness amongst consumers (87%) of the dangers of transacting online and the tactics used by cybercriminals leading them to use a number of precautions when online. Limiting the entry of personal details to the websites of familiar brands was the most common answer (54%), followed by checking for https or the padlock symbol in the Web address bar (50%). Despite this knowledge, the research also uncovered that there were areas, such as the Dark Web that consumers didn’t fully understand, with 37% saying they didn’t know what the Dark Web was used for.

Online Fraud Barometer
Online Fraud Barometer

“Cybercrime is affecting both brands and consumers, and is only set to rise as our use of the Internet increases. As a result there needs to be a multi-layered approach to online brand protection, to ensure customer trust, reputation and bottom line are maintained,” says Mark Frost, CEO, MarkMonitor. “This research demonstrates that consumers are not only aware of the severity of cybercrime and the tactics employed, but also the effects these attacks have on the brands themselves. Yet despite these high levels of awareness, they are still falling victim to cybercrime.

“As the sophistication of cyber attackers rises and criminals make more use of underground sites, such as those found on the Dark Web, it is critical that brands look at every method of protection and consider all threat vectors in order to ensure they can protect every aspect of their business and keep their customers safe.”

The research was carried out online in August and September 2016.

The full research report can be found here.