The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) today filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York related to UBS’s issuance, underwriting and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) more than a decade ago. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary civil penalties under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) regarding transactions that date back to 2006 and 2007.
The DOJs claims are not supported by the facts or the law. UBS will contest the complaint vigorously in the interest of its shareholders. UBS is confident in its legal position and has been fully prepared for some time to defend itself in court.
UBS intends to rely on the following significant facts, among others, in its defense of this action and expects those facts to be substantiated in the course of the proceedings:
UBS Suffered Massive Losses on U.S. Mortgage-Related Assets, Including the RMBS Cited in the Complaint, Negating any Inference of Fraud
WANT TO BUILD A FINANCIAL EMPIRE?
Subscribe to the Global Banking & Finance Review Newsletter for FREE Get Access to Exclusive Reports to Save Time & Money
By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. We Will Not Spam, Rent, or Sell Your Information.
- UBS invested USD 100 billion in U.S. residential mortgage-related assets and lost more than USD 45 billion when the housing market collapsed, including losses of nearly USD 900 million on the RMBS referred to in the complaint “ more than the losses on the certificates UBS sold to any other single investor. This fact alone negates any inference that UBS engaged in an intentional fraud that was flatly against its own economic interest.
UBS Was Not a Significant Originator of U.S. Residential Mortgages
- UBS originated only a miniscule proportion of U.S. residential mortgages between 2005 and 2007 (USD 1.5 billion of more than USD 5 trillion) and did not originate any subprime loans. The vast majority of loans underlying the 40 RMBS listed in the complaint were originated by other financial institutions, many of which issued their own RMBS. UBS stopped issuing RMBS in 2007.
UBS Fulfilled its Disclosure Obligations to Sophisticated RMBS Investors
- The RMBS cited in the complaint were purchased by some of the biggest financial institutions in the world and other highly sophisticated investors who had access to loan data from a range of sources. In its offering documents, UBS repeatedly disclosed the risks of investing in the RMBS and made clear that investors could lose money if home prices declined.
Any Penalty Sought by the DOJ Would be Limited, at Most, to Losses to FIFIs
- Following the savings and loan crisis, Congress enacted FIRREA in 1989 to protect federally-insured financial institutions (FIFI) and their depositors from insider abuse, and it was used for this purpose for two decades. This law was never intended to cover all sales of securities to all investors merely because a FIFI is among the investors or other parties involved in the transaction, as the DOJ seeks to misapply it here. UBS believes that FIRREA limits any claim against UBS to sales of the RMBS to FIFIs, who purchased only a small fraction of the certificates sold by UBS. The current losses on all certificates sold to FIFIs are lower than UBSs own losses of nearly USD 900m in these same RMBS.
The Alleged Misrepresentations Did Not Cause RMBS Investor Losses
- To obtain a FIRREA penalty based on investor losses, the DOJ must persuade the court to accept not only that UBS (despite its own massive losses on U.S. mortgage-related investments) engaged in intentional fraud but also that the alleged misrepresentations caused losses to investors in these RMBS. This theory flies in the face of the history of the housing crisis, which began with an unprecedented and unexpectedly severe collapse in U.S. home prices, triggering mortgage defaults and RMBS losses. The historic, market-wide downturn is commonly understood to be the result of a range of factors that created a housing bubble, including low interest rates and government policy.
Notice to investors
This document and the information contained herein are provided solely for information purposes, and are not to be construed as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in Switzerland, the United States or any other jurisdiction. No investment decision relating to securities of or relating to UBS Group AG, UBS AG or their affiliates should be made on the basis of this document. Refer to UBSs third quarter 2018 report and its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2017 for additional information. These reports are available at www.ubs.com/investors.
Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements
This document contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements. While these statements represent UBSs judgments and expectations concerning the matters described, a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors could cause actual developments and results to differ materially from UBSs expectations. Additional information about those factors is set forth in documents furnished and filings made by UBS with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, including the third quarter 2018 report and the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2017. UBS undertakes no obligation to update the information contained herein. UBS specifically prohibits the redistribution or reproduction of this material in whole or in part without the prior written permission of UBS, and UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
UBS Group AG and UBS AG
Americas, +1 212-882-5734